On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Brice Goglin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 06:28:52PM +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg-core
> > Version: 2:1.4.1~git20080131-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Laptop screens backlights are turned off these days by getting acpi to
> > intercept the lid button
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.8.0-1
> Severity: normal
>
> After starting X, VTs 1-6 don't work - attempting to switch into them
> causes the monitor to go into powersave. Nothing
> crashes though - pressing Ctrl+Alt+F7 brings it back to X.
>
Please tr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> reassign 430067 xserver-xorg-video-mach64
Bug#430067: xserver-xorg: mplayer causes xserver crash
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-video-ati' to
`xserver-xorg-video-mach64
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
> Version: 2:2.2.1-1
> Severity: important
>
> On my system (Dell D620) since the last (maybe second-last, but probably
> not) upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-intel the X server randomly crashes
> when a program switches to full screen mode.
> I
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Can you try xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.2.99.901-1 from experimental first?
>
Oh, and if it still crashes, please catch a full debugging backtrace
with gdb -p $(pidof X) from another machine after installing
xserver-xorg-video-intel-dbg and xserver-xorg-core-dbg. This way,
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:18:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#471998: Compiz fails to decorate windows without
libcompizconfig0
has caused the Debian Bug report #471998,
regarding Compiz fails to decorate windows without libcompizconfig0
to be mar
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:07:24PM +0100, Bert Verbeek wrote:
> Op Sunday 13 January 2008, schreef Brice Goglin:
> > Bert and Ties,
> > you might want to try adding
> > Option "NoDDC" "true"
> > to section Device in xorg.conf and see if that helps.
>
> It helps indeed for me,
> uptill now its
On 3/22/08, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> > Version: 1:6.8.0-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > After starting X, VTs 1-6 don't work - attempting to switch into them
> > causes the monitor to go into powersave. Nothing
> > crashe
On Mar 22, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the problem so easy to reproduce?
It happens every few days to me.
> Can you try xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.2.99.901-1 from experimental first?
I will install it tomorrow.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
xorg-server_1.4.99.901-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.4.99.901-2.dsc
xorg-server_1.4.99.901-2.diff.gz
xprint-common_1.4.99.901-2_all.deb
xserver-xorg-core_1.4.99.901-2_i386.deb
xserver-xorg-dev_1.4.99.901-2_i386.deb
xdmx_1.4.99.901-
Accepted:
xdmx-tools_1.4.99.901-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.4.99.901-2_i386.deb
xdmx_1.4.99.901-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.4.99.901-2_i386.deb
xnest_1.4.99.901-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.4.99.901-2_i386.deb
xorg-server_1.4.99.901-2.
Your message dated Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#471663: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.4.99.901-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #471663,
regarding xorg-server_2:1.4.99.901-1(experimental/ia64/alkman): Missing include
to be marked as done.
T
severity 472180 grave
kthxbye
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 14:33:04 +, Gavin Bravery wrote:
> On starting the xprint service, the CPU climbs to 100% and sits there.
> Most of the time is being spent processing the Xprt requests.
>
I'm curious: why do you use xprint? :)
Cheers,
Julien
--
To U
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 472180 grave
Bug#472180: Xprt hogging CPU.
Severity set to `grave' from `serious'
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:53:37 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 22:13 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > from hw/xfree86/exa/examodule.c:
> > if (xf86IsOptionSet(pScreenPriv->options, EXAOPT_NO_COMPOSITE)) {
> > xf86DrvMsg(pScreen->myNum, X_INFO,
> >
Package: xorg-server
Version: 2:1.4.99.901-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Forwarded: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15169
http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=xorg-server&ver=2%3A1.4.99.901-1&arch=alpha&stamp=1206153477&file=log&as=raw
This
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.19
> forwarded 472205 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15169
Bug#472205: xorg-server: FTBFS on alpha in hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/axpPci.c
Noted your statement that Bug has be
Carry yourself with confidence and assurance with your new monster tool.
http://www.Fisterroot.com/
You Don't Need To Inherit Good Genes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 inches is inadequate to pleasure your woman add inches now.
http://www.cratestuy.com/
One Stop Shop for All Your Needs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xprint
Version: 2:1.4.99.901-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
On starting the xprint service, the CPU climbs to 100% and sits there.
Most of the time is being spent processing the Xprt requests.
An strace on the process shows repeated messages like thi
Le 5310 Septembre 1993, Brice Goglin a envoyé:
> Daniel Dehennin wrote:
> You might want to check that the kernel isn't involved here, just in
> case...
The same for 2.6.23.1, I'll give a try to a debian linux--image.
> 6.7.197 has been in unstable during 2 months before 6.8.0 arrived. Any
> chan
> /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/fr contains an old version of the Bépo
> keymap: it lists version 6.2.1.1 (which I believe actually refers to
> 0.6.2.1.1) but the current upstream version is 0.6.4. Since the
> changes are not only cosmetic (the Y and H letters have been
> swapped, for instance), I su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ok, I started my laptop, logged in via ssh and started xev.
The output for xev running about 1 second is attached.
Please note that I did not press any key while xev was running.
I hope this helps.
Greetings,
Erik Andresen
- --
"I am opposed to mil
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.2-5
Severity: important
My package (nxcl[0]) FTBFS on the alpha buildd because x11-common doesn't
install in the buildd. The relevant log entry is:
Setting up x11-common (7.3+10) ...
tempnam: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing x11-common (-
Dont feel insecure because your weener is tiny, when you can change that in
just weeks.
http://www.raredmeh.com/
Achieve the size you always wanted
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> This is due to both drivers using the same AtomBIOS symbol names, but
> apparently incompatible versions of the code.
I am not sure this will ever be fixed. Having 2 drivers for the same
boards should just be a temporary solution. I don't care how radeonhd
and ati get merg
Amazing 10-20% gains in girth achieved over just a few weeks.
http://www.cratestuy.com/
Live in harmony with 2 wives
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 17:55 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:53:37 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 22:13 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > from hw/xfree86/exa/examodule.c:
> > > if (xf86IsOptionSet(pScreenPriv->options, EXAOPT_NO_COMPOSIT
28 matches
Mail list logo
