t-get source pymol
> apt-get build-dep pymol
So fix pymol, its build-depends appear to be broken. If you can't figure
this out, you shouldn't be filing bugs about stuff like prelink and PIC.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Develope
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:02:26AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Die, 2003-01-14 at 00:06, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > In 4.3, all static libraries with no corresponding shared version are
> > built with PIC anyway,
>
> I know, but this is needed now, not whenever 4.3
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:41:12AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi scrawled:
> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > How about xft1 ?
> >>
> >> Xft is not built at all.
>
>
-get
> favor them instead of an older xlibmesa3 package?
glutg3-dev needs to Build-Depend on xlibmesa3-gl and/or xlibmesa3-glu,
or the relevant -dev packages.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourn
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:10:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> Thanks, fixed. Or I could imitate a silly Commonwealther and say "in
> future".
You're the one who typoed in the first place, seppo boy.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMA
ctrl-alt-backspace? If the system is hung, is an OOPS or anything logged
in /var/log/kern.log?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05334/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:00:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:27:11AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:01:00AM -0500, Jack Howarth scrawled:
> > > Daniel,
> > > If pymol build depends on glutg3-dev wh
do your
homework, unless you truly believe that i386 is the most important
architecture in Debian and that nothing else matters. If you support X
refusing to work at all on SPARC in a release, speak up! Otherwise (and
this is the most preferable option), shut up.
Scant regards,
Daniel
--
Dan
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 10:16:32PM +0100, Eduard Bloch scrawled:
> * Daniel Stone [Mon, Jan 20 2003, 07:42:02AM]:
>
> > > They do not ship with an old piece of shit as X (Version 4.1, not
> > > supporting any modern video card) while our X maintainer prefered to do
> &g
quot;, fpe->name);
>
> My guess is those explicit newlines don't need to be passed to
> NoticeF().
>
> Extra points for merging a patch for the above into patch #003.
>
> Otherwise, I'll get to it when I can. There are some major chan
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don't recall off the
> top of my head how well the old S3 Trio chips are supported by the
> version of XFree86 4.x in woody (Debian 3.0).
They&#
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:42:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:52:03AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:48:14AM -0600, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > > Try changing the driver you use to "s3", though I don'
quot;, fpe->name);
>
> My guess is those explicit newlines don't need to be passed to
> NoticeF().
>
> Extra points for merging a patch for the above into patch #003.
203 occurrences between NoticeF, ErrorF, Error and FatalError. No
thanks.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05435/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ricorn.woot.net/~daniels/current/sid/$(ARCH) ./
deb ftp://ftp.cs.umn.edu/pub/debian-misc/daniels/xfree86/current/sid/$(ARCH) ./
for both i386 and powerpc if you want to give them a bash; currently
they're missing libXft1 (deliberate), but this will come back in the
4.2.99.4
27;ve been talking with
XFree86 upstream people, and we apparently need 3.2.1 or later, and even
then code generation is broken in some cases. Funnily enough, we have
3.2.2 pre-something.
*shrug*,
d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05469/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ewing this stuff, and provide a backtrace?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05478/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
list for
> their attention; they will reply in due course.
>
> [...]
I of course meant http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.1/Status.html, not 4.2.0.
I can't believe I made a mistake in a bug that simple. Please don't hurt
me, nice Mr. XFree86 Maintai
See
<http://www.xfree86.org/4.1.0/Status.html> for information on its support for
your particular hardware.
Clearly, s/4\.1\.0/4.2.0/. Please don't get the Sodomotron.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of
;s xlibmesa packages, and hence the 4 in my 4.2.99.x
xlibmesa packages, reflects the major version of Mesa used.
I hope this message gets through, because I CANNOT SEND MAIL TO THE
LISTS, AND IT IS REALLY STARTING TO IRK ME. master swallows it and it
disappears.
--
Daniel Stone
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:16:38AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon scrawled:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:00:23AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The 3 in 4.2.1's xlibmesa packages, and hence the 4 in my 4.2.99.x
> > xlibmesa packages, reflects the major version of Mesa used.
&g
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:23:07AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon scrawled:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:21:22AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > uhm... why? That doesn't make any sense at all.
> >
> > Hysterical raisins, presumably.
>
> The raisins explain t
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:31:36AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon scrawled:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:26:05AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I'm not having packages with a misleading name. I'm keeping up status
> > quo until I see a good reason to change current (and expect
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:53:08AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 00:26, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:23:07AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon scrawled:
> > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:21:22AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > &g
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:23:16AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon scrawled:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:16:40AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Why the Mesa packages carry a 3 is also historical baggage and most
> > > people seem to be unaware why that 3 is there in the firs
James Greenhalgh, Ross Drinkwater, and most of the rest
of the regular #debian-kde crew for being my guinea pigs and downloading
a staggering amount of debs, all in the name of getting it right.
