On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 04:34:55PM -0700, Xin Liu wrote:
> There is a typo in the rules file. Actually this should be:
> --with-encodingsdir=\$${datadir}/fonts/X11/encodings
Yes, that bit got fixed too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hmm, this was supposed to have been fixed in xserver-xorg 1:7.0.11 by
> > removing the symlink in question. :/ So there are two bugs here --
> > xserver-xorg needs to drop the symlink, and x11-common needs to bu
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 08:06:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362868: xserver-xorg-core: Cannot load GLcore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
I've done libxp to my satisfaction and uploaded it.
Hopefully it'll be accepted by the time you wake up, though proto/print
will need to get through NEW before it can be used.
Drew
p.s. I think you need to put dh_installdeb *after* dh_makeshlibs in
libxrender (and others?)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: xserver-xorg-video-s3
Version: 1:1.8.6.5-2
xserver-xorg-video-s3, unlike all the other video drivers, does not
Provides: xserver-xorg-video, so it alone cannot satisfy the video
driver Depends in xserver-xorg or xserver-xorg-core.
- Josh Triplett
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: serious
Hello,
I cannot upgrade the package on my system because it repeatedly fails
with:
rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
x11-common postinst error: Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet
empty
dpkg: error processing x11-common (--
Package: xutils-dev
Version: 1:1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The .cf files added back into xutils-dev in 1:1.0.2-1 are still broken wrt
the FHS: they still generate makefiles which install binaries (and other
files) to /usr/X11R6, meaning there is an implicit conflict with the new
x11-comm
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:00:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362885: x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir:
/usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.11
Architecture: i396
In case anyone else is looking at this bug for ideas...
I'm having the same symptoms, but it's not #362296.
I had an xorg.conf file that listed "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/*",
but the fonts moved to /usr/share/fonts/X11/*. The only
things in the
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:47:29AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I cannot upgrade the package on my system because it repeatedly fails
> with:
> rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
> x11-common postinst error: Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet
> empty
> dpkg: error processing x11-
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.0-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
xinitrc tries to run twm/xterm (which may not exist) from
/usr/lib/X11/xinit/xinitrc. In case there is some other window manager
or terminal emulator, it makes sense to execute those.
--- xinitrc.orig2006-04-16 13:19:
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package xserver-xorg fails to install on my system with the following
messages:
Setting up xserver-xorg (7.0.12) ...
dpkg: error processing xserver-xorg (--configure):
subprocess post-installation sc
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi X maintainers!
It seems that the font organization is completely crazy now:
- X cannot find the fixed font anymore:
The fixed enty in fonts.alias in /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc is not
included in t
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:13:43PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> It seems that the font organization is completely crazy now:
> - X cannot find the fixed font anymore:
> The fixed enty in fonts.alias in /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc is not
> included in the fonts.dir file
> - there are still tw
#include
* Steve Langasek [Sun, Apr 16 2006, 01:19:35AM]:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:47:29AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > I cannot upgrade the package on my system because it repeatedly fails
> > with:
>
> > rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
> > x11-common postinst error: Could no
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:18:44PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Steve Langasek [Sun, Apr 16 2006, 01:19:35AM]:
> > To expand on Daniel's closure message: X11R6 is dead, and this directory
> > needs to be removed so it can be replaced with a compatibility symlink.
