Processed: reassign 234772 to xfree86, merging 233645 234772

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 234772 xfree86 Bug#234772: problems linking with libICE Bug reassigned from package `libice-dev' to `xfree86'. > merge 233645 234772 Bug#233645: xfree86: [shell-lib.sh] de

Bug#234496: xserver-xfree86: xserver freeze all input devices randomely

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi Branden, Am Mo den 1. Mär 2004 um 4:21 schriebst Du: > Well, could you comment out all the Wacom devices from your ServerLayout > for a while and see if you can reproduce the problem without the wacom > driver in use? Hmm... Yes, I can try this. But it wil

Processed: tagging 233621

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 233621 - moreinfo Bug#233621: xlibs: numeric keypad period key doesn't work on Brazilian ABNT2 keyboards Tags were: pending moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo > End of message,

Bug#234903: xfree86: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation

On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 06:12:59PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > No, your file is a mixture of UTF-8 and ISO-8859-1 (for unbreakable > > spaces) encoded characters. Please check your changes against the > > version stored in the svn repository,

Bug#42057: xlibs: [xkb] data for French keyboards should use info in the French-HOWTO

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:28:04AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Guérard wrote: [...] > I had no news since then. I am rather skeptical that he will consider my > patch this time, as it seems he completely ignored my previous patch. > > If you suggest that I submit this to Guylhem Aznar, it's just a waste

Processing of xfree86_4.3.0-3_i386.changes

xfree86_4.3.0-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xfree86_4.3.0-3.dsc xfree86_4.3.0-3.diff.gz lbxproxy_4.3.0-3_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0-3_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-3_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0-3_i386.deb libice6_4.3.0-3_i386.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0-3_

Accepted xfree86 4.3.0-3 (i386 source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:07:25 -0500 Source: xfree86 Binary: libx11-6-dbg libxtst6-dbg xserver-common xlibs-static-dev libxp6-dbg xbase-clients xlibmesa3-dbg libxtrap6-dbg xfonts-75dpi libxt6 libice6-dbg xmh libxaw6-dbg x-dev libxv1 libx

xfree86_4.3.0-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lbxproxy_4.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-3_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-3_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-3_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree

xfree86 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): xlibs-dbg_4.3.0-3_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says libdevel. xlibs-dev_4.3.0-3_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says libdevel. xlibs-dev_4.3.0-3_a

Re: Is there really nobody that can help me? (was Re: radeon 9200, Linux 2.6 and Xfree 4.3.0 dri not working)

LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo name of display: :0.0 libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 4.0.1 r200 (screen 0) libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so libGL error: dlopen /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so failed (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so: undefined symbol: s

Bug#234049: marked as done (xfree86: Please update Japanese debconf translation)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#234049: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233621: marked as done (xlibs: numeric keypad period key doesn't work on Brazilian ABNT2 keyboards)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#233621: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233780: marked as done (xlibmesa-dri: DRI-based hardware 3D acceleration broken due to missing sse_test_dummy symbol)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229984: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233582: marked as done (xlibmesa-dri: DRI-based hardware 3D acceleration broken due to missing sse_test_dummy symbol)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229984: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233674: marked as done (xdm: missing line-continuation character in config script)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#233674: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#215793: marked as done (xfree86: make debian/rules binary idempotent)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:43 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#215793: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#229984: marked as done (xlibmesa-dri: DRI-based hardware 3D acceleration broken due to missing sse_test_dummy symbol)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229984: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233670: marked as done (xlibmesa-dri: DRI-based hardware 3D acceleration broken due to missing sse_test_dummy symbol)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229984: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233743: marked as done (xlibmesa-dri: DRI-based hardware 3D acceleration broken due to missing sse_test_dummy symbol)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229984: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#234444: marked as done (xlibmesa-dri: DRI-based hardware 3D acceleration broken due to missing sse_test_dummy symbol)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229984: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#234532: marked as done (xlibmesa-dri: DRI-based hardware 3D acceleration broken due to missing sse_test_dummy symbol)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229984: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#235281: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: ati rage 128: opengl applications are slow)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229984: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233645: marked as done (xfree86: [shell-lib.sh] deregister_x_lib_dir_with_ld_so() calls fgrep with no second arg, causing maintainer scripts to hang forever trying to read from STDIN)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#233645: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#234772: marked as done (problems linking with libICE)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#233645: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233734: marked as done (xlibs: Belgian keymap incorrect; cannot produce backslash symbol)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#233734: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233948: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [freetype] underlining doesn't work with TrueType fonts)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#233948: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#234060: marked as done (xfree86: Updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:47:44 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#234060: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#233699: xserver-xfree86: < and > don't work with french keyboard

Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-2 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #233699 < and > don't work with fr keyboard (azerty) since dist-upgrade (update to XFree86 4.3.0). To avoid this problem, i have put this row in my $HOME/.Xmodmap : keycode 94 = less greater bar brokenbar bar brokenbar

Re: person needed to build and test XFree86 trunk for 4.3.0-3 release

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:16:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 07:52:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:20:20PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:33:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > A couple of days ago, James Tr

Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution

On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:43:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > XFree86 refuses to use DRI at resolutions higher than 1024x768 on a > > 3dfx Voodoo Banshee and complains with this message on the logs: > > > > (WW) TDFX(0): [dri] To use DRI, with a 16Mb Voodoo 3 or Banshee card, > > y

Re: Question on X and new license...

Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:57:04PM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: >> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > There may not be very many people who want to use the new XFree86 >> > license, just to get along with the XFree86 Project leadership, and

Re: Bug#224909: kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released

reassign 224909 xserver-xfree86 quit On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:01:01AM +0100, Bruno Muller wrote: > Le sam 28/02/2004 ? 11:11, Herbert Xu a ?crit : > > > > Can you still reproduce this with 2.6.2? > > > > > > If so please show me the full kernel boot messages. > > > > Please reply. > > Sorry.

Processed: Re: Bug#224909: kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 224909 xserver-xfree86 Bug#224909: kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `xserver-xfree86'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#235241: With Intel 845G using i810: After upgrade 4.2.1-->4.3.0, CTRL-ALT-F1 stopped switching to VT1. Does nothing.

On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 18:49, Oliver Johns wrote: > > No, that does not change anything. The relevant section of > XF86Config-4 now reads: > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Generic Keyboard" > Driver "keyboard" > Option "CoreKeyboard"

unsubscribe

IPLNet WebMail http://www.mail.ipl.pt "Campus Virtual" do IPL - Já Aceite ! http://www.net.ipl.pt/index.html#WIRELESS

Bug#235241: With Intel 845G using i810: After upgrade 4.2.1-->4.3.0, CTRL-ALT-F1 stopped switching to VT1. Does nothing.

On 01.03.2004 13:07 Michel Dänzer wrote: On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 18:49, Oliver Johns wrote: > > No, that does not change anything. The relevant section of > XF86Config-4 now reads: > Section "InputDevice" >Identifier "Generic Keyboard" >Driver "keyboard" >

Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 10:55, Chris Ruvolo wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:43:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > It looks to me like the error message you're complaining of was not > > added in 4.3.0. > > I don't see anything that is obviously causing this to be triggered. > However, I

Re: Still can't get dri to work with Radeon 9200

On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 12:07, Alan Chandler wrote: > > kanger:/home/alan# lsmod | grep agp > sis_agp 5760 1 > agpgart32168 1 sis_agp > > And syslog now has the following > > Feb 29 10:58:10 kanger kernel: agpgart: Detected SiS 735 chipset > Feb 29 10:58:10 kange

FYI: Builds of 4.3.0-3 failed because of tetex bug.

Hello, Just FYI: Afaict the builds of 4.3.0-3 (only tried on alpha and powerpc) failed because of #235401 (yes, it is rc) against tetex-bin. - Not your fault. | Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-8) ... [...] | Running initex. This may take some time. ... | Error: `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=late

Bug#234788: Major data loss because of .xsession-errors

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 05:23:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote: > > When I tried it as root, X worked, but the /dev/null became 0600. > > So it seems it wants to chmod 0600 .xsession-errors. > > That would probably be a security hole (at least a DOS: make ld.so 600 > and th

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1117 - tags

Author: branden Date: 2004-03-01 10:28:29 -0500 (Mon, 01 Mar 2004) New Revision: 1117 Added: tags/4.3.0-3/ Log: Tag 4.3.0-3 release. Copied: tags/4.3.0-3 (from rev 1115, trunk)

Re: person needed to build and test XFree86 trunk for 4.3.0-3 release

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:36:33PM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:33:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > Please build in a clean sid chroot, and mail the debian-x list when the > > packages are ready. > > I have just started the build. We'll see what happens. Cheers!