* Julien Goodwin, for lending me his HPPA, even though I couldn't get
> xfree? If you think this might be a good idea, I'd be happy to help.
I've got xlibmesa4-drm-src working in my local -2 tree, the fact that
the 'xfree86-dri-source' package exists is a total snafu. I flogged the
code for that from Michel (as
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:57:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:15:10AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > xlibmesa3-gl suggests that it's Mesa version 3. Which it isn't.
>
> Well, yes, actually I think it is:
>
> From: David D
pen with any Radeon
> card at least.
Kevin Puetz has reported success with my 4.2.99.x packages, built with
gcc 3.2[1], on a Radeon 7500.
:) d
[1]: They aren't built with 3.2 by default (long story), but he built
them locally with 3.2.
--
Daniel Stone &
gt;
> Thanks, Bdale!
This patch is, FWIW, unnecessary for my packages: a different fix (with
the same effect, however), was applied upstream, sometime before
4.2.99.4.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbou
.. well, major, right?
> > > Well, I am trying to get work done, with packages that have a
> > > relationship to those in question, and I think it's unnecessarily
> > > hard, for no good reason.
> >
> > What's hard about it?
>
> It breaks eve
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:42:46AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 09:33:13PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > This patch is, FWIW, unnecessary for my packages: a different fix (with
> > the same effect, however), was applied upstream, sometime befo
the one used by
> > XFree86, except by coincidence.
>
> So the Mesa version needs to be engraved in the package name, no matter
> how irrelevant it is? Why don't you add the versions of gcc, glibc, ...
> then? ;)
Yeah, so we'll change the package names to gcc2.72, gcc
actively but more often when left
> > running xlock.
>
> This usually happens because one of the modes of xlock (or xscreensaver)
> manages to tickle a bug in the video driver.
>
> Are you using xlock with a particular mode, or just -mode rando
relevant to those packages as the Mesa version number is to xlibmesa.
I agree entirely with Branden: if the changes are irrelevant, why does
upstream keep bumping the *major* revision number?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity Coll
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:37:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 11:17:06AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > Duh, gcc obviously needs _its own_ version in the package name. I was
&
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 03:33:07PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Sam, 2003-02-08 at 01:17, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:04:18AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > Duh, gcc obviously needs _its own_ version in the package name. I was
> > &g
; this.
>
> Read your description, and note my emphasis?
Oh, a typo. Please be more clear in future.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05766/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
icate bug), not at
all.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05768/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:51:53PM +1100, Herbert Xu scrawled:
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You obviously don't understand how Debian's packaging system works.
> > Please come back when you understand the fact that all binary packages
> > car
e unstripped as xserver-xfree86-dbg.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05779/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t; It comes from the reference implementation for OpenGL 1.2, and to the
> best of my knowledge, its version number is 1.3.
The. Major. Version. Of. Mesa. In. XFree86. Is. Three.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05788/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:58:12PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:01:20PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The. Major. Version. Of. Mesa. In. XFree86. Is. Three.
>
> Ahem, only in XFree86 4.2.1.
>
> Precision in expression is key, Daniel-san.
59:42
> > > 2003
> > > (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
> > > Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb'
ObOffTopic4.3Reference: This file is now useless in 4.2.99.x, it's all
done inside the server. Yay!
:) d
--
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 01:46:56PM +0100, Frank Murphy scrawled:
> Or is there another reason for xserver-xfree86 only recommending xfonts-base?
The fact all your fonts can be served from a remote location with xfs?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PRO
work).
>
> I might have done something wrong, but to get direct rendering working
> on my radeon I have to use both (4.2.99.x with dri-snapshot drm modules).
Try installing my xlibmesa4-dri package, and then building the
xlibmesa4-drm-src package (again, fr
s
> not installed?
Because you can still have a flawlessly working X system without it?
Hell, you could run KDE if you liked.
> if x-window-system is a meta-package that installs
> xserver-xfree86, what is the equivalent package to
> x-window-system that gets xserver-mach32 installed, or
r about dselect wanting
> to use gnome caused dselect, and apt, to not be able to
> proceed on the other removes-and-installs).
You probably should be consistent with the tools you use to manage your
packages.
