On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:34:09AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> > I'd also like to see the fonts moved to arch any, I got side tracked
> > attempting to switch from .pcf.gz to .ttf format, but there's no reason we
> > can't simply compile to .pcf.gz
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I don't think that Fabio's message was an invitation to complain about X,
> but a request for input on maintaining Debian's X packages in the future.
Of course it was not an invitation to complain but, since 90% of the
people did not even bother to rea
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 04:31:58PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:49:44PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:02:50AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > > Our questions to the community are:
> > >
> > > * What kinds of X packages would you
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:28:22AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Is screen linked with termcap or curses? screen prefers the curses
> > library (though that shouldn't make much difference).
>
> It's linked with the NetBSD curses library (recompiling screen with
> GNU ncurses doesn't make
Package: xfree86
Severity: normal
Tags: patch l10n
Please use the attached updated Danish debconf-po translation (debian/po/da.po)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: L
>> * What kinds of X packages would you like to see in the future?
I hope to realize (upstream) source level separation for each
libraries, X server, drivers, x basic clients, fonts, misc data
and so on.
To maintain monolithic, large source tree (likes current xfree86
package) is too hard.
>>
Subject: Alt-Tab switching broken in dfsg.1-5
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Hi,
when upgrading x from dfsg.1-4 to -5, the handy Alt-Tab "Task switching" ceases
to function on a KDE machine as well as on a Gnome/metacity machine. One has
r128, the other has a
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set t
* Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 10:34]:
> > * Should we regard X.Org or FreeDesktop.Org as our upstream source?
>
> I'd like to consider X.Org as upstream for libraries and headers; however,
> I'd also like to wait until X.Org has managed to switch to a modular build
> system so th
Apologize for the messy bug report (not even capable of using reportbug
correctly!! :'( )
The exact problem come from /usr/bin/uxterm during the locale checking:
case $value in
*.utf8|*.UTF8|*.utf-8|*.UTF-8)
found=yes
;;
this does not include "@euro
* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 09:02]:
> * Should we regard X.Org or FreeDesktop.Org as our upstream source?
Yes, I'd go with one of them. Keith Packard is also in the NM queue
and interested in helping out.
> * Should we go our own way starting from the "sanitized" XFr
The uxterm script detect "*.[utf|UTF]-8"... and not
"*.[utf|[EMAIL PROTECTED]". So applications say "locale not supported"
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:30:14PM +0200, Matthieu Lagouge wrote:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
> Severity: normal
> T
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:15:26PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 10:34]:
> > > * Should we regard X.Org or FreeDesktop.Org as our upstream source?
> >
> > I'd like to consider X.Org as upstream for libraries and headers; however,
> > I'd also like
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:02:50AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> As you might have seen from the messages on debian-devel-changes,
> 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 has been accepted into unstable.
>
> As XSF release manager, I have no objections to the TODO list for -6 [0],
> but there is one ite
Le sam 19/06/2004 à 16:13, Thomas Dickey a écrit :
> The uxterm script detect "*.[utf|UTF]-8"... and not
> "*.[utf|[EMAIL PROTECTED]". So applications say "locale not supported"
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:30:14PM +0200, Matthieu Lagouge wrote:
>
Package: xlibs-data
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
It has been fixed in official XFree86, see
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1362
for more detail.
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Arc
Branden,
Please find attached my revision 1373 /var/log/XFree86.0.log.
Same problem :-(
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 05:22:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[snip]
> > > You appear to have a motherboard that the PCI bus handling code in
> > > XFree86 4.3.0 doesn't deal with well; a lot of "ph
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 05:53:02PM +0200, Matthieu Lagouge wrote:
> Le sam 19/06/2004 ? 16:13, Thomas Dickey a ?crit :
> > The uxterm script detect "*.[utf|UTF]-8"... and not
> > "*.[utf|[EMAIL PROTECTED]". So applications say "locale not supported"
> > Reply-To:
> > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Around 14 o'clock on Jun 19, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I thought X.Org was the monolithic while FreeDesktop.Org the modular
> release. Since you mention X.Org and the monolithic release, I guess
> this is not correct. Can you explain the difference between X.Org and
> FreeDesktop.Org?
The curr
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:28:20AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Many other people have joined in to help efforts in this tree. A few
> have started exploring how to build the XFree86-based modular driver
> architecture within the X server, including replacing the custom ELF/COFF
> loader with dl
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-19 16:59:19 -0500 (Sat, 19 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1554
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/po/da.po
Log:
Update Danish debconf template translations (thanks, Claus Hindsgaul).
(Closes: #255184)
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANG
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I've ported libglide3 to amd64 and ia64. So now xfree86 can Build-Depend
on libglide3-dev on those arches.
Attached the patch (against branches/4.3.0/sid) that enables those.
regards,
guillem
Index: debian/control
=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 1553:1554 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 255184 + pending
Bug#255184: xfree86: Updat
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: normal
I'm working on Mesa, specificaly getting DRI to work on this mach64. I have
an i386 box with a simular chip and it workes well.
I don't think that has anything todo with DRI, I think it's only for
glx(remote/indirect) clients.
(I
I should note that I'm seeing this behavior under openbox & -5 as well.
I hadn't made the correlation between the new version of X and the
problem, I originally thought it was just an openbox problem. It seems
that Alt-tab works fine when only pressing it once, but holding down Alt
and pressing
25 matches
Mail list logo
