On 12.08.2015 00:35, Robert Ancell wrote: > You said "it's not worth the trouble" - I don't think it's any > signficant trouble...
No I just ignored the simple fact that the update bumped soname, so what you did was absolutely correct.. oops > There's no transition required that I know of - all existing packages > will continue to build fine using the transitional libxcb-util0-dev > package and over time build-dependencies will be updated and this > package can be removed. It's marked as oldlibs/extra so the automatic > tools will pick this up. guess you're right, and I should not intervene in these matters until feeling capable :) -- t -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55ca6d3c.7040...@debian.org