Re: who is the author of the Linux evdev patch to lnx_kbd.c?

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 10:34:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:19:07PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > > I should have put a note on it when I wrote it. > > You did put a copyright notice in one file, but there was no license > information, so that was needed. Al

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1118 - in trunk/debian: . po

Author: branden Date: 2004-03-01 10:35:59 -0500 (Mon, 01 Mar 2004) New Revision: 1118 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/po/fr.po Log: Fix missing non-breaking spaces (thanks, Christian Perrier). Modified: trunk/debian/changelog ==

thanks, Denis Barbier!

Hi Denis, I just wanted to say that your work on going through old XKB bugs is noticed and *very* much appreciated. I'd been meaning to do so with every new upstream release for years now, but never managed to do it. Some new crisis always intervened, and combined with my ignorance of European ke

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1119 - in trunk/debian: . local

Author: branden Date: 2004-03-01 10:40:14 -0500 (Mon, 01 Mar 2004) New Revision: 1119 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/local/Xsession Log: Stop attempting to chmod X session error file if it is a symbolic link (see #234788). Modified: trunk/debian/changelog ===

Bug#173565: xterm #173565

On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 10:45:49AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > I didn't comment on this before, but his patch would not have been sufficient > since KOI8-R uses codes in the range 128-159. But I added the -k8 option > last year to address this, so it is possible to make it work. Recently > (tes

Bug#19537: marked as done (xterm: text selection in alternate screen buffer grabs white space after end of line)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:42:34 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#19537: xterm bug #19537 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Processed: Re: Bug#222530: xterm bug #222530

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 222530 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug#222530: xterm: crash after clicking with the right button There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream > retitle 222530 xterm: crash after clicking with the right button [fixed in > XFree86 CVS

Processed: retitle 235482 to xserver-xfree86: [mga] DRM cannot allocate IRQ on MGA G550 AGP rev 1 [regression from 4.2.1] ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 235482 xserver-xfree86: [mga] DRM cannot allocate IRQ on MGA G550 AGP > rev 1 [regression from 4.2.1] Bug#235482: mga: drm cannot allocate irq in XFree86 4.3.0 Changed Bug

Bug#86835: marked as done (xterm: want configurable highlight and pointer colors)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:48:15 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#86835: xterm bug #86835 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Re: who is the author of the Linux evdev patch to lnx_kbd.c?

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:57:22AM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 10:34:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Does that look all right? > > It looks perfect. Excellent. > As a side note, what is the best way of extracting these patches from > SVN so I can put the cur

Bug#235652: xbase-clients: key remaped with xmodmap fails to respond as expected to shifting

Package: xbase-clients Version: 4.3.0-2 Severity: normal When remapping the "\|" key to the "Backspace" key and vice versa on a standard US 104 keyboard using: xmodmap -e 'keycode 22 = backslash bar' xmodmap -e 'keycode 51 = BackSpace' Pressing "backspace" generates "\" when pressed as expected

Bug#235657: DRI programs change gamma value

Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-2.woody.1 Severity: important The Problem: When I start any program which makes use of hardware 3D acceleration like glxinfo, the gamma value of the hole screen is getting lighter. So every time 3D acceleration was used I have to open a xterm to start 'xgamm

Re: Still can't get dri to work with Radeon 9200

On Monday 01 March 2004 13:09, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 12:07, Alan Chandler wrote: > > kanger:/home/alan# lsmod | grep agp > > sis_agp 5760 1 > > agpgart32168 1 sis_agp > > > > And syslog now has the following > > > > Feb 29 10:58:10 kanger ker

Re: person needed to build and test XFree86 trunk for 4.3.0-3 release

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:49:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Mmm, it seems someone already uploaded 4.3.0-3. So is my build actually > still needed ? No, but thank you for pitching in to help! -- G. Branden Robinson|If you wish to strive for peace of Debian GNU/Linux

Bug#235652: xbase-clients: key remaped with xmodmap fails to respond as expected to shifting

