On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:42:56PM +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:49:25AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > No, this is incorrect. $REALSTARTUP, which may be ~/.[Xx]session, if it
> > >
mail to Branden directly, or perhaps to the X task force ?
debian-x is the best way to reach the XSF, yes.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.kde.org - http://www.debian.org - http://www.xwin.org
"Configurability is always the be
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:48:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:37:52PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:52:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Is there somewhere the 4.3.0-pre1v1 source package are available while
> > &
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:34:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I just need a 4.3.0 package to build with. The -0ds4 would not be ok,
> since it will not have the right dependencies.
You do realize that pre1v1 is in experimental, yea?
--
Daniel
since it is less strong than the first one, but it is not
> tidy.
>
> I have a shlibs.local for libRandR, but it changes nothing to have it or
> not.
>
> Anyway, i am uploading it to experimental now.
You have one relation for xlibs or whatever, and one
Btw, where should bugs for ds4 or (soon)
> experimental be filed (I think there is no experimental tag in the BTS)?
'reportbug xserver-xfree86' or such should get the ds4 bugs to the responsible
person - me.
--
Daniel Stone <[
en I move the mouse, so maybe an evdev driver would work too.
There is an evdev driver in 4.3.0-0pre1v1, which has just hit experimental
today, and that Synaptics driver is scheduled for pre1v2.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.
Debian-specific. Ditto #800.
As for #102 and the like, it's likely that the patch was developed by a
Debianite and sent to us, and we merged it and upstream later picked it up, so
the numbering became inaccurate (sort of) *after* the fact.
Thanks for your vigilan
ecking up with it.
Eric, this issue should be fixed in pre1v2; thanks for your analysis.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always the best choic
the savage3d graphics card/driver but not
> with another graphics card (matrox g200).
Nice one, that's quite interesting - in 4.3.0, we use the Savage driver from
Tim's site, as well - 1.1.27t, to be precise.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTE
with Daniel Stones' current (4.3.0-0ds4) sources,
> which solved the problem. Daniel has promised to include the
> patch in 4.3.0-0pre1v1.
It's already included:
deb http://debian.mirror/debian/ ../project/experimental/ main
--
Daniel Stone
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 05:23:44PM +0200, Marcus C. Gottwald wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote (Wed 2003-Aug-13 10:44:54 +1000):
>
> > deb http://debian.mirror/debian/ ../project/experimental/ main
>
> Hey, great! Without that slash behind "experimental" it works
> e
+= m68k-update1
> - rebuild the package
> - rebuild XFree86 with the new compiler.
I'll do this, but it'll take around 47+ hours before I can get around to it.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www
can run X
> normally, then. But, I can't use the NVIDIA driver. :( 320x200 for me!
> No, this crash isn't related to the NV driver.
Sounds like the ia64 module loader needs to be pulled back from HEAD.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTE
ge.
Should work OK:
(==) MGA(0): Direct rendering enabled
especially if he's coming from ds4. What's the output of glxinfo?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:57:09PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> - don't show the user messages telling him we're not doing anything
Women use Debian, too. :P
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org -
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:25:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 02:18:59PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:57:09PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> > > - don't show the user messages telling him we're not d
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:22:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 07:04:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > There's an email in your inbox explaining why I can't co, ci, up, pg or pe,
> > and
> > what you have to do to restore my ability
ot and the chroot? I've never tried this myself.)
Guys, bind-mount!
mount -t bind /tmp /chroot/tmp
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always
we have the exact diff; just needs to be applied to the repo sometime
before pre1v2 by someone who can actually access the repo.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Co
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:43:37AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> tags 206929 + patch pending upstream
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 10:18:35PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Duraid already reported this to debian-x, but it needs a bug filed
> > so we don't re
th artefacts of not doing proper initialization, with radically
different symptoms (IIRC). Should they still be merged?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Confi
.0.
http://people.debian.org/~willy/xfree86/ shows two candidates:
http://people.debian.org/~willy/xfree86/454_ia64_relocation_types_134_and_135.diff
http://people.debian.org/~willy/xfree86/454_ia64_relocation_types_79_134_and_135
--
Daniel Stone <
on my disks (or buy a new disk) though.
pre1 indicates that it's a prerelease of the -1 revision, and v1 indicates that
it's the first such prerelease. pre1v2 would be the next release, then pre1v3,
etc ... after -1 is released, the next would be pre
ut no 3D.
