* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> well, considering that woody's default compiler is gcc 2.95 I don't see a >> reason to compile it with gcc-3.2. That would basically mean that I would >> need to do a woody transition to gcc-3.2 completely and there's no way I'm >> going to do that :-) > the correct way is to do a reverse g++ transition, IOW: compile with > 2.95, postfix the package names with a -gcc2.95 or a c0 (or whatever > else you like) and let your library packages conflict with the g++ 3.2 > compiled library packages in unstable.
The same should then be done with various gnome backports: I got a couple of -c102 packages, when installing gnome2.2 from http://mirror.raw.no/ ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/... Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