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
msg05900/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
erver-xfree86 and xlibmesa4-drm-src will work properly with Radeons
resuming. Thanks for all your work!
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, and it would take
> a lot of time to track down. I will probably let this problem be fixed
> by 4.3.0-1 instead of 4.2.1-7.
Yes, because the xkb in 4.3.0 is the best-quality xkb we've ever seen.
:)
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
a file missing in -0ds1 which didn't show up in my
testing; I'll hopefully have -0ds2 out today to correct this problem.
Thanks for the report!
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ng in my Radeon VE (radeon.o)? The one that comes
> with the kernel appears not to work. All I get is a black window when I
> run glxgears.
This is due to broken gcc3.2 MMX code generation, so there's not a lot
we can do about it, unfortunately.
--
Daniel Stone
g else relevant? Using reportbug on the 'xserver-xfree86'
package (which is the correct package for this class of bug), will do
this for you.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp
elogging
it, and not actually doing it. Make it non-recursive while I'm at it.
Building now,
d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:24:22AM +0900, YAMASHITA Junji scrawled:
> XFree86 Version 4.2.1.1 (Debian 4.2.1-6pre7v1 20030303063037 branden@) / X Window
> System
Is that the exact version string? Looks like something's broken
("branden@"
h needs to include Xlib.h for things depending on it to work;
thanks to Xavier Bestel for the report.
Thanks for the report!
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
y-manager is an alternative created by any of the display
managers - gdm, xdm, kdm, etc.
As such, none of them are shipped with any of the actual XFree86
packages.
Hope that helps,
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, Univer
onf
is the equivalent to running something like xf86config, only it has a
nice, unified frontend.
> Is it not true that these should be accounted for?
I don't see any reason why they should, no. Just creates headaches -
what if you don't use Debconf to create them?
--
Daniel Stone
orrect (i.e., is specific to GNU sed),
I'll have a workable version in patch #175.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ote all the Xfree86
> configuration files when I installed the new version.
> I'm just wondering if anyone knows what happened
> and/or how I can fix it.
We can't support what you don't package; if you insist on using binaries
created by someone other than us, then you
binary-only and contain no source, we are unable to
distribute them with the Debian packages, unfortunately.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ages at http://penguinppc.org/~daniels/README.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/info/xdm.postinst? Is
kdm still installed?
It doesn't render the package unusable, BTW - a simple
/etc/init.d/ start, will give you your desktop
back, so I'm tagging this back to important.
Oh, and xdm not starting will never prevent you from using kdm.
--
Daniel Stone
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 01:22:21AM +0100, Chris Searle scrawled:
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel> On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 02:39:39PM +0100, Chris Searle
> Daniel> scrawled:
> >>
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 12:52:39PM +0200, Chris Searle scrawled:
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Daniel> Hmm, looks like Debconf is playing funny buggers, if this
> Daniel> is the full and complete output of
upposed to have better acceleration and everything. I would much
> apreciate any help in getting that acceleration. Thank you.
If you could post not only your full XF86Config-4, but your full
XFree86.0.log, this would help immensely - there are large chunks
missing from the log which may pr
Thanks for your report. The i845g chipset is only supported in XFree86
4.3; preliminary XFree86 4.3 packages for Debian can be found at
http://penguinppc.org/~daniels/README.
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of
he time to the sarge release be to short for that ?
Package it in an external repository for the time being, and release it
out to sid when 4.3.0 hits sid; there's really no other way to do it.
Ralf Nolden has done a woody backport of my packages, but IIRC sarge is
glibc 2.3 now, so the si
en an xterm, and try to type into
> it, i get some garbage characters (either just a c, or a succession of
> cs). Is this a known bug or something ?
Not that I know of, and certainly not without more info.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:41:57PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 12:18:08PM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> > > Why not just upload it to sid (it is already in the NEW queue btw), it
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:21:31PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Well, considering 4.3.0 only runs on i386/powerpc/sparc/ia64/alpha at
> > the moment, and s390/hurd-i386 support is in the works, it still has
0ds3v2 (patch merge from hell - 4.3
branch, bits of HEAD, plus Michel's Radeon DDC patch), along with the
other 3 I haven't even written yet. *sigh*.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:21:13PM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:49:27PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > That means that we'll be unable to support the version in sid, then.