The alternative is ATI's FireGL drivers for 4.2.x.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always the best choice when it's pre
pport synaptics touchpad under linux 2.6.0
> There were no tags set.
> Tags added: pending
Turned out it didn't build cleanly with debug, because it's very, very sloppy,
and ugh. I've implemented the requisite fixes and the build's
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:40:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:01:17PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > There is an evdev driver in 4.3.0-0pre1v1, which has just hit experimental
> > today, and that Synaptics driver is scheduled for pre1v2.
>
> Y
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:25:23PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Your call.
I reserve the right to revoke this statement within 24 hours, with no notice, of
course. ;)
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://ww
t; synaptics driver is GPL.
I looked at the copyright file, and decided no modification was needed. Branden?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurab
folks. Do we need to include emails stating their intent
> with the package, etc.?
The mails need to be collected together and archived *somewhere*, if only in the
package tarball itself. It's not for us to be keeping around.
--
Daniel Stone
ems on IA-64 (fixed in upstream
> + CVS HEAD; see mail from Daniel Stone)
Already done.
> + + Fix busted PCI bus handling on ARM (fixed in upstream CVS HEAD; see mail
> + from Phil Blundell)
Yeah, that probably still needs doing.
Also, it needs to be building on m68k; basica
ics, people might be intrested in the
fact that I have sucessfully built the synaptics driver
with 2.6 evdev patches using XFree86-sdk, it only required a few extra
headers :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99351 has patches
and a link to a src.rpm.
Paul
- End forwarded m
ches/4.3.0/sid/debian'
svn: Berkeley DB error
svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for filesystem
/var/lib/svn/xfree86/db:
Permission denied
Please fix this error, whatever it is, so others can continue committing to the
repository.
--
Daniel Stone
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:47:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:07:37PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Which goes exactly with what I was trying to tell you on IRC (but was
> > dismissed
> > by you).
>
> You were "dismissed" be
denied error about the glide.4x at the
> bottom. If I remove that file, it just brings up another file name. Maybe
> it's a MANIFEST issue?
I saw that, and I can't help but think it's a local issue: I've had no issue on
i386 and powerpc, chroot or no chroot, up-to-date
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:15:19PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I saw that, and I can't help but think it's a local issue: I've had no
> > issue on i386 and powerpc, chroot or no chroot, up-to-date sid. What
> > filesystem are you runnin
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 10:43:45AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:47:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The repo is working again for all three of us, plus a dummy user I
> > created for testing purposes.
> >
> > Your mileage may vary,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 03:03:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:16:16PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > In the meantime since I sent this message, the repository has been silently
> > fixed.
>
> ???
>
> The message announcing that it was
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:20:47PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Please allow me a perhaps redundant question:
>
> What compiler version has been used for the experimental XFree86
> packages currently in "experimental"?
GCC 3.3.2p
ll as with what kernel X was built, but not give the
> information of what compiler was used to build it.
Getting the information about which compiler built the kernel was entirely
incidental, but thanks for quite a good idea. It can, of course, be retrieve
an experimental packages -- or would this be
> too much against the grain of Debian's emphasis on stable code?
Given we've already dragged back the SiS and Savage stuff, I don't see
why we couldn't drag the nVidia driver back, as ewll. Mark, how stable
is the new nv code?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgpurCeYQ6y9k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;t you finally remove the bogus
> reference to Mesa?
What would you suggest? I was under the impression DRM stuff came from the Mesa
dudes.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
&q
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 01:03, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 03:57:12PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 07:58, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> > > >
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 03:44:00AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 02:18, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > It was originally xfree86-drm-source (ds2 era IIRC), but that didn't last
> > long.
> > I think people on this list forced a change.
>
> For the
is package and xlibs-dev
> contains Xcursor.h, which seems wrong.
>
> I just thought I should tell you... :-)
You'll either need to use --force-overwrite, or get the pre1v1 packages.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED
aid that this bug is fixed in 4.3.0.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always the best choice when it's pretty simple to implement&q
g under VC was that we didn't need this sort of cruft clogging up the
changelog.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always the best choice when
ldbe enabled in order to use AGPFastWrite. I couldn't find any bug
> report, which describes this problem.