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:55:25PM -0500, Dave Harding wrote: > Package: xbase-clients > Version: 4.3.0-2 > Severity: normal > > When remapping the "\|" key to the "Backspace" key and vice versa on a > standard US 104 keyboard using: > > xmodmap -e 'keycode 22 = backslash bar' > xmodmap -e 'keyc

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 224909 minor Bug#224909: kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released Severity set to `minor'. > merge 224909 230636 Bug#224909: kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released Bug#230636: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't access hardware directly

Bug#235671: signal 11 with intel 865G

Package: xserver-xfree86-dbg Version: 4.3.0-2 Severity: normal I have an IBM ThinkCentre desktop with the Intel 865G graphics chipset, which is supposedly supported by XFree v. 4.3.0 or later. However, when I run 'startx' (for an 18" T860 LCD display with the manufacturer-recommended refresh/sync

Bug#233699: xserver-xfree86: < and > don't work with french keyboard

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:50:15AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Version: 4.3.0-2 > Severity: normal > Followup-For: Bug #233699 > > < and > don't work with fr keyboard (azerty) since dist-upgrade (update > to XFree86 4.3.0). > > To avoid this problem, i have put

Re: Question on X and new license...

Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (Fellow debian-x subscribers: I'd like your feedback on this message, as > once debian-legal has made its decision regarding the DFSG-freeness of > the X-Oz license, I'd like to re-purpose it, perhaps as a mail to > debian-devel-announce and/or as a p

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1120 - in trunk/debian: . patches

Author: branden Date: 2004-03-01 15:52:33 -0500 (Mon, 01 Mar 2004) New Revision: 1120 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff Log: Grab from upstream CVS HEAD several updates to the en_US.UTF-8 Compose file. Modified: trunk/debian/changelog =

Bug#85588: marked as done (xlibs: [XKB] danish symbols file has AltGr+space produce a non-breaking space, which is annoying)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 21:38:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xlibs: [XKB] danish symbols file has AltGr+space produce a non-breaking space, which is annoying has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Processed: reassign 224909 to xlibs, merging 224909 230204

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 224909 xlibs Bug#224909: kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released Bug#230636: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't access hardware directly. Bug reassigned from pack

Bug#115837: marked as done (xlibs and locale again)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 21:45:17 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xlibs and locale again has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#234788: Major data loss because of .xsession-errors

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:27:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 05:23:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote: > > > When I tried it as root, X worked, but the /dev/null became 0600. > > > So it seems it wants to chmod 0600 .xsession-errors. > > > > T

Bug#235671: signal 11 with intel 865G

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 21:51, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86-dbg > Version: 4.3.0-2 > Severity: normal > > I have an IBM ThinkCentre desktop with the Intel 865G graphics chipset, > which is supposedly supported by XFree v. 4.3.0 or later. However, when > I run 'startx' (for an

Processed: severity of 224909 is normal, merging 224909 230204

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 224909 normal Bug#224909: kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released Bug#230636: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't access hardware directly. Severity set to `normal

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 235671 xserver-xfree86 Bug#235671: signal 11 with intel 865G Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86-dbg' to `xserver-xfree86'. > severity 235671 important Bug#235671: signal 11 with intel 865G Severity set to `important'. > merge 235671

Bug#228898: MTRR problem seen on a Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo D

FWIW, I have seen the error message "mtrr: no more MTRR's available" on my mother's laptop, showing up in dmesg more than a hundred times. This system is not online and accessible to me now, so I can't check the details, but it is a Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo D, a fairly early version, I think it h

Bug#235671: signal 11 with intel 865G

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Christian Guggenberger wrote: > known issue, see Bug #226430. > Branden currently reviews some patches, which maybe will be included in > 4.3.0-4, to fix this issue. > In the meantime, you could upgrade to packages available at > http://rphlx1.uni-r.de > to fix your problem. Th

Bug#235671: [Fwd: Re: Bug#235671: signal 11 with intel 865G]

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Christian Guggenberger wrote: > > > In the meantime, you could upgrade to packages available at > > > http://rphlx1.uni-r.de > > > to fix your problem. > > > > Thanks. I tried the packages in http://rphlx1.uni-r.de/woody and > > http://rphlx1.uni-r.de/sid, and get the same erro

Bug#235687: new versions of libx11-6 and libxt6 will not install (4.3.0-3)

