Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.7+3~deb7u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
X crashes on the stated page below, when zooming into the map too quickly. Was
able to repeat this multiple times. X crashes back to the login screen. Using
the SeaMonkey browser suite for Debian Wheezy 64-bit.
http
>> Bug: a failing run of dexconf should at least report this !
>> Reconfiguring xserver-xorg should, ideally, at least fail with $? set
>> when dexconf fails.
>>
> Actually dexconf should stop existing.
OK, and what will create my xorg.conf file ?
Or what do I need to configure, instead, to tell t
Hi again Julien,
and thanks for your assistance.
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier ""
> Option "Rotate" "left"
> EndSection
I take it you mean an xorg.conf containing *only* this section will
suffice; any content in xorg.conf will be merged to what would have
been used without it.
> This crash is fixed in the current upstream driver (as of 6.14.1), but
> only by disallowing rotation when acceleration is disabled.
ah. That is sad.
>> Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.37-trunk-amd64 x86_64 Debian
> [...]
>> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 5450" (ChipID = 0x68f9)
>
> There's 1:6.14.2-1~bpo60+1 (and a newer X stack) in squeeze-backports if
> you want to try something.
Thanks - I interpolate that this newer X stack exists in a more recent
release of Debian. The given machine's /etc/issue reports Debian 6.0;
which I see is squeeze, with wheezy in testing. I t
> Switching to testing would give you a more ârecentâ stack, but you could
> drag a lot of breaka^Wfun with other packages and upgrade paths which
> might not be well tested yet. ;-)
I'll settle for the fun ;-)
Eddy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
I was wondering whether this bug has been confirmed elsewhere, since it
is a) very annoying and b) endlessly recurring and c) introduced since
the last version.
I am happy to help debug this.
Thanks,
Edward
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well?
>
> It's been a few days, and I have received no reports of success or
> failure in email.
I am at work right now, so I can not get detailed logs and stuff, but when I
upgraded my laptop Xv stopped working and DRI still does not work. I have an
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well?
>
> It's been a few days, and I have received no reports of success or
> failure in email.
I am at work right now, so I can not get detailed logs and stuff, but when I
upgraded my laptop Xv stopped working and DRI still does not work. I have an
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: normal
When I run the xanalogtv screen hack of the xscreensaver package, I get
a hard lock-up of my whole system. It is not even possible to ssh into
it from another machine. This happens reliably although the time that
elapses before sys
> Unfortunately, most tiny X programs like this one usually don't get much
> maintenance. So you should probably try to come with a patch if you
> really want this to be implemented :/
Fair enough. If I find the time ...
Eddy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:42:33AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:33:14PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, I would appreciate if someone could summup the current
> > state of xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5 packages and what does prevent them to
> > en
Package: x11-apps
Version: 0.1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/xload
The vertical scale of xload adjusts to accommodate the highest load level.
It has horizontal lines to indicate the vertical scale.
A high enough load shall cause these lines to be so closely spaced
that there is no space betw
> This could readilly enough be remedied by providing a command-line
> option, --clip-at=n, to tell xload to not try to display any load
> level above n. More fancy solutions are possible.
closer inspection of the man page suggests this could be implemented as
an optional second value for -scale:
Incidentally, this bug has become unreproducible since I switched from
using the old CRT to using a shiny new flat screen.
Eddy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks, I'm reassigning this bug to the X server. The complete log and
> your xorg.conf would be useful.
OK.
X Window System Version 1.3.0
Release Date: 19 April 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3
Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12)
Current Ope
> Strange, I am not sure what to do with this bug then.
Understandable.
> Will you have a chance to try the old CRT again?
No - it's been junked (see below for why), that's why I replaced it.
This might justify closing the bug as "hardware fault".
> Are you sure the bug disappeared because you sw
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.1.4-3
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: breaks unrelated software
When I start up xdm, the console starts to imagine that there are
three more lines available than actually exist. The console actually
has 25 lines; but the console ttys think it has 28 lin
>> Section "Device"
>> Identifier "Intel 82915G/GV/910GL"
>> Driver "vesa"
>> BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
>> EndSection
>>
> Did you try the "i810" driver instead of "vesa"?
