Based on the following header lines...
X-RBL-Warning: CBL: "Blocked - see
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=222.173.57.68";
X-RBL-Warning: DSBL: "http://dsbl.org/listing?222.173.57.68";
X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-BLOCK:
"http://www.mxrate.com/lookup/refused.asp?ipaddress=222.173.57.68";
X-RBL-Warn
gt;
> Andrew 8)
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 10:30 AM
> > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMai
tion. More
> > information can be found in the manual. One warning though, you need
> > to make sure to not have any spaces before the first colon so that
> > the header is properly formated, otherwise it might cause unexpected
> > issues.
> >
> > Matt
>
't work
> properly. If this was an IP4R test, the proper variable would either be
> %IP4R% or %REMOTEIP%. If this was a RHSBL test, the variable would be
> %MAILFROM%.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> Gary Steiner wrote:
>
> >So would this work?
> >
> >
hat I basically just gave up on it.
Gary Steiner
Original Message
> From: "Will" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:08 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc causing dns queri
There is a posting on the SmarterTools Forums that discusses the current
SmarterMail 3.0 BETA test.
http://forums.smartertools.com/forums/11870/ShowPost.aspx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
More info on the new release has been posted here:
http://forums.smartertools.com/forums/12089/ShowPost.aspx
Original Message
> From: Gary Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:27 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject:
Possibly this has something to do with the release today of SmarterMail 3.0.
Original Message
> From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:36 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New 4.0 version of Declude?
>
There seems to be early talk on the SmartTools Forums of bugginess in SM 3.0. I for one am not in any hurry to install it, especially since most of my customers need the Spanish language translation, and that hasn't been released yet. For those interested, this little blip is from the SmarterTools
I've never run ClamAV before. Looking at www.clamav.net, I see there are
several Windows ports for it. Is anyone using one of the various Windows ports
for ClamAV under W2K3? If so, which one is best?
Thanks,
Gary Steiner
Original Message
> From: "Bill La
I received a couple with the broken gif as late as yesterday. The Declude
headers end up at the bottom of the message, but they are there. I'm running
Declude 3.0.5.26 and SmarterMail 2.6.
Gary
Original Message
> From: "Erik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2
; Gary, you should upgrade to 3.0.6, which has been out for about a week now,
> as 3.0.5.26 had serious problems with handling certain kinds of mime
> encapsulate messages. We actually had to roll back to 3.0.5.23 after
> reporting the issues with 3.0.5.26 to Declude. Version 3.0.6 fixed th
The problem is not limited to IMail. Declude handles things the same way in
SmarterMail.
Original Message
> From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 4:55 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files
>
> It
I've been having this problem with Declude going back to August and my
installation of 2.0.6. I'm currently running 3.0.6.4 with SmarterMail 2.6. It
seems that irregularly Declude's ip4r tests time out, but SmarterMail
redundantly running the same tests has no trouble picking up the spam. I h
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:27 PM
> > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure
> >
> > I've been having this problem wit
; > > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 2:40 AM
> > > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ip4r failure
> > >
> > > What is the OS of the DNS server being used?
> > >
> > > John T
> > > eServices
Create some sort of counter weight. Use an ipfile with 209.191.87.115 or even
209.191.87.0/24, or whitelist mail.mud.yahoo.com depending on how open you want
to be. Though counter weights are always better than whitelisting.
Gary
Original Message
> From: "mail-lists" <[EM
It is interesting how SmarterMail's web mail interprets Dave's message. It
sees the META statement in his message as embedded code, and runs it when I
read the message.
Original Message
> From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 3:50 PM
> T
egments to be executable, yet it can be in
> SmarterMail webmail if it is working the way that you reported.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> Gary Steiner wrote:
>
> >It is interesting how SmarterMail's web mail interprets Dave's message. It
> >sees the META s
TML portion is blank then they are doing what many
> clients would do. Default to the HTML view. They also may be using poor
> judgment and assuming that no one would ever discuss HTML tags in a plain
> text email and not parsing them.
>
>
>
> Kevin Bilbee
>
>
&g
> result from displaying plain text as HTML, and suggest that if they are
> displaying a plain/text only message, to do some bracket replacement in
> order to keep plain/text elements from becoming functional in the HTML view.