> > Otherwise, the t
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.12
Hello,
there are some more packages which install files to /usr/X11R6 and thus
probably need to be conflicted. Some of those packages are in
unstable/non-free, some are not in unstable anymore but in stable and
thus could probably lead to problems when upgrad
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-16 09:55:38 -0400 (Sun, 16 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1817
Modified:
trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog
trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/xserver-xorg-core.NEWS
Log:
* Document how to get rid of error loading glcore (and other modules) in
NEWS
Package: xfonts-base
Version: 1:1.0.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
the pathes where the fonst are stored chanbed from yetserday to today
without notice!!! my x did not start up anymore
instead of the former /usr/libX11/fonts/ the fonts are now at
/usr/share/fonts/X11
Package: libxfont1
Version: 1:1.0.0-3.1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
In the change from monolith to modular, some XFont defines were altered,
e.g. BUILD_FREETYPE to XFONT_FREETYPE
I discovered it in the course of updating Xprint upstream, DanielS has
applied the patch (see https://bugs.freede
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-16 10:31:03 -0400 (Sun, 16 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1818
Removed:
trunk/util/xutils-dev/debian/patches/03_norman.diff
Modified:
trunk/util/xutils-dev/debian/changelog
trunk/util/xutils-dev/debian/patches/series
Log:
* Add 03_xutils-dev-FHS.diff and 04_xutils-
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 22:30 -0400, Ahmad Khayyat wrote:
>
> The output of LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo:
> name of display: :0.0
> libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 5.0.3 r200 (screen 0)
> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so
> libGL error: dlopen /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/
On 4/16/06, Thibaut VARENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xorg
> Followup-For: Bug #319689
Here's my Xorg.0.log file. One might notice that though I only
disabled the glx module, DRI is disabled:
(WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabled
HTH
T-Bone
--
Thibaut VARENE
http://www.parisc-lin
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:13:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362922: xfonts-base: font-pathes change without notice
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: xorg
Followup-For: Bug #319689
Hi
I have been experiencing the same symptoms on my Pegasos II with recent
kernels. Symptoms are as follows:
- When gdm starts up, X hogs the CPU and the screen remains blank or out
of sync range. It's impossible to switch to VTs, have to ssh into the
b
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 08:15 -0400, Chris Newbold wrote:
> Attached is the complete X server log from startup through the crash.
If this also happens with driver "nv" instead of "nvidia", it looks like
the atimisc driver is buggy wrt the XVideo extension.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | De
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-16 11:15:57 -0400 (Sun, 16 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1819
Added:
tags/util/xutils-dev/xutils-dev-1.0.2-2/
Log:
Tag upload of xutils-dev-1.0.2-2 to unstable
Copied: tags/util/xutils-dev/xutils-dev-1.0.2-2 (from rev 1818,
trunk/util/xutils-dev)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 21:58 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.5.7.3-3
> Severity: important
>
> Hello
>
> After upgrading and solving the already known bugs of an empty "which X"
> by linking it to /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg, I now end up with a crashing X
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 08:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362886: fixed in xutils-dev 1:1.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Le samedi 15 avril 2006 à 15:40 +0200, Michel Dänzer a écrit :
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 21:16 +0200, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
> > Package: libxv1
> > Version: 1:1.0.1-2
> > Severity: important
> >
> > When playing a movie, the picture stutters a lot, as if the video frames
> > were not displayed
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: normal
On powerpc, pmud-utils installs xmouse in /usr/X11R6/bin, so x11-common
needs to conflict with it.
I have pmud-utils version 0.10-9 installed.
I'm sure there are other powerpc-specific packages that should conflict as
well.
-- System Inform
I've run into this same issue. I have files from the following
packages in /usr/X11R6/bin:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dpkg -S /usr/X11R6/bin/*
dpkg: /usr/X11R6/bin/fontfs not found.
ghostview: /usr/X11R6/bin/ghostview
libmotif-dev: /usr/X11R6/bin/uil
I'm not sure where the fontfs file came from since
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
upgrading to xorg-xserver version 7.0.12 broke my system. GDM complains
because it cannot find xserver executable:
GDM: Xserver not found: /usr/X11R6/bin/X ...
ERROR: Command cannot be executed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362755 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#362755: xorg: not setting MTRR range register for framebuffer to
write-combining
Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> forwarded 362755 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5801
Bug#
> Package: libxfont1
>
> The attached patch needs to be applied to
> libxfont-1.0.0/src/fontfile/ffcheck.c.
>
> Since Debian has not reached 7.1 yet, it would be great if it could be
> backported to 7.0. Otherwise Xprint has to select generic fonts to print
> with, which is quitw ugly.
>
Pain
reassign 362755 xserver-xorg-core
forwarded 362755 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5801
severity 362755 important
reassign 362494 xserver-xorg-core
merge 362755 362494
kthxbye
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 17:38 +0200, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
> Le samedi 15 avril 2006 à 15:40 +0200, Michel
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-4
Severity: normal
Hi.
