For a long time, I haven't been able to upgrade xorg on my system
because it I use "xserver-xorg-video-ati", which depends on
"xserver-xorg-video-r128", which is out-of-date w/r/t the rest of xorg.
My system has a radeon GPU, so of course what I _really_ want is
xserver-xorg-video-radeon, but my i
Michel Dänzer writes:
>> (1) Is xserver-xorg-video-ati still necessary, or can i install only
>> xserver-xorg-video-radeon and avoid the above problem?
>
> -ati is only necessary for automatic loading of the radeon driver. If
> you have a xorg.conf with at least a Section "Device" for Driver
>
Julien Cristau writes:
>> For a long time, I haven't been able to upgrade xorg on my system
>> because it I use "xserver-xorg-video-ati", which depends on
>> "xserver-xorg-video-r128", which is out-of-date w/r/t the rest of xorg.
>>
> What do you mean "out of date w/r/t the rest of xorg"?
[Sorry
Ok, I looked at it more, and it was my fault -- somehow I had the
version of xserver-xorg-video-r128 from experimental installed (the
rest of xorg is from unstable), and that was screwing up dependencies.
BTW, although it's in "experimental", that version (6.8.1-5+exp2) of
xserver-xorg-video-r128
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
I got queried to reconfigure my xserver when I upgraded today*, and when
it a asked for a list of modules to load, I selected `xtt' because it
said it was used for east-asian font rendering (which I need).
[* Incidentally, it had no usef
Hi,
I'd like to set the display DPI for X apps to see, as the default of
75 DPI is really off for me.
As XFree86 4.x doesn't support my video card adequately, I'm using
debians 3.x xserver-mach64 package.
I tried to add the line (which works in XFree86 4.x):
DisplaySize 250 177
to the `Moni
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
I got queried to reconfigure my xserver when I upgraded today*, and when
it a asked for a list of modules to load, I selected `xtt' because it
said it was used for east-asian font rendering (which I need).
[* Incidentally, it had no usef
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm more than happy with the job Fabio does as RM - I have absolutely no
> issue here. My issue is with the fact he refuses to acknowledge that
> some people have a little more privilege than others in Debian X
> maintainership.
Why does it matter if he a
Hi,
I have a computer that has integrated video using the i815 chipset (or
at least, that what the kernel/X says). This works fine with xfree86
at 1024x768 resolution, but 1280x1024 resolution yields a glitchy
display -- basically everything looks right, but there are about 10
thin shimmery verti
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >(WW) I810(0): xf86AllocateGARTMemory: allocation of 1024 pages failed
> >(Cannot allocate memory)
> >(II) I810(0): No physical memory available for 4194304 bytes of DCACHE
> >(WW) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory:
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Grrr, I really wish I could just slap a debugger on the kernel and
> > see _why_ the allocation is failing... hmmm, maybe I can stick some
> > printks in at least. ACtually that's not a bad idea...
>
> Again, it's likely because you're reserving all A
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > BTW, in case all my efforts fail, anyone got a recommendation for a
> > good but cheap `low-profile'* AGP video card that works well with
> > xfree86? :-) :-(
>
> I'd try xserver-xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 from experimental first.
I tried xserver-xfree86
Hi,
I have a computer that has integrated video using the i815 chipset (or
at least, that what the kernel/X says). This works fine with xfree86
at 1024x768 resolution, but 1280x1024 resolution yields a glitchy
display -- basically everything looks right, but there are about 10
thin shimmery verti
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 07:06:29PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> >(WW) I810(0): xf86AllocateGARTMemory: allocation of 1024 pages failed
> >(Cannot allocate memory)
> >(II) I810(0): No physical memory available for 4194304 bytes of DCACHE
> >(WW) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory:
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Grrr, I really wish I could just slap a debugger on the kernel and
> > see _why_ the allocation is failing... hmmm, maybe I can stick some
> > printks in at least. ACtually that's not a bad idea...
>
> Again, it's likely because you're reserving all A
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > BTW, in case all my efforts fail, anyone got a recommendation for a
> > good but cheap `low-profile'* AGP video card that works well with
> > xfree86? :-) :-(
>
> I'd try xserver-xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 from experimental first.
I tried xserver-xfree86
Package: xutils
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal
xutils has xmkmf, which seems to use imake, but the xutils package
doesn't make sure imake is available (one must install xutils-dev for
that), which is kind of confusing.
[Maybe this is how people expect it to work, but I was confused,
t
Eugene Konev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> xutils 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 in unstable does have both xmkmf and
> imake. xutils 1:1.0.1-2 in experimental doesn't have either, both
> are moved to xutils-dev. And xutils in experimental depends on
> xutils-dev. So there should be something really weird happenin
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (EE) XKB: Couldn't open rules file /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/evdev
>> (EE) XKB: No components provided for device AT Translated Set 2 keyboard
>> (WW) Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap
>>
> You need to upgrade xkb-data to 1.4.
I'
Chris Lamb writes:
> Welcome to experimental, thanks for your motivating comments.
Friendly greetings even!
Experimental is truly a warm happy place!
-Miles
--
Liberty, n. One of imagination's most precious possessions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Apparently Xorg 1.7.5 hit unstable today, and I upgraded, and the first
thing I noticed is that it seems _much_ slower. It's not completely
unusable, but it's definitely unpleasant -- with many apps (e.g. Emacs), I can
repainting as it progresses down the windows, scrolling is jerky/jump in
most e
Brice Goglin writes:
>> Apparently Xorg 1.7.5 hit unstable today, and I upgraded, and the first
>> thing I noticed is that it seems _much_ slower. It's not completely
>> unusable, but it's definitely unpleasant
>
> That's surprising. Can you actually downgrade xserver-xorg-core to 1.7.4
> and che
I just updated to mesa 7.8.2-2 (from experimental), which seems to have
been the last missing ingredient: _finally_, for the first time ever,
OpenGL apps seem to be hardware accelerated for me!
(also using 2.6.35 kernel from experimental)
This is with my motherboard's builtin "Radeon HD 3200" GPU
Miles Bader writes:
> I just updated to mesa 7.8.2-2 (from experimental), which seems to have
> been the last missing ingredient: _finally_, for the first time ever,
> OpenGL apps seem to be hardware accelerated for me!
> (also using 2.6.35 kernel from experimental)
...
> yay!
Ah
24 matches
Mail list logo