>
> Showing a message that is plain/text as HTML i
The implication from reading what little was said about their beta testing on
their forums (they were very tight lipped about it), is that it was done by
SmarterTools' hosting provider crystaltech.com. I presume that the two
companies have some type of close relationship, both from a business s
> It will be very interesting to see what kind of response I get.
>
> -Dave Doherty
> Skywaves, Inc.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 6:42 PM
> Subject:
I've seen all the talk for and against SPF on this list, and I've been trying
to decide how much weight I want to give SPF. (I'm currently using Declude
3.0.6.4 and SmarterMail 2.6). I started playing around with SmarterMail's SPF
tags by setting them to a low or zero weight just so I could se
SPFUNKNOWN spf unknown x 0 0
> SPFFAIL spf fail x 50 0
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 6:36 PM
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF tests in Declude
>
>
> I'
the other tests that I
haven't paid much attention but assumed the default was correct. Thanks Scott,
and all the others who patiently gave the answer in the past.
Gary
Original Message ----
> From: Gary Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday,
I've seen something similar to this, though in that paticular case it was a
redundant quote or apostrophe in the name part of the email address.
Original Message
> From: Orin Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 8:09 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
I received a spam from 209.200.224.192 which Declude reported as
X-Country-Chain: [ARIN Unlisted]->destination
I went to www.arin.net and did a whois, and 209.200.224.192 came up as a
typical US company. What is ARIN unlisted?
Gary
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing lis
Now that I have installed Declude 3.1 with SmarterMail 2.6, I see that Declude
is whitelisting certain addresses based on SmarterMail's "Trusted Senders"
section of "My Spam Filtering". Is there any way to turn this feature off in
Declude so that it continues to function as part of SmarterMail
I found after doing an install of Declude 4.2.3, that it contained an
all_list.dat file with a date of 3/29/2006 and a file size of 310kb (318,376
bytes).
Gary
Original Message
> From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 1:44 PM
> To: Declude.J
Before I started seeing these spams, my Declude logs were set to MID, and each
of these new spams would show the same three lines:
06/04/2006 07:25:39.868 50467903 Error in envelope file:
c:\SmarterMail\Spool\proc\work\50467903.hdr
06/04/2006 07:25:46.165 50467903 AHBL:6 CBL:14 DSBL:6 MXRATE-BLO
No. Most likely it is because declude.junkmail typically experiences a lot of
traffic, but recently it's been extremely quiet. I guess some folks just got
paranoid.
Instead of posting "test" messages, it would be better if folks asked a
question or made an appropriate comment to start a threa
Try the SUBJECTCHARS test. It will catch spam that has a certain number of characters in the subject. For 60 characters and a weight of 4 the test would be
SUBJECTCHARS subjectchars 60 x 4 0
From: "
I believe Declude Support has to do it manually on their end. However, they
are closed on the weekend, so you are not going to get any response from them
til Monday (unless they are taking off Monday in conjunction with the 4th of
July, in which case you may have to wait until Wednesday). Rega
What is the ZEROHOUR test? I see it in the X-Declude headers, but I don't have
it defined in any of my config files. I don't see it mentioned in any of the
manuals either.
Gary
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROT
Now that I've installed 4.2.20, I'm getting a lot of messages in the error
folder (I'm running SmarterMail 3.3.2369). Most of them seem to be spam, but
there are some good messages in there. Am I now going to have to scan this
folder for false positives just like the held spam folder?
Here is
I just went into Add or Remove Programs under the Control Panel of my W2K3
server to remove something unrelated to Declude, and noticed that Declude
Security Suite is listed there three times. When I click on "Click here for
support information" for each entry, they give versions as follows: 4
sages in the
> \spool.
>
> David B
> www.declude.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
> Steiner
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 2:52 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: re: [Declude.Ju
hese are like T files in
> Imail where it is not a complete message, but for some reason SmarterMail is
> allowing Declude to have them even though they are not complete.
>
> John T
> eServices For You
>
> "Seek, and ye shall find!"
>
> > -Origin
es back to who should provide the fix, in this case we did as it
> > was causing messages not being scanned by Declude for spam.
> >
> > I am trying to get a better understanding to the problem from SM and
> > as soon as I have some answers from them I will post to the list
inyada but in this instance we
> have provided a solution for what is happening in SM. And as I have said we
> are working with them to resolve this between us.
