On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 04:14:36 +, Robert Ancell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to fix the -dev package names in libxcb - they currently have a
> version number on them which is not correct. The git branch for libxcb
> seems to be owned by collab-maint - should that be changed to pkg-xorg?
>
> I
Gedaan met tijd verliezen aan de verwerking van uw post. Dankzij de
frankeermachine bespaart u niet alleen tijd, maar ook geld!
Vind de beste leverancier:
http://www.debesteleverancier.be/frankeermachine/gratis-offerte.htm?lng=nl&tg=frama&utm_campaign=frama&utm_source=admr&utm_medium=email&you=deb
As agreed with Julien, I'll NMU the attached patch (which is current git
fix)
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150811084853.ga20...@type.bordeaux
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 11 Aug 2015 10:48:53 +0200, a écrit :
> As agreed with Julien, I'll NMU the attached patch (which is current git
> fix)
Grmbl, here is really the patch.
Samuel
diff -u xorg-server-1.17.2/debian/changelog xorg-server-1.17.2/debian/changelog
--- xorg-server-1.17.2/debian/cha
xorg-server_1.17.2-1.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.17.2-1.1.dsc
xorg-server_1.17.2-1.1.diff.gz
xdmx-tools_1.17.2-1.1_amd64.deb
xdmx_1.17.2-1.1_amd64.deb
xnest_1.17.2-1.1_amd64.deb
xorg-server-source_1.17.2-1.1_all.deb
xserver-co
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:40:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794644: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.17.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #794644,
regarding xorg-server: FTBFS on hurd-i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:45:35 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-xorg-core-dbg xserver-common
xorg-server-source x
Package: libgl1-mesa-glx
Version: 10.6.3-1
Severity: important
Hello,
I did an aptitude upgrade yetserday
and got:
Will install 527 packages, and remove 10 packages.
257 MB of disk space will be used
ok, so did it. seems it had some major changes like:
[INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] linux-image-4.0.0-
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:55:11 +0200, Axel VITTECOQ wrote:
> Package: libgl1-mesa-glx
> Version: 10.6.3-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hello,
>
> I did an aptitude upgrade yetserday
> and got:
>
> Will install 527 packages, and remove 10 packages.
> 257 MB of disk space
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #795167 [libgl1-mesa-glx] libgl1-mesa-glx: libGL.so.1 cannot be found
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
795167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795167
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBS
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:55:11 +0200, Axel VITTECOQ wrote:
>
> > Package: libgl1-mesa-glx
> > Version: 10.6.3-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I did an aptitude upgrade yetserday
> >
debian/changelog |7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 7b5adadc91e4083c3097dd096d41fd0ebad4efed
Author: Julien Cristau
Date: Tue Aug 11 11:51:09 2015 +0200
Import 2:1.17.2-1.1 NMU
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 994d10b
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libxt6
Bug #793295 [libxaw7] xterm: Menu font is too small on high-dpi screen
Bug reassigned from package 'libxaw7' to 'libxt6'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #793295 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed ver
Control: retitle -1 XtDefaultFont is too small on HiDPI screens
On 2015-08-11 17:10:46 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Let's go further: after testing with xman (another program based on
> libxaw7), I've noticed that other libxaw7 objects are affected and
> even more. Everything solved by setting
Control: reassign -1 libxt6
On 2015-08-10 19:01:11 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> menus are done by libxaw7 (will reassign).
Let's go further: after testing with xman (another program based on
libxaw7), I've noticed that other libxaw7 objects are affected and
even more. Everything solved by settin
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 XtDefaultFont is too small on HiDPI screens
Bug #793295 [libxt6] xterm: Menu font is too small on high-dpi screen
Changed Bug title to 'XtDefaultFont is too small on HiDPI screens' from 'xterm:
Menu font is too small on high-dpi screen'
--
793295: http:
Hello,
Dunno why I have such package (AMD related) installed because my graphics
are Intel based.
(strange because only i386 versions were installed)
according to your hints,
I did
Aptitude 0.6.11: log report
> Tue, Aug 11 2015 18:15:00 +0200
> IMPORTANT: this log only lists intended actions;
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:30:49 +0200
with message-id <20150811173049.gn3...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#795167: libgl1-mesa-glx: libGL.so.1 cannot be found
has caused the Debian Bug report #795167,
regarding libgl1-mesa-glx: libGL.so.1 cannot be found
to be marked
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
Version: 1:1.0.11-1
This is a stubborn bug across both Wheezy and now into Jessie. I run a PowerMac
G5, dual 2.0 GHz (PowerMac 7,2) with an Apple-branded Nvidia GeForce 6800 Ultra
card with 256 MB memory.
In Wheezy, I was lucky enough to have Wheezy generate
You said "it's not worth the trouble" - I don't think it's any signficant
trouble...
There's no transition required that I know of - all existing packages will
continue to build fine using the transitional libxcb-util0-dev package and
over time build-dependencies will be updated and this package c
Hi Julien,
The work is already done in this patch - do you see any ongoing issues?
Reasons I see for doing the renaming:
- It's confusing for users to work out the name of the -dev packages to
install.
- It gives the incorrect impression you can install multiple -dev packages.
- It means each tim
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 21:43:39 +, Robert Ancell wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> The work is already done in this patch - do you see any ongoing issues?
>
All the reverse dependencies would need changes too.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 12.08.2015 00:35, Robert Ancell wrote:
> You said "it's not worth the trouble" - I don't think it's any
> signficant trouble...
No I just ignored the simple fact that the update bumped soname, so what
you did was absolutely correct.. oops
> There's no transition required that I know of - all e
No, the reverse dependencies don't need updating due to the transitional
packages. Over time they should be updated but there's no pressure to rush
it.
--Robert
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:00 AM Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 21:43:39 +, Robert Ancell wrote:
>
> > Hi Julien
24 matches
Mail list logo
