[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-09-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution Importance: Unknown => Medium -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-07-02 Thread Viktor Ferenczi
Tried this and seemed to work. But I had to update a few packages manually in Synaptic. You can find them by searching for packages marked with a gray status icon with an exclamation mark on it. -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug noti

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-07-02 Thread Viktor Ferenczi
Please see here: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/06/install-evolution-230-in-ubuntu-1004.html -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mail

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-05-18 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
Thanks ! When can we get the version 2.30.1.2-1ubuntu1 on Lucid Lynx ? The last one seems to be evolution_2.28.3-0ubuntu9 on http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/e/evolution/ Best Regards, -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug no

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-05-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package evolution - 2.30.1.2-1ubuntu1 --- evolution (2.30.1.2-1ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low * Merge from debian experimental: + debian/control: - add Vcs-Bzr tag - don't build depends on pilot-link it's not required - don't use po-de

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@list

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-13 Thread Sebastien Bacher
it seems something that could be handled better indeed -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-13 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
@Sebastien Bacher: Of course, I have tested all sensible things after upgrading the first computer (kernel, drivers, printer, scanners, fax, voip, etc). But I haven't tested all options of all applications, because, since Warty, I never see any regression bug in applications of Ubuntu. I know y

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
It could be a good idea to upgrade one box to test that everything you need is still working next time, we try as best to not break things between versions but we don't write all the softwares we distribute and bugs happen. The issue you raised has not been really flagged as a stopper until now lik

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
Ok... Thanks for your help Sebastien. We prefer Evolution, but we will uses Mozilla Thunderbird while the fix come in Ubuntu Karmic (If this come a day in Karmic..). The bug seems fixed in Fedora 13 since at least one month : https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588833 Generally, we wait

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
installing 2.26 on karmic will probably reveal to be non-trivial since it would require to downgrade the evolution-data-server stack too, I've no easy reply for your right now, the easiest might be to look at fixing the issue in 2.28 -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
For us it's a very big problem because we have a lots of identities and we need to reply multiples hundreds of emails every day. Our administration staff manage multiples companies (partners in the same office) for multiples services (commercial, supports, recruitments etc), with one centralized I

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
downgrading should be working but I didn't try, is selecting the email you want to use so much of an issue? in which cases is it buggy exactly? -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
@Sebastien Bacher: Ok, I understood. There is a way to permit to go back in version 2.26 into Karmic, please ? -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
> Is it possible to have a ppa repository in this case ? what would you use in the ppa there? the new version is not in lucid because it's a rewritte with quite some technologies changes so it would be a stability issue and not apply easily on karmic. if the logic used to work in jaunty it should

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Guillaume Lecanu
@Sebastien Bacher: Is it possible to have a ppa repository in this case ? For us, it's a big problem in our company, we have upgraded all computers desktop from Jaunty to Karmic this morning. Now this make a lots of problems for all our employees, they have to choose one of our ten identities each

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2010-04-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
the bug has been fixed upstream now, the change doesn't work on the lucid version of Ubuntu though so it will probably not be fixed in lucid unless somebody work on doing a similar change on the current version ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- evolutio

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2009-10-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Also affects: evolution via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597987 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug noti

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2009-10-10 Thread oleksiy
Yes, did it just now, sorry for delay: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597987 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #597987 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597987 -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2009-10-02 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
any news about this ? did you sent the bug upstream? may you tell us the bug number there? Thanks. -- evolution mail aliases regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-

[Bug 409795] Re: evolution mail aliases regression

2009-08-25 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
Thanks for your report, that's something to send directly upstream at http://bugzilla.gnome.org by someone having the issue, for forwarding instructions please read http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME, Thanks in advance. ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low **