On 2010-05-14 22:16 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:16:03 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2010-05-14 20:27 +0200, Robert Hooker wrote:
>>
>> > libdrm (2.4.20-2ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low
>> >
>> > - * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes:
>> > + * Merge from debian experimental, remaining changes:
>> > - Dropped patches:
>> > 02_fix_kms_detection_with_linux_backport_modules.diff - Obsolete
>> > 03_revert_abi_change.diff - Obsolete
>> > 04_git_nouveau_fix_sigsegv_in_nouveau_bo_new_tile.patch - Upstream
>> > + * Refresh libdrm-nouveau1 symbols
>>
>> You will get interesting segfaults in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (and
>> other rdepends of libdrm-nouveau1, if there are any) after this ABI
>> break without soname bump. Anyone who has a bright idea what to do
>> about that problem?
>>
> Two solutions, afaict:
> Breaks: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (<< some-version)
We can use some-version = 0.0.16 to reflect the ABI break. Any versions
of xserver-xorg-video-nouveau that might get uploaded to sid before the
Squeeze release will have to start with 0.0.15 then.
> or changing the package name to libdrm-nouveau1with2.6.34abi (well, ok,
> not that one, but you get the idea).
> There probably aren't any other rdepends at this point since we don't
> build the 3d driver yet, so Breaks seems easiest.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87eih478d8....@turtle.gmx.de