> Also, do you use a fb console?
This is the point where I should point out that I am not a sy
Hi again Julien,
Everone else went home, so I have a chance to break things^W^W
experiment. Upon re-booting and actually checking what resize and
$LINES say when the X server hasn't messed things up, I find that I've
mis-described this bug.
The normal state does in fact have 28 lines; when the X
Interestingly, when aptitude fires up the console-graphical package
configuration tool, during installation of new packages, it manages to
put the OK selector where I *can* see it, even though aptitude itself
fails to show me its last three lines. (For example, when asking me
to hit return to cont
Any chance of seeing this patch in the next X?
http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/xpert/2002-May/017542.html
I am thinking it would fix the video overlay on my laptop.
--
"Your life is lived with the kind of excitement that
your forebears knew only in battle" -- Mark Helprin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Russell Neches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another funky question for the group (sorry folks!). I've noticed that
> occasionally the mouse pointer gets shifted 10 or 20 pixels to the
> right of the mouse focus, and that the problem refuses to go away
> until the system is rebooted. Google turned u
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Due to a power outage, I had to re-boot my etch box after some months,
during which I'd updated it, so am now using the modern xserver-xorg-*
package fragments, where I was using a more m
> http://packages.debian.org/xserver-xorg-core
Yes, I know that package is not available on testing.
That's why I submitted the bug against xserver-xorg-video-i810,
not against xserver-xorg-core.
http://packages.debian.org/xserver-xorg-video-i810
says it's available on testing.
It
* appears to
> Remove the individual i810 driver package,
it wouldn't install, so that was be a no-op !
> the xserver-xorg package in testing includes the driver you want.
when I dpkg-reconfigure it, it starts by asking whether I want to let
it autodetect: and says that it can't recognize what it finds.
> I
> This is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365134
>> It still failed, now saying that it couldn't make sense of the
>> hardware ... Then I remembered that xorg had recently gone into
>> many-package form, so went looking for a suitable
>> xserver-xorg-video-* for the hardware repo
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Followup-For: Bug #296207
Further investigation has revealed that this problem can be solved by
reducing my CPU and memory speed. I am running nforce2 with a Mobile
Athlon XP. I had this at 10x193. So I backed it right down and, after
much testing
I am guessing this has been asked before, but hey.
When I run X I get:
Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/, removing from
list!
Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/, removing fro
m list!
There are no scalable fonts in X, only bitmap font
Ashley Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So any ideas? Have I done something dumb?
>
> Yes, you forgot to add the font modules to your XF86Config file
>
> Section "Module"
> Load "freetype"
> Load "type1"
> EndSection
Thanks. I thought it was something simple.
--
Don't worry -- shop.
Package: x11-apps
Version: 7.3+1
Severity: normal
A power-cut just forced me to reboot into 2.6.24-1-686, having
previously been on a 2.6.18. Most X-related things were restarted
within the last two weeks when I did an /etc/init.d/xdm restart, but
some have doubtless been updated since.
After th
Interesting. My X session tanked, forcing a re-start. My new oclock
remained frozen in time until I switched to a virtual console and
back, at which point the frozen hands went black, except for a
triangle of yellow where one of them intersects the position it should
be in.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: x11-xserver-utils
Version: 7.4+2
Severity: normal
I use xrandr -o left in my .xsession so that I can use my screen in
portrait mode. However, after a recent upgrade, I find that when I
log out (exit fvwm) I don't get the xdm login prompt I'm expecting.
I have to restart xdm.
Previously
Package: x11-xserver-utils
Version: 7.4+2
Severity: normal
In my .xsession, I run
xrandr -o left
which lets me use my screen in portrait mode. (Many modern flat
screens, including the Dell one I'm using, have a pivot at the back
that lets one turn them sideways.)
Unfortunately, doing this gets
I've now added
Option "Rotate" "left"
to Section "Monitor" in my /etc/X11/xrdb.conf
so that xrdb operates in portrait mode ab initio, which avoids the
need to invoke xrandr -o left, hence avoids the problem. However, it
would obviously be better if xrandr and the font infrastructure play
> I use xrandr -o left in my .xsession so that I can use my screen in
> portrait mode.
