[ Bcc debian-x and debian-gtk-gnome, discussion on -devel as the topic
crosses the boundaries of multiple teams ]
Hello,
it has been some time that GNOME 3.20 users have been unable to configure
their touchpad[1] because:
1/ xserver-xorg-input-synaptics cherry-picked an upstream commit[2]
th
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi,
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I've enabled the kernel's qxl driver, but disabled by default so that
> it doesn't conflict with wheezy's version of xserver-xorg-video-qxl.
>
> Please install a modprobe configuration file with
Hello dear maintainer(s),
the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Squeeze version of libxfont:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-1802
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-1803
https://security-tracker.debian.org/t
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:42:17PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Please could you move dpkg-architecture from dpkg-dev to dpkg ? It seems
> > > that
> > > because o
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Or we can change type-handling too. Apparently xorg only uses the fact
> > that type-handling provides not+sparc but it doesn't use the type-handling
> > program which is the real user of dpkg-architecture. Is that right?
>
> Yes, that's correct.
>
>
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hello!
Hi !
> Did you read /usr/share/doc/xfree86-driver-synaptics/README.alps and
> tried the configuration suggested there?
>
> The 3rd paragraph says:
> "Since ALPS touchpads don't have the same resolution as Synaptics
> touchpads, you probably hav
Le Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:48:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson écrivait:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:05:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> [...]
> > That doesn't quite take care of getting them onto the first CD though.
> > And it's a bunch of special purpose code I would like to avoid
> > maintaining, if
Le Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:56:14AM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
> I was told they are scattered amoung the first three cd's.
Discover was already on the first CD. I don't know for the two other
packages. Anyway, they'll be on the first CD next time we build a CD set
(if Phil uses the latest CVS vers
Hello people,
could you package the "xset" program as part of the X Strike Force ?
The package already exists in Ubuntu and is maintained by Daniel Stone.
It is used by the package acpi-support that I'd like to integrate in
Debian.
Cheers,
Raphaël.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 01 May 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:00:07PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Hello people,
> >
> > could you package the "xset" program as part of the X Strike Force ?
> > The package already exists in Ubuntu and is maint
Hello,
I've been trying to recompile all packages as if we were using the 3.0 (quilt)
source package by default and investigating the related build failures. In
theory all quilt-based packages should _not_ fail but all the
xserver-xorg-* (and a few other X related package) do fail because
they use
BTW, please CC me on reply, I'm not subscribed to the list.
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> For reference here are the X related packages where I saw those failures:
Of course I missed all the other that did not start by "x":
libice_2:1.0.4-1_sid32-gcc43.build
plied
- your build target must work with patches applied even if the clean
target is supposed to unapply them (because dpkg-source -b might
have applied them back)
Cheers,
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with pa
upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e dpkg-source -b might
have applied them back)
Cheers,
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ource -b might
have applied them back)
Cheers,
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ource -b might
have applied them back)
Cheers,
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plied
- your build target must work with patches applied even if the clean
target is supposed to unapply them (because dpkg-source -b might
have applied them back)
Cheers,
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with pa
ource -b might
have applied them back)
Cheers,
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Here’s the output:
>
> > File: „/var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-terminal-emulator“
That's not the good file. I asked for
/var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz.
(Hence the rest of the mail is useless, we know the x-terminal-emulator
alter
Hello,
since dpkg 1.15, update-alternatives is more strict and forbids lots of
silly operations that were previously accepted. Unfortunately improper
usage of u-a in the past could lead to cruft files that cause bugs on
upgrade. You have examples in #530633 and #531611.
| Setting up gnome-session
[ Same message sent in bcc to all remaining "FTBFS with new source format" ]
Hello,
the new source format "3.0 (quilt)" is now allowed in testing/unstable and
having all packages buildable with the new format is a release goal
(http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/NewDebFormats).
Thus it would be
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010, Marcelo wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 09:23:34AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > That's not the case here with 0.44-1 and IIRC it was not the case with
> > 0.43 either.
>
> Maybe this is an useful datapoint: it used to be the case that
&
Le Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:48:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson écrivait:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:05:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> [...]
> > That doesn't quite take care of getting them onto the first CD though.
> > And it's a bunch of special purpose code I would like to avoid
> > maintaining, i
Le Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:56:14AM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
> I was told they are scattered amoung the first three cd's.
Discover was already on the first CD. I don't know for the two other
packages. Anyway, they'll be on the first CD next time we build a CD set
(if Phil uses the latest CVS ver
27 matches
Mail list logo
