Bug#582482: Dist-upgrade leads to compiz not starting

Package: compiz Version: 0.8.4-4 Severity: critical Tags: squeeze sid Justification: breaks unrelated software To whom it may concern. After a dist-upgrade compiz refuses to start. Below is the message and my debugging. #:/$ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose compiz --replace --debug compiz (core) - Debug: Co

Bug#582482: Dist-upgrade leads to compiz not starting

bts severity 582482 important thank you On 21/05/2010 08:45, Brent Clark wrote: > Package: compiz > Version: 0.8.4-4 > Severity: critical > Tags: squeeze sid > Justification: breaks unrelated software > Seriously, no. A computer works perfectly fine without compiz. It even works fine without

Processed: severity of 582482 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 582482 important Bug #582482 [compiz] Dist-upgrade leads to compiz not starting Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 582482: http://bugs.debian.org/

Bug#582482: Dist-upgrade leads to compiz not starting

On 21/05/2010 10:58, Brent Clark wrote: > On 21/05/2010 09:48, Brice Goglin wrote: >> I am seeing the same messages and Compiz works fine. What did you >> upgrade when things broke? Did you recently switch to KMS/DRI2 for >> instance? Please send your Xorg.0.log. >> >> Brice >> > > Thanks for l

Bug#582482: Dist-upgrade leads to compiz not starting

On 21/05/2010 09:48, Brice Goglin wrote: I am seeing the same messages and Compiz works fine. What did you upgrade when things broke? Did you recently switch to KMS/DRI2 for instance? Please send your Xorg.0.log. Brice Thanks for looking. Kind Regards Brent Clark X.Org X Server 1.7.7 Rel

Re: Ubuntu X plans for the next release

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 17:53:37 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > Hi all, > > I understand that it Bryce's habit to give the Debian XSF a heads up on > the plans that Ubuntu have for the X stack each release. As Bryce is > off hacking on Launchpad this release, I'll be responsible

Bug#582482: Dist-upgrade leads to compiz not starting

On 21/05/2010 11:51, Brice Goglin wrote: On 21/05/2010 10:58, Brent Clark wrote: On 21/05/2010 09:48, Brice Goglin wrote: I am seeing the same messages and Compiz works fine. What did you upgrade when things broke? Did you recently switch to KMS/DRI2 for instance? Please send your Xor

Bug#582482: marked as done (Dist-upgrade leads to compiz not starting)

Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2010 13:40:13 +0200 with message-id <4bf6711d.6090...@ens-lyon.org> and subject line Re: Bug#582482: Dist-upgrade leads to compiz not starting has caused the Debian Bug report #582482, regarding Dist-upgrade leads to compiz not starting to be marked as done. This mea

xserver-xorg-video-glide: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

debian/README.source |2 +- debian/changelog |6 ++ debian/control|4 ++-- debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk | 35 ++- 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) New commits: commit 044a4bacdeaaa2c6bd3946fb1f241145d36348da Author: Julien

xserver-xorg-video-glide: Changes to 'refs/tags/xserver-xorg-video-glide-1.0.3-2'

Tag 'xserver-xorg-video-glide-1.0.3-2' created by Julien Cristau at 2010-05-21 14:41 + Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-video-glide 1.0.3-2 to unstable. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJL9puhAAoJEDEBgAUJBeQMWr8P/0GTmmBPC4O+eziG4rW81DXu Ogx7ejvMvi

Processing of xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2_i386.changes

xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2.dsc xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2.diff.gz xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.de

xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2.diff.gz to main/x/xserver-xorg-video-glide/xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2.diff.gz xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2.dsc to main/x/xserver-xorg-video-glide/xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2.dsc xserver-xorg-video-glide_1.0.3-2_i386.deb to main/x/xs

Bug#582566: xserver-xorg: bell settings (xset -b) not preserved after suspend/resume

Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.5+6 Severity: normal If I type "xset -b" to disable the bell, suspend my laptop (with Fn-F1), and resume, the bell is no longer disabled and it makes a horrible sound. -- Package-specific info: /var/lib/x11/X.roster does not exist. /var/lib/x11/X.md5sum does no

Bug#561008: console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f future' symbols look different before and after X

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:09:21 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > But it's also OK to have the framebuffer console running at the LCD > optimal resolution (that is to say: no special kernel parameter). > > Anyway, what's not too nice is the fact that the screen is briefly > blanked during the boot

Processed: bug 551387 is forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28204

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 551387 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28204 Bug #551387 [xserver-xorg-video-intel] [GM965] GPU hangs Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28204'. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Re: Ubuntu X plans for the next release

On 2010-05-21 12:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 17:53:37 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > >> We'll be on a 2.6.35 kernel, so we'll have the new 0.0.16 nouveau ABI >> which will be reflected in our libdrm packages. >> > Now that linux 2.6.34 is in experimen

Re: libdrm: Changes to 'ubuntu'

On 2010-05-14 22:16 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:16:03 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> On 2010-05-14 20:27 +0200, Robert Hooker wrote: >> >> > libdrm (2.4.20-2ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low >> > >> > - * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes: >> > + * Mer