* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> well, considering that woody's default compiler is gcc 2.95 I don't see a
>> reason to compile it with gcc-3.2. That would basically mean that I would
>> need to do a woody transition to gcc-3.2 completely and there's no way I'm
>> going to do that :-)
>
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> well, considering that woody's default compiler is gcc 2.95 I don't see a
>> reason to compile it with gcc-3.2. That would basically mean that I would
>> need to do a woody transition to gcc-3.2 completely and there's no way I'm
>> going to do that :-)
>
2 matches
Mail list logo