Since X11R7, i have no direct rendering with my Intel GMA i915. After
upgrating, I removed "Load"GLcore"" from xorg.conf. glxinfo reports:
"ERROR! sizeof(I830DRIRec) does not match passed size from device driver
libGL warni
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 362494 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5801
Bug#362494: libxv1: Bad video display with X.org modular libraries
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5801.
> merge 362755
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-4
Severity: normal
Hi.
Since X11R7, i have no direct rendering with my Intel GMA i915. After
upgrating, I removed "Load"GLcore"" from xorg.conf. glxinfo reports:
"ERROR! sizeof(I830DRIRec) does not match passed size from device driver
libGL warni
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.12
Followup-For: Bug #362891
In my case it fails in the pre-inst stage. I've been trying to figure it out
where it does but had no sucess. Here is the dpkg debug output.
D10: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci'
(Reading database ... 147306 fi
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Followup-For: Bug #354221
I have what sounds like the same bug. It's been present since x.org 6.9.0
Every time I boot x.org since then I can expect the system to freeze
within 5-10 minutes of starting X. No logs, machine can not be accessed over
the netwo
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Painfully, we may have to proceed without freetype support in Xprint
> after all.
AIUI, the non-freeness issue I raised on xorg-modular, would certainly
violate the DFSG?
> After applying the libxfont patch, Xprt is able to start, an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362944 xserver-xorg-video-i810,libgl1-mesa-dri
Bug#362944: xserver-xorg-core: no direct rendering with intel i915
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-core' to
`xserver-xorg-video-i810,libgl1-mesa-dri'.
> reassign 362946 xserver-xorg-vid
reassign 362944 xserver-xorg-video-i810,libgl1-mesa-dri
reassign 362946 xserver-xorg-video-i810,libgl1-mesa-dri
merge 359328 362944 362946
kthxbye
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 18:33 +0200, Alexander Heinlein wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-core
> Version: 1:1.0.2-4
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi.
>
> Sinc
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: minor
x11-common Conflicts against the package 'XFS-XTT', but this should
be 'xfs-xtt' as all package names are required to be lower case by
policy. I'm not sure if the current package tools enforce this
difference, but its probably best to us
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Painfully, we may have to proceed without freetype support in Xprint
> > after all.
>
> AIUI, the non-freeness issue I raised on xorg-modular, would certainly
> violate
I have determined that the cause of this is the X font directory
changing between Xorg 6 and Xorg 7.
The previous font directories were under /usr/lib/X11/fonts (which is a
symlink to /usr/lib/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts, part of x11-common), whereas in
Xorg 7 they are under /usr/share/fonts/X11. Users wi
Since upgrading to modular x.org icewm isn't loaded after startx
any more. As twm still works fine, I suspect that windows managers
somehow need to be adapted to the new directory layout?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
I'd like to have lintian start helping with notifying packagers of the
X.Org 7 migration. However, I don't want to make matters worse by putting
in a bad check. If someone has a moment, could you look over the
following set of checks and ensure that they're accurate?
(I know more checks are prob
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the package uses imake, it must build-depend on xutils-dev (>=
> 1:1.0.2-1) for the correct paths. If it uses dh_installxfonts to handle X
> font installation, it must build-depend on debhelper (>= 5.0.29).
Ugh, sorry, all of those 1:1.0.2-1 mentio
Hi again.
Sorry for this duplicated bug report. I had weird problems with exim4
telling me that the mail could not be send. You may close or delete this
report.
Alexander Heinlein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:58:03AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Since upgrading to modular x.org icewm isn't loaded after startx
> any more. As twm still works fine, I suspect that windows managers
> somehow need to be adapted to the new directory layout?
No, this is a transient bug in xinit
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:53:10AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'd like to have lintian start helping with notifying packagers of the
> X.Org 7 migration. However, I don't want to make matters worse by putting
> in a bad check. If someone has a moment, could you look over the
> following set of
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Followup-For: Bug #362940
Since last upgrade, I can't start Xorg. I got these messages :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# X
X Window System Version 7.0.0
Release Date: 21 December 2005
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.0
Build Operating System:Linux 2.6.1
I am not sure what the problem was when I first tried VESA but this time when
I tried it is worked well. This is also an improvement on the older XFree86
VESA driver which I never did get to work. So this can be closed as no longer
needed.
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right..