That will happen, yes. Don't enable AGPFastWrite. It *will* solidlock your box.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http:/
orry, should've been >=. Mea culpa.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always the best choice when it's pretty simple to imple
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 06:05:50PM -0400, Slaven Peles wrote:
> On September 15, 2003 17:58, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:59:44AM -0400, Slaven Peles wrote:
> > > I added Option "AGPFastWrite" "1" to the "Device" section o
this file in C collation order, instead of
> en_AU or whatever DanielS had it in :-P
It was unsorted.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability is always t
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:35:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:19:12AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:06:52AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> > > Author: branden
> > > Date: 2003-09-17 09:06:46 -0500 (
@@
> To-Do List for XFree86 4.3.0 Release to Debian Unstable
> -------
>
> -0pre1v2
> +0pre1v3
Huh? v3?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.k
ug is, I'm leaving
this as moreinfo.
Thanks for using Debian, and thanks for your analysis.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"Configurability i
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On a slightly realated note, I think Daniel is checking to see if the
> current 017 is even needed for a proper build. It seems to be some legacy
> from 4.2.
Built successfully sans #017.
--
Dan
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:55:47PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > On a slightly realated note, I think Daniel is checking to see if the
> > current 017 is even needed for a proper build. It seems to be some lega
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:15:34PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is there a sorting order to the MANIFESTS, or can I just add whatever
> whereever? I am going to make the changes for the other archs for the
> pkg-config stuff.
LANG=C sort
--
Dan
> +NOTE: This may be machine-specific horkage on one box. If it turns out
> +that's the case, let bug #197076 know.
dburrows reckons he can't reproduce it on his '060, nor on crest (an '040). Odd.
--
Daniel Stone <
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:35:42PM -0400, LaMont Jones wrote:
> Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description:
> lbxproxy - Low Bandwidth X (LBX) proxy server
> [...]
You're a brave m
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:18:56AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> >>>>> "S" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> S> Press Ctrl-Alt-Backspace, or quit every running app. You don't run X
> "forever",
>
> OK, sounds goo
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:22:04PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> I have attempted to contact all the authors of the Synaptics XFree86 event
> driver. Here are the results, so far.
How's this effort going? I still have synaptics stuff rotting in p/d/synaptics.
--
D
er, if everything's on the branch
nowadays, I'll do a fresh pull from there and update 000_xf-4.3-branch.diff.
> I am getting both the 4.3.0-0pre1v3, and todays 4.3.0 branch snapshot,
> and naturally none is there. Is it ok if i build a patch against
> 4.3.0-0pre1v
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:26:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:10:34AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The only difference between my tree and the 4.3 branch is the patch in your
> > inbox.
>
> BTW, i thought that for pre1v3, you pulled everyth
e time to do that
> myself here and now but I'd consider it a a bug if it wouldn't use
> update-alternatives anyway.
Err, dpkg-reconfigure -plow xdm, works reasonably well.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 05:07:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 10:19:00AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 October 2003 09:51, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:18:37AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > > > how ab
g it from head as you or Daniel have done before?
I've got an updated SiS driver patch here (along with an updated 4_3-branch
patch), that I'll commit within the next couple of days. Cheers.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www
.0-0pre1v3 from experimental for your
> architecture.
>
> [...]
> * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
Bastian Blank attempted several times, got tripped up by the DRI foolery and
other NOT_BUILDING_XF86_SERVER fun, and ended up g
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:58:56PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 03:50, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can t
es
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- End forwarded message -
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgpLEziSGTfkd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:35:42PM -0400, LaMont Jones wrote:
> Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description:
> lbxproxy - Low Bandwidth X (LBX) proxy server
> [...]
You're a brave m
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:18:56AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> >>>>> "S" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> S> Press Ctrl-Alt-Backspace, or quit every running app. You don't run X "forever",
>
> OK, sounds good. If yo
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:22:04PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> I have attempted to contact all the authors of the Synaptics XFree86 event
> driver. Here are the results, so far.
How's this effort going? I still have synaptics stuff rotting in p/d/synaptics.
--
D
erything's on the branch
nowadays, I'll do a fresh pull from there and update 000_xf-4.3-branch.diff.
> I am getting both the 4.3.0-0pre1v3, and todays 4.3.0 branch snapshot,
> and naturally none is there. Is it ok if i build a patch against
> 4.3.0-0pre1v3, and
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:26:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:10:34AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The only difference between my tree and the 4.3 branch is the patch in your
> > inbox.
