Just FYI, this is also an issue with nouveau.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: htt
Actually, I believe they're just in the wrong place:
/usr/X11R6/lib/pkgconfig/xcomposite.pc
instead of:
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/xcomposite.pc
This applies for libxdamage and libxfixes too.
Cheers
--
Leo Antunes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Descrip
t setting up a collab-maint SVN repository for this pre pkg-xorg
package? Then we could all work on the same code base while it doesn't
change hands.
Cheers
- --
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/L
Any objections?
Cheers
[0] http://download.tuxfamily.org/emiscabpo/compiz-0.6.0
- --
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHKgG5ImLTb
after it).
I agree it doesn't make sense to maintain the old ones.
If the URL I sent was for the old packages, where are the latest version
of the new ones? (sorry if I missed that somehow)
BTW, should this discussion still be cross posted to so many bugs/lists?
Cheers
- --
Leo "
rbit2 (>= 1:2.14.10) | 1:2.14.17-0.1
libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0) | 1.24.0-3+b1
libpopt0 (>= 1.14) | 1.14-4
libsm6 | 2:1.1.0-2
libstartup-notification0 (>= 0.8-1) | 0.10-1
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x
s let me know.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Julien Cristau wrote:
>> I assume the dependency should be bumped to libgnome-desktop-2-11.
>
> yes. that's not a bug. closing.
I'm sorry, could you elaborate on that a bit? Is it not a bug because of
the mentioned block, or did I misunderstand something else?
Cheers
--
.0 | OK | NOK
intel 2.7.99 | NOK | NOK
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
X.Org X Server 1.6.1
Release Date: 2009-4-14
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.26-1-vserver-amd64 x86_64 Debian
Current Operating System: Linux moti
Brice Goglin wrote:
>
> 2.7.99 only supports UXA, EXA doesn't even exist anymore there.
>
Oh, right, sorry, just noticed the log telling me AccelMethod was being
ignored.
For the record: 2.6.29.2 solved the remaining problem.
Cheers!
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[in
10 matches
Mail list logo