There was another package containing the same libGL.so file. I
uninstalled it, reinstalled xlibmesa-gl, and direct redering is
enabled.. :).
Now glxgears renders around 600 FPS, which is better but still kind of slow.
On the other hand, the display (2D) is really slow. Even switching
Package: libxft2
Version: 2.1.8.2-6
Severity: normal
Note that I have the same problem on two machines and that I do not know
what cause the program to still look at font in
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/c0648bt_.pfb when they are in now in usr/share
make xconfig
scripts/kconfig/qconf arch/i38
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:53:10AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Tag: package-installs-file-to-usr-x11r6-bin
>> Type: error
>> Info: Debian has switched to the modular X tree which now uses the regular
>> FHS paths, and all packages must follow. All pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> reassign 362107 gnome-control-center
Bug#362107: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: evdev crashes gnome-settings-daemon
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-input-evdev' to
`gnome-contro
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: grave
Tags: unstable
Bug #356181/357714 is still alive. I just upgraded to 7.0.12, and
the old/wrong font paths were still there in /etc/X11/xorg.conf. The result of
this is a broken system, with only text consoles available, making
troubleshooting very
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:09:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:05:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > The current xserver-xorg package no longer Provides: the virtual 'xserver'
> > > package, which a
After an upgrade to xorg 1:7.0.12, I was left with one file in
/usr/X11R6/bin: xearth. I subsequently discovered that xearth is
"non-free". Possibly you missed all the non-free package conflicts?
So I removed xearth, and /usr/X11R6/bin went away. X wouldn't start
because nothing could now be f
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-16 17:29:35 -0400 (Sun, 16 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1820
Modified:
trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog
trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/control
Log:
* Provide the virtual 'xserver' package. Thanks Steve Langasek and Daniel
Stone. (closes: #3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 361911 362782
Bug#361911: xbase-clients: Man page links to dir man1x instead of man1
Bug#362782: Broken manpages
Merged 361911 362782.
> -
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 362846 +patch
Bug#362846: /var/lib/dpkg/info/x11-common.postinst: line 918: [: too many
arguments
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> merge 362846 362859
Bug#362846: /var/lib/dpkg/info/x11-common.postinst: line 918: [: too many
arguments
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-16 17:43:48 -0400 (Sun, 16 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1821
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
transition. This prevents the test from succeeding incorrectly.
* Fix case on xfs-xtt conflict for x11-common. Thanks Mi
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-16 17:47:24 -0400 (Sun, 16 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1822
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
* Add x11-common conflict on xearth. Thanks Steve M. Robbins.
(closes: #362524)
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/chan
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:52:52PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:09:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:05:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > The current xserver-xorg pa
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2
Severity: important
Since I upgraded my Toshiba Libretto U105 to use the new xserver-xorg
from unstable, Xorg will shift the graphical display contents by about
25 lines downwards and 768 pixels rightwards, wrapping lines around.
The result is
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 03:59:10PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> After an upgrade to xorg 1:7.0.12, I was left with one file in
> /usr/X11R6/bin: xearth. I subsequently discovered that xearth is
> "non-free". Possibly you missed all the non-free package conflicts?
>
>
> So I removed xearth,
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote:
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-16 17:47:24 -0400 (Sun, 16 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1822
Log:
* Add x11-common conflict on xearth. Thanks Steve M. Robbins.
(closes: #362524)
+Conflicts: [], xearth (>= 1.1-10.2)
Shouldn't thi
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:13:04AM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote:
>
> >Author: dnusinow
> >Date: 2006-04-16 17:47:24 -0400 (Sun, 16 Apr 2006)
> >New Revision: 1822
>
> >Log:
> >* Add x11-common conflict on xearth. Thanks Steve M. R
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-16 18:15:41 -0400 (Sun, 16 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1823
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
Fix brain fart and make xearth conflict <= not >=. Thanks Sven-Haegar Koch
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
=
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:55:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Hi Daniel, hi all!
On Son, 16 Apr 2006, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > - X cannot find the fixed font anymore:
> > The fixed enty in fonts.alias in /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc is not
> > included in the fonts.dir file
[..]
>
> When it gives you that message, it does actually mean it ...