>
> David B
> www.declude.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
t;
> Gary,
>
> If we gave you the option to delete these messages (as SmarterMail should be
> doing) rather than move them to the \error directory would that solve your
> problem ?
>
> David B
> www.declude.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTEC
I don't have STOPATFIRSTHIT in my body filter, and it always stops the first
time it finds something.
Original Message
> From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:31 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMai
Wow! It's like one of those MasterCard commercials.
Here's an example server based on list prices:
SmarterMail Enterprise Edition (Unlimited Domains and Users) - $899
Declude Security Suite for Smartermail Enterprise (Unlimited Domains) -
$1750 Annual Subscription
F-Prot Antivirus for
I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declude
4.3? I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know
what I'm getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff.
The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are es
l to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has
> been established with Declude.
>
> http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121
>
> Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now
> have to pay them some of your meager profits?
>
&
t; 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and will
> provide the details to this when it is ready.
>
> David B
> www.declude.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
> St
I'm having this same problem with AVG. I'm running Declude 4.3 with the latest
version of SmarterMail.
Gary
Original Message
> From: "Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 12:59 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [De
Today I discovered a new spam on my server that at first I thought might be a
virus. It had the subject line "Bill Summary - Invoice #36644" and "August
Payment Summary, Invoice #48729" with the number being random. It delivers its
message inside an attached word document called "invoice.doc".
Interesting. If I log in to my account on the Declude web site, there is no
option listed for the new CRM module. It is not that it is grayed out as
described below. It just isn't there. And I do have a current service
agreement.
So, since according to this message we can no longer use [EMA
agement
> module
>
> Then I would contact customer service to have them flip the switch so you
> can place support tickets.
>
>
> Kevin
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Gary Steine
mber 08, 2006 12:57 AM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [EMAIL PROTECTED] versus new case management
> module
>
> I think it means you have to pick up the phone and call them.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
David,
Is the NONSTANDARDHDR test on by default, or do you need to add it to your
virus.cfg file? I've been running every version since 4.2.20, and I have never
seen a message with a broken header moved to my \virus folder.
Gary
Original Message
> From: "David Barker" <[EM
Say I have the following in my $default$.junkmail file:
FILTER-PHISH COPYTO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEIGHT20 HOLD %DATE%
If both tests are triggered on the same email, the COPYTO never occurs. It
only does the HOLD. I tried switching the order of the tests in the
$default$junkmail file and the g
ced this? And is there any other work around that will
let me do what I want to do using filters or some other aspect of Declude?
---- Original Message
> From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:48 PM
> To: declude.junkmai
You can find links to several pages with filter samples at
http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/declude.htm
Original Message
> From: "Craig Edmonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 12:53 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ca
I found this RBL monitor through Google, though have not used it myself:
http://www.cmsconnect.com/BLM/BLMonitor.htm
Anyone have any experience with this or some other similar product?
Gary
Original Message
> From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 1
SmarterTools just announced some information about the next release of
SmarterMail. They are releasing SmarterMail 4.x beta around Novemember 6th.
Check out the official statements here:
http://forums.smartertools.com/forums/thread/21267.aspx
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
So you are implying that those of us who are not running Commtouch, if we
remove the ZEROHOUR statement from the global.cfg the X-Declude-RefID line in
the headers will go away?
(How to get rid of that line is a question that has been asked here before.)
Original Message
> F
I'm using most of the ones you mention, and the ones I'm using all work. He's
what I have in my global.config that matches your list:
AHBLip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org * 7 0
DSBLip4rlist.dsbl.org * 8 0
MAILPOLICE-BULK rhsbl
Is it because when it reaches WEIGHT19 and does the ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED],
the message is delivered? Then when it tries to perform the action of WEIGHT32
the message is already gone?
Does Declude allow for multiple instances of the same action where subsequent
actions are performed, or doe
SmarterTools just announced a features list for the next release of
SmarterMail. They are releasing SmarterMail 4.x beta on Monday, November 13th.
(They estimate a final release of 4.x around January.)
The new features include greylisting and integration with SpamAssassin.
