On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 09:36:31PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:52:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > [...] > > The bug submitter had already contacted the upstream maintainer of > > XTerm, and the patches had been rejected by him. Apparently, the > > submitter's goal was to get Debian to fork from upstream after the exact > > same change had been rejected upstream. > > If I follow you, Debian libtool must not be patched too.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/xfree86/xsf-repo/branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches% wc -l *
| tail -1 && ls -l | wc -l
106899 total
125
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org - http://www.kde.org - http://www.freedesktop.org
"What's next? People turning up on my doorstep, observing that the lack of
doorbell is likely to confuse people and hence removing my front door?"
-- David Woodhouse on usability efforts, Advogato
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