>
> BTW, i thought that for pre1v3, you pulled everyth
that
> myself here and now but I'd consider it a a bug if it wouldn't use
> update-alternatives anyway.
Err, dpkg-reconfigure -plow xdm, works reasonably well.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.de
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 05:07:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 10:19:00AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 October 2003 09:51, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:18:37AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > > > how ab
g it from head as you or Daniel have done before?
I've got an updated SiS driver patch here (along with an updated 4_3-branch
patch), that I'll commit within the next couple of days. Cheers.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www
.0-0pre1v3 from experimental for your
> architecture.
>
> [...]
> * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can tell.
Bastian Blank attempted several times, got tripped up by the DRI foolery and
other NOT_BUILDING_XF86_SERVER fun, and ended up g
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:58:56PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 03:50, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > * s390 has never tried to build XFree86 4.3.0 as far as I can t
es
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- End forwarded message -
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
common.docs.s390: added
>
> + * Fix regular DRI deadlocks on ia64; patch by John Dennis. [Daniel Stone]
> +- debian/patches/453_ia64_fix_radeon_dri_deadlock.diff: added
> +
> -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:37:32 -0500
We're still
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 01:32:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 09:53:30AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:51:36PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
> > wrote:
> > > - debian/changelog:
> > >
out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/xf86drm.h.rej
>
> Please don't commit patches that don't apply. Certainly don't leave them
> untested like this for a whole week.
Whoops - I
il -1 && ls -l | wc -l
106899 total
125
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's next? People turning up on my doorstep, observing that the lack of
release ...
(Hint: there are probably tons of regressions like this.)
(Hint #2: make your svn hook script set M-F-T.)
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's
to ensure the docs
> were also shipped for the hurd-i386 and s390 versions of xlibs-dev.
> Sloppy, sloppy.
Agh, I lose.
Then again, whether HTML versions should even be generated (witness the pain on
slower machines - 27 hours on a 300MHz Alpha for HTML/PS) is debatable.
-
busy with4.3, andI'm busy with exams.
This keyboard sucks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's next? People turning up on my doorstep, observing
e ago, and only became a DD the other day.
(This was done via the XSF SVN repo.)
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's next? People turning up on my doorstep,
ple] Error 1
I'm betting you need to upgrade your libc6 to the version in experimental - or,
at any rate, the version XFree86 was built again.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.free
this, get it from the attic
Apparently p/d/synaptics never made it there. Ah well.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's next? People turning up on my doors
olunteer time, so I really don't know what you hope to achieve
> > by casting vague asperions about "paid Debian jobs" and "elites".
>
> Well, you are discriminating the quality of the debian developer by the
> amount of time they can pass on reading ma
hitespace police. Oh, how I long for "svn blame".
It's coming, apparently.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's next? People turning up on
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 01:44:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 02:32:47PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:57:06PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
> > wrote:
> > > Update the extended descriptions of package
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:00:12AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Apply patch from Steve Langasek to drop the xprt package, and stop
> building the Xprt X server, since this functionality did not work in any
> version of XFree86 up to 4.3.0, and has moved to the xprt-xprintorg
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:52:25AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
> i want to talk to you about a problem in x.org/xserver.
> When a newbie user change the video card or some other sensible
> component - like monitor - caused by a component crash or simply by an
> hardware upgrade Xfree and X.org in debi
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 08:04:31AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> | On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:00:12AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> Admin wrote:
> | I think this is a bad idea, because the head of Xprint development is
> | now X.Org, a
ree86-common.docs.s390: added
>
> + * Fix regular DRI deadlocks on ia64; patch by John Dennis. [Daniel Stone]
> +- debian/patches/453_ia64_fix_radeon_dri_deadlock.diff: added
> +
> -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:37:32 -0500
We're
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 01:32:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 09:53:30AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:51:36PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > - debian/changelog:
> > >
s patch
submission/sync with upstream and everyone else on packagers-list.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's next? People turning up on my doorstep, observing
ality stuff we can use as a
base (sort of like Ishikawa's initial work, but preferably closer to the
4.3.0-0ds* series, only without the regressions), more power to you. I
don't claim to be Branden's spokesman, but I really strongly doubt he'll
be working on 4.4 at the expense of
701 - 800 of 1229 matches
Mail list logo