Check out the offic
Same in SmarterMail. It is interesting when you receive one of these messages
to find the Declude header lines at the end of the message, and the one or two
header lines that SmarterMail appends (after Declude hands the message back to
SmarterMail) right where they should be at the end of the h
I'm also using SmarterMail Enterprise Edition 3.3.2439 and Declude 4.3.14, and
have had CMDSPACE configured for quite a while, but hadn't thought anything
about it. When I saw your message I ran DLanalyzer on my logs for the past two
weeks and saw that there were no hits for CMDSPACE at all. S
, November 10, 2006 3:10 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] CMDSPACE/SmarterMail
>
> I see that too, I will look into this.
>
> David B
> www.declude.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, you can have a separate $default$.junkmail file for each domain, so
whatever unique tests you wanted for a domain you would just define it in your
global.cfg and then list it in the $default$.junkmail for that domain.
Gary
Original Message
> From: "Dean Lawrence" <[EMA
BLITZEDALL went offline in May (see http://opm.blitzed.org). Other than that,
all the ones you are using I am also using.
Other IP4R tests that I am using successfully that you are not:
ADNSBL dnsbl.antispam.or.id
BASURA bl.emailbasura.org
CSMA-SBLbl.csma.biz
IMP-SPAMspamrbl.i
You might want to run it for a little while to see what results you get. I've
gotten a lot of false positives with Sniffer.
Gary
Original Message
> From: David Dodell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:41 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subjec
For those SmarterMail owners who may have noticed that SmarterTools has been
offline for over 24 hours, you can read about it here:
http://www.crystaltech.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=16305
Gary
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-ma
Declude has an entry in their Knowledge Base that lists the regions:
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=35&KBSearchID=6746
As for country codes, the most official source is probably the IANA:
http://www.iana.org/root-whois/index.html
Thought they probably get their inf
Regardless of which anti-virus program you are using, you can easily add ClamAV
to give you an extra layer of protection (and it's free). Besides, I've often
seen ClamAV pick up new viruses long before F-prot adds them.
Gary
Original Message
> From: "Serge" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
It should read http://shopping.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=97
When Declude updated its web site a couple months ago, they missed a lot of the
old links. All you need to do with the old link is to change "www" to
"shopping".
Original Message
> From: "Mike Wiegers" <[EMAIL PRO
It's better to weight your whitelist rather than have an IP be fully
whitelisted. You would have an entry like this
WHITELIST-IPipfile C:\{MAILSERVER}\Declude\Filters\WHITELIST-IP.txt
x -20 0
In the file WHITELIST-IP.txt you would have something like this
123.456.78.90
Submit a sample through http://www.virustotal.com
and it will show you which anti-virus programs are currently identifying it.
Gary
Original Message
> From: "S.J.Stanaitis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 4:09 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subjec
Anybody notice a significant drop in spam?
>From the CNN web site:
"Quake knocks Asia back to pre-Internet days"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/12/27/taiwan.quake.ap/index.html
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL P
David,
Has any progress been made on this issue? Using SmarterMail Enterprise
3.3.2439 and Declude 4.3.23, I still am not seeing CMDSPACE getting any hits.
Gary Steiner
Original Message
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, Nove
David (or any Declude people that may be reading),
Any chance of seeing a new all_list.dat any time soon, considering the current
one has a date of 6 Jul 06, and considering the additional input from this
recent thread?
I'm starting to see false positives caused by weights I previously gave to
SmarterTools just released the next major version of SmarterMail. It has been
rewritten in ASP.NET 2.0 from which they claim across the board performance
improvements. Major new features include greylisting and built-in ClamAV, as
well as better features for use as a gateway. For a list of ne
Is there some equivalent of fuzzyOCR that can be used with Declude?
http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/WhatisFuzzyOcr
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives
What you will have to do is set up a $default$.junkmail file for each user that
wants a unique configuration. Check out
http://manuals.declude.com/ProcOnlineHelp/JunkMail_4.0.8_Per-User_Configuration.htm
Original Message
> From: "Kelly Scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tue
I have a question to follow this subject. If users have Outlook and they are
sending email fromm home or whereever using authentication, then the IP that
shows up in the header will be their home connection. That being the case,
unless your users are strictly using webmail, your SPF record sho
mail
> server. So, the remote mail server (possibly my mail server) would check the
> SPF to determine if your mail server was listed as a source for the domain
> of the sending email address.
