I'm not sure why you come to that conclusion, but I always authorize the
accounts whenever requested (the top right menu button turns red). In
fact, I repeatedly authorized and unauthorized the gtalk account when
debugging the problem, trying to make Empathy show the contacts.
In any case the prob
This only seems to happen if I launch Empathy from the Unity Launcher.
It works correctly when I set my status to Online through the Unity
Panel and then launch Empathy from there as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed t
Public bug reported:
This problem happens in two computers, whether I use auto-login or not, with
Ubuntu 12.10.
I configured two accounts on the Online Accounts window: Facebook and Google.
My Facebook contacts always appear on Empathy, but gTalk contacts almost
never appear, with the error mess
It can be hard to see if your image viewer / browser has a light
background, but here is a screenshot.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41326990/Screenshot.png
--
nautilus draws white bars on desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207
You received this b
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41323563/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "usr_lib_nautilus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41323564/usr_lib_nautilus.txt
--
nautilus draws white bars on desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207
You receiv
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
I'm running Lucid Beta 1.
Nautilus version: 1:2.29.92.1-0ubuntu1
Whenever I change my theme in System > Preferences > Appearance,
nautilus draws two white bars in the desktop, as if the wallpaper didn't
fill the whole screen. They are located in
I agree with Adam Williamson and I think a lot of the heat this is
generating comes from the fact that we don't know what is the "Cool New
Stuff" that is being envisioned for the now free space.
I think most people can't really see improvements with this change and
maybe it would open our minds a
I would like to know meanwhile the recommended practice ? Delete
xsession-errors every week ? I'm getting 30MB+ .xession-errors files per
session, will this keep increasing ?
--
(firefox:24993): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead - overeager XID
caching
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
seems like the main culprit is really usplash it tinkers with ttys in
initramfs scripts.
** Package changed: gdm (Ubuntu) => usplash (Ubuntu)
--
x display manager won't open session on next free vt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616
You received this bug notification because you are a member
fair enough, at least for the 4th line (the other 3 i could try to
challenge).
would you anyway be able to hint which file i could look into, haven t
find anything in /etc/init.d (only some references to fgconsole check in
usplash) ?
--
x display manager won't open session on next free vt
https:
Just a comment, the startx "discovery" meant that vt8 was not actually
locked by usplash as I had thought since Gutsy,
--
x display manager won't open session on next free vt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
Sebastien
I beg to differ. Though sure this is not a critical bug, it certainly is
one since it's well documented that new vts should be created
sequentially, vt7, vt8, etc...
Also before I came to the startx "discovery" I've found quite a few
complaints, some very old dating from hardy or 2005 (
seems like gdm is rather managing this
** Package changed: xdm (Ubuntu) => gdm (Ubuntu)
--
x display manager won't open session on next free vt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in
I could notice that the bug disappeared when I disable the Fast User
switch and that consequently I had all my logout menu entries restored.
I guess this is somehow linked at the way the menu probes for checking
if the FUS is set to appear.
Since then my remote logins on NX have been working fine
So Sebastien,
We have all understood this is a well known bug and in fact I've landed
here because i wanted to upgrade form 8.10 and read about. The problem
is that despite this there seems to be no 100% workaround or patch.
Does this daily iso fix mean that any delta upgrade from 8.10 will also
a
Fixed as of today's updates (March 23)
** Changed in: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
gedit-plugins doesn't install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346976
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gedit-plugins
Standard Ubuntu Jaunty daily build, fully updated, with minimal
configuration.
When trying to install the package gedit-plugins, apt always fails with
the following output:
Selecting previously deselected package gedit-plugins.
(Reading da
Just another hint that just happened: I've tried to unmount the sftp
folder and the desktop was frozen (only, other app widows would work
normally) then all icons simply disappeared. Killing the sftp process
made reappear the desktop icons.
So maybe it a problem rather linked to the display of th
I think that this is not right way to handle a bug that has been
reported since three years and through even more distros releases.
I've just landed here for the first time since I'm using nautilus for
sftp and was worried by this strange cpu activity even - and especially
- after the download wou
Just to comment that I semm to understand now that it was more
coincidence than legacy intent as the mounted folder appears
automatically on the desktop. Seems like the best way would be to
disable display of these "lesser" mounted volumes
--
"Connect to server" sftp mount does not save folder l
I´ve now seen now that bug #198857 is indeed a duplicate technically
speaking, but from my average-joe perspective I was far away from
guessing the issues behind of what seems now majorly a basic UI bug
rather than an architecture issue. Simply stated, I just wanted like a
granma to connect to a s
Same problem here, first connection is right. Wonder why is listed
invalid. Pretty much annoying, despite being ranked low priority.
Couldn't find where it has been report before except here, as it seems
slightly different from other natilus root redirection issues.
--
"Connect to server" sftp mo
22 matches
Mail list logo