But the font
Hi David,
I appreciate your prompt reply. I imagine you and the rest of the
X11-packaging team must be feeling a bit under fire at the moment.
I'd like to let you know that your efforts are greatly appreciated,
nonetheless.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 05:47:43PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> The x
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:03:15PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I appreciate your prompt reply. I imagine you and the rest of the
> X11-packaging team must be feeling a bit under fire at the moment.
> I'd like to let you know that your efforts are greatly appreciated,
> nonethel
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:55:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
#322946 Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:54:48 +0100
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86
/etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum.
X server symlin
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Followup-For: Bug #362891
Well, I was hoping to diff the xserver.org.postinst between the .10 and
.12 releases.. but dpkg -x doesn't extract these files from my old .10
.deb in my apt cache.
I thought it might help to note I received both a failure on the
p
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Daniele Venzano wrote:
> Package xserver-xorg fails to install on my system with the following
> messages:
> Setting up xserver-xorg (7.0.12) ...
> dpkg: error processing xserver-xorg (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362940 x11-common 1:7.0.11
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default fixed font
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `x11-common'.
> severity 362940 normal
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default fi
reassign 362940 x11-common 1:7.0.11
severity 362940 normal
tags 362940 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.12
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> upgrading to xorg
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: serious
The x11-common preinst script sources /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
unconditionally, but x11-common does not pre-depend on debconf. Since
debconf is not Essential, this is an RC bug.
I suspect that the only use of db_* in x11-common.preinst
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:10:24PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > By the way, the dpkg-reconfigure spit out the following error
> > /var/lib/dpkg/info/x11-common.postinst: line 918: [: too many arguments
> > [this is x11-common 7.0.12]. If this isn't part of the "bug or two"
> > that you are
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362940 serious
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default fixed font
Severity set to `serious'.
> tags 362940 -moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default fixed font
Tags were: unreproduci
package xdm
tags 356858 - experimental
thankyou
(problem still exists in unstable's current version
1:1.0.1-6; suggested patch is still valid)
Regards,
Jan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package xdm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xdm
> tags 356858 - experimental
Bug#356858: xdm chokes on null pointers in address structures returned by
getifaddrs()
Tags were: patch experimental
Tags removed: experimental
> thankyou
Stopping processing
severity 362940 serious
tags 362940 -moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 04:28:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg
> > Version: 1:7.0.12
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: rend
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:18:44PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> It was not from an official package. And it was a symlink, so dealing
> with it is a bit more complicated. Anyhow, I wonder what exactly do we
> win by trying to remove this directory. What is the problem with just
> letting where it i
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Daniele Venzano wrote:
> > Package xserver-xorg fails to install on my system with the following
> > messages:
>
> > Setting up xserver-xorg (7.0.12) ...
> > dpkg: error processing xserver-xorg (--configu
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg
> > Version: 1:7.0.12
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
> > upgrading to xorg-xserver version 7.0.12 broke my system
Package: release-notes
Severity: important
With the release of modular Xorg 7.0 packages, some structural changes
have been made that may hit users during upgrade and thus should be
documented in the Release Notes.
The most important issue is that /usr/X11R6/bin has been dropped and only
remai
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
> This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xorg
> > > Version: 1:7.0.12
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Followup-For: Bug #362891
bash~# dpkg --configure --pending
Setting up xserver-xorg (7.0.12) ...
+ set -e
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
++ '[' '' ']'
++ exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend
/va
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2
Severity: important
Dual head operation on a PCI G450 fails. The first screen is not
initialized properly. The result is an incorrect video signal on the
first port. This likely has to do with mga driver not being able to read
the BIOS fo
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 19:24 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Painfully, we may have to proceed without freetype support in Xprint
> > > after all.
> >
> > AIUI, the non
Hi Michel,
At Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:30:21 +0200,
Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 12:55 +0900, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg
> > Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > This happend twice on my amd64 system with radeon 7200 while using
> > Firefox.
> >
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:15:03AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Daniele Venzano wrote:
> > > Package xserver-xorg fails to install on my system with the following
> > > messages:
> > > Setting up xserve
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:15:03AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > I just ran across this and tried that - it dies right after sourcing the
> > debconf confmodule - debconf's exec line to restart the scripts exit's
> > 64.
>
> Thanks, that's pr
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