>
> No, why, it only is a problem right now because we are one version
11R6/lib/libGLU.so.1-lGL
Thanks Marco; I'll check this out and fix it for 4.3 if applicable, too.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:12:09AM +0200, Marco d'Itri scrawled:
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.so.1-lGL
Hold on, doesn't this render the entire -gl/-glu fix moot?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, Univ
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:32:09AM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:53:12AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Well, if we were were working on 4.3.0, 4.2.1 wouldn't be as well
> > supported as it is: it takes quite an amount of work to support, and
>
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:28:41AM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 05:06:49PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Well, the problem is, you're always going to have problems. Until
> > upstream patched it a couple of days ago, X didn't work on ia64,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:44:15AM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:04:01PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > xserver-xfree86-dbg ran. xserver-xfree86 didn't. I talked to mharris and
> > upstream about it, and no-one really had any idea, so we passed it
&g
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:33:40PM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:10:09PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > i386, powerpc, alpha - these are the architectures I have access to.
> > sparc and ia64 also usually get built, but I don't have direct access to
Ah, right. Sorry, brainfart.
> Anyway, why not simply drop xlibmesa*-glu, seeing as they are the same
> thing as libglu1-mesa, except that they tend to be more buggy?
Really not my decision, tbh.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, T
val purposes.
Branden Robinson has the patch and is handling the DSA for woody; I
understnad he is also handling the 4.3 upload for sid. Branden?
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system htt
00406160839" is. Whoever shipped that package is the
> proper recipient of your bug report.)
Ehm, while it's a decent general rule, the bug here clearly applies to
all versions of XFree86, so there's no reason to tell them to go file
a bug report somewhere else.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 12:50:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:12:07PM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Yes, "somehow". You don't provide any code, or anything be
AIL PROTECTED]>:
host necrotic.deadbeast.net [216.37.46.189]: 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sender address rejected: Access denied
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ications to public lists. I am
sorry that it has come to this where we cannot even co-operate on issues
as critical to Debian as security vulnerabilites in the standard X
implementations (which, it should be mentioned, are far from
hypothetical).
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
st you pick which of Composite or GLX you want.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
er it's in /usr, or it's in /usr/X11R6.
Branden, would you like me to make an upload, fixing this and also
updating to the latest Render/Xrender versions, as I have already done
for Ubuntu?
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the server and provide us a gdb back trace.
>
> This is the first time it occurred (I couldn't find any other report
> in my mail archives). I also looked for a core file (even though it
> wouldn't really be useful without the debugging version), but there
> was none.
nform the
> user that he can let this entries blank if he has a monitor capable of DDC.
Yes, and I believe these questions should not even be asked per default.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:24:57PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:57:31AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 12:50:11PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I would recomend that the X debconf questions about monitor frequencies
> &g
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:23:19AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > amd64, i386 and powerpc have working DDC probe support (the former two
>
> Nope, powerpc has not, it seems to be only some way of getting the informa
ia driver in XFree86/current X.Org
supports around 20% of the stock Via chipsets out there, the revamped
'unichrome' driver which will probably be merged into X.Org supports
maybe 30% of the stock Via chipsets out there, and there is little if
any intersection between the two
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:15:31PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 07:47:17AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:23:19AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 12:29:53PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:46:10AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:15:31PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > As we are going to deploy an amount of pegasos machines running debian in
> &g
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 03:27:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:47:45AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I don't mean to devalue Pegasos in any way, but my assertion that you
> > can, in the general case, extract EDID data from PowerPC machines was
&
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 06:39:00PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 07:50:31AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Again, I ask: are you suggesting that because some small majority of
> > cases cannot support resolution autodetection (but gracefully fail),
> > th
for this chipset ?
>
> FYI, this chipset is used in professional desktop sold lately (Dell
> Optiplex Gx280, HP/Compaq 7000 series).
XFree86 does not support this, only X.Org.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 02:51:51PM +0100, Fabrice LORRAIN (home) wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 11:54:28PM +0100, Fabrice LORRAIN (home) wrote:
> >>On an up to date sid box
> >>/usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/changelog.Debian.gz isn't very
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 04:56 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> + * Security upload: further fixes to the libXpm issues reported in
> +CAN-2004-0687 and CAN-2004-0688, and fixed in 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6ubuntu18.
> +Similar integer overflow vulnerabilities have discovered and fixed
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 11:03 +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:09:31AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >> I guess we can do it now. xprt (xfree86) does not work and Fabio was
> >> already prepared to remove it now before sarge.
> >
> > Of course, neither does xprt-
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 12:20:01AM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> I made my own HEAD grabbing of the i810 driver to have a working
> i82915G (included in Dell GX280 as integrated card). I replaced the
> whole 000_stolen_from_HEAD_i810 patch with sources from HEAD, but
> since I did
201 - 300 of 1229 matches
Mail list logo