>
> Michael Thomas
> Mathbox
> 978-683-6718
> 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
>
SMTP AUTH
> bypasses Declude filtering.
>
> Darin.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 4:10 PM
> Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SPF record qu
; > or any other way you avoid filtering your connecting users.
> > Its all about
> > your server sending to the destination server.
> >
> > This has been working for us for the past year and a half or so.
> >
> > Darin.
> >
> >
> > - Orig
everything runs
> > smoothly and the next we'll get 100 messages back from Yahoo. We've given
> > up trying to figure it out, but SPF is not the culprit.
> >
> > Shayne Embry
> >
> >
> >
> > Original Message
> > > From: "
You should see one of these in your virus.cfg file:
BUILTINSCANNEROFF
BUILTINSCANNERON
Though I believe the default is ON.
I don't think it uses "scanner 0" anymore. If AVG finds something, you should
see a line in the log file that contains "AVG Reports VIRUS:"
Original Me
In looking for a PCRE/regex for dummies, found these links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCRE
http://www.pcre.org/
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/pcre.htm
http://www.english.uga.edu/humcomp/perl/regex2a.html
http://www.regular-expressions.info/
http://www.regex.info/
Orig
Here are some web pages you might check out:
http://www.cecilw.com/eudora/regexp.htm
http://www.adamlyon.com/spam/spam_filter_regex.html
http://www.adamlyon.com/spam/afo.txt
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/BadContent
http://www.regexlib.com/
Hopefully at some point Declude will post a list of g
Have you tried DLanalyzer?
http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/
There is a free version that you can use for evaluation.
Original Message
> From: "IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:35 AM
> To: declude.junkmail@de
Here's an interesting recent post from the SmarterMail forums that covers this
topic:
http://forums.smartertools.com/forums/thread/30555.aspx
Original Message
> From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 12:44 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude
Is dnsbl.antispam.or.id working? I haven't gotten any hits off it for over two
months, but I haven't seen anything posted about it being discontinued or shut
down. Anyone else having good/bad luck with it?
Gary
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
David,
Has any progress been made on this issue? Using SmarterMail Enterprise 3.3.2621
and Declude 4.3.40, I still am not seeing CMDSPACE getting any hits.
Gary Steiner
Original Message
> From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, Ja
You can find it in the knowledgebase at
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=6&KBSearchID=8956
To get a perspective on how it is being used by different folks represented on
the mailing list, go to
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/
and do a search
May 1st is a big holiday in Europe, so maybe that had some affect.
Original Message
> From: Heimir Eidskrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:45 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam reduction ?
>
> IS - Systems Eng. (Kar
I've been using them for a while. dhcp.tqmcube.com has given good results,
though I've gotten one or two false positives from spam.tqmcube.com (I still
use spam.tqmcube.com, just with a lighter weight). ko.tqmcube.com flags ip's
from South Korea, and prc.tqmcube.com flags ip's from China, so t
The "corrupt RIPE data" should be referring to 145.53.30.139. Though if you go
to www.ripe.net and do a search, 145.53.0.0/16 is listed as belonging to Planet
Technologies with an email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and being in The
Netherlands. Which is essentially the same as the listing for
One of my customers is using GroupMail to send out a monthly newsletter along
with occasional announcements to a school mailing list. His list currently has
between 400-500 members. He is using the free version of GroupMail.
http://www.group-mail.com/asp/common/groupmail.asp?ct=232
According to the whois at www.arin.net, 41.0.0.0/8 belings to AFRINIC, and if
you go to www.afrinic.net and use the whois there, the numbers break down like
this:
41.223.109.25 KE (Kenya)
41.207.19.204 CI(Cote d'Ivoire)
41.207.9.101 CI (Cote d'Ivoire)
41.207
My situation is similar to yours. I started with F-Prot, then later added
ClamAV. After Declude added AVG and F-Prot changed their pricing, I dropped
F-Prot.
I've been using the SOSDG port of ClamAV together with runclamd and runclamscan
to take advantage of Clamd, and I've never had a proble
> --tempdir=D:\IMail\spool\proc\work --no-summary -l report.txt
> #VIRUSCODE 1
>
>
> thanks
> John
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary
> Steiner
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 10:38 AM
&
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