I'm now achieving the equivalent effect by adding
Option "Rotate" "left"
to Section "Monitor" of my /etc/X11/xorg.conf
(which avoids the font problems I had with xrandr -o left)
and now find that xdm al
I've rotated my screen using xrandr -o left to use it in portrait mode
and, to my pleasant surprise, the oclock now works as it always used
to. There doesn't appear to have been an upgrade to x11-apps since I
reported the bug, but it has been some weeks since I last rebooted or
even restarted my X
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.12.0-1
Severity: important
This seems to be triggered by apps using accelerated video or 3d. This time
it was warzone2100 but I've seen it before with just a few terminals and a
web browser.
The first symptom is that the (fullscreen) display of the g
ed to
important by the forcemerge?
--
Edward Allcutt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1009051401560.4...@jago.allcutt.me.uk
> Sorry for the delay, in the mean time did this get fixed, in squeeze,
> testing or unstable ?
I'll need to log out to test, which would currently be rather
disruptive - so there may be some delay ! But I'll try to find time
for a test soon.
Eddy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.6+6
Followup-For: Bug #623723
I am also having this problem. Here's the output of xmodmap and part of xev
by way of illustration:
=
== xmodmap ==
=
xmodmap: up to 5 keys per modifier, (keycodes in parentheses):
shift Shift_L (0x32), Shif
ve a more precise
date on the correct release version. If it's a bug I didn't notice
myself fixing, I may need to port it to newer branches of the
packaging scripts !
Edward Welbourne, for the Opera packaging team.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
ct conflict would be
Conflicts: opera (<< 9.00-20060616)
Let us know if you run into any similar problems in future, we're
always eager to make our packages fit in better with distributions,
Edward Welbourne, for the Opera packaging team.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
I am guessing this has been asked before, but hey.
When I run X I get:
Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/, removing from
list!
Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/, removing fro
m list!
There are no scalable fonts in X, only bitmap fon
Ashley Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So any ideas? Have I done something dumb?
>
> Yes, you forgot to add the font modules to your XF86Config file
>
> Section "Module"
> Load "freetype"
> Load "type1"
> EndSection
Thanks. I thought it was something simple.
--
Don't worry -- shop.
R6/lib/X11/rgb.txt ]
+ maplink /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb.txt
+ echo /etc/X11/rgb.txt
+ readlink /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb.txt
+ [ /etc/X11/rgb.txt != /etc/X11/rgb.txt ]
So, what conditions are necessary to cause that function to even be
called?
Regards,
Edward.
--
Edward C. Lang:
e there any obvious,
or not so obvious, errors in it? Any help is appreciated.
Regards,
Edward.
--
http://www.tsumakin.net/
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by Dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with cauti
ot; LeftOf "CoffeeScreen"
> > InputDevice "Generic Keyboard"
> > InputDevice "Configured Mouse"
> > Option "Xinerama"
> > EndSection
>
So I make that change, and now I see:
Fatal Server error:
Requested Entity al
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 05:28:17PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2001-10-21 at 05:08, Edward C. Lang wrote:
>
> > So I make that change, and now I see:
> >
> > Fatal Server error:
> > Requested Entity already in use!
> >
> > I assume that'
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb.txt ]
+ maplink /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb.txt
+ echo /etc/X11/rgb.txt
+ readlink /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb.txt
+ [ /etc/X11/rgb.txt != /etc/X11/rgb.txt ]
So, what conditions are necessary to cause that function to even be
called?
Regards,
Edward.
--
Edward C. Lang:
e there any obvious,
or not so obvious, errors in it? Any help is appreciated.
Regards,
Edward.
--
http://www.tsumakin.net/
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by Dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with
ot; LeftOf "CoffeeScreen"
> > InputDevice "Generic Keyboard"
> > InputDevice "Configured Mouse"
> > Option "Xinerama"
> > EndSection
>
So I make that change, and now I see:
Fatal Server error:
Requested Entity al
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 05:28:17PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2001-10-21 at 05:08, Edward C. Lang wrote:
>
> > So I make that change, and now I see:
> >
> > Fatal Server error:
> > Requested Entity already in use!
> >
> > I assume that'
53 matches
Mail list logo