Package: libx11-6, libxt6 Version: 4.3.0-3 Both packages will not install which causes ALL of the new X11 packages to not install. Here is the error messages: Preparing to replace libx11-6 4.3.0-2 (using .../libx11-6_4.3.0-3_i386.deb) ... /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 611: Syntax error: end of fi

Bug#235687: more info for syntax error in X package install scripts

This hit me too. It is because of either a bash-ism in the install script, or a deficiency in dash (the shell currently acting as /bin/sh). The work around, then, is to replace /bin/sh with a link to bash and try the install again. If dash has installed itself as /bin/sh, this is

Bug#235687: new versions of libx11-6 and libxt6 will not install (4.3.0-3)

Whoa ! That was it ! /bin/sh was linked to dash. I wonder how long that had existed here. I just purged the packages "dash" and "ash" from this system which were not needed and caused this problem. These packages and all of the new X11 4.3.0-3 packages are now installed on this system. On Mon,

Re: Question on X and new license...

Dominique Dumont wrote: > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> (Fellow debian-x subscribers: I'd like your feedback on this message, as >> once debian-legal has made its decision regarding the DFSG-freeness of >> the X-Oz license, I'd like to re-purpose it, perhaps as a mail to >> de

Bug#235699: xlibs: upstream default is no more pc104, but pc105

Package: xlibs Version: 4.3.0-2 Severity: minor In /etc/X11/xkb/keymap/xfree86: default xkb_keymap "us" { xkb_keycodes{ include "xfree86" }; xkb_types { include "default" }; xkb_compatibility { include "default" }; x

Bug#235701: xlibs-dev: circular dependency back to itself

Package: xlibs-dev Version: 4.3.0-3 Hello, the xlibs-dev package comment states it to be a transitional package, but I cannot remove it, because it circular depends back on itself: xlibs-dev depends on libxrandr-dev libxrandr-dev depends on libxrender-dev libxrender-dev depends on xlibs-dev I c

Bug#235704: MonitorLayout detection fails with VGA + S-Video out on Radeon 7000 / QY

Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-3 I have a Radeon 7000 / QY (rv100) with both VGA and S-Video outputs. I have my CRT monitor connected to the VGA out. There is nothing connected to the S-Video out. The radeon driver claims to detect two monitors, but fails to fetch the VertSync and

Bug#235702: upgrade to 4.3.0-3 fails in xfree86-common.config

Package: xfree86-common Version: 4.3.0-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have /bin/sh -> /bin/dash. (-> /bin/bash does not exhibit this problem.) condor:~/django/doupe_lab/data_viewer$ sudo apt-get install xfree86-common Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency

Bug#235705: xfree86-common.config dies with dash == /bin/sh

Package: xfree86-common Version: 4.3.0-3 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable David Schleef pointed this one out to me this afternoon. With dash as /bin/sh, xfree86-common.config can't be processed. The attached patch fixes it - basically, dash wants 'EOF' on its own

Bug#235702: Oops...

merge 235705 235702 thanks Oops, David Schleef started filing a bug at the same time that I did. Merged. -- Joshua Kwan signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Oops...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 235705 235702 Bug#235702: upgrade to 4.3.0-3 fails in xfree86-common.config Bug#235705: xfree86-common.config dies with dash == /bin/sh Merged 235702 235705. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bu

Bug#234025: ATI screen turns milky when using TV-out

I suspect that this bug report refers to change number 268, aka Bugzilla #351, and corrected in revision 1.28 of the Radeon driver, as found at: . Fix Radeon register initialization for RGB offset to fix

Processed: More of dash

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 235687 grave Bug#235687: new versions of libx11-6 and libxt6 will not install (4.3.0-3) Severity set to `grave'. > merge 235702 235687 Bug#235687: new versions of libx11-6 and libxt6 will not install (4.3.0-3) Bug#235702: upgrade to 4.3.0-3 fa

Processed: merging, take 2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 235687 xfree86-common Bug#235687: new versions of libx11-6 and libxt6 will not install (4.3.0-3) Bug reassigned from package `libx11-6, libxt6' to `xfree86-common'. > merge 235702 235687 Bug#235687: new versions of libx11-6 and libxt6 will not

Processed: severity of 235702 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 235702 important Bug#235702: upgrade to 4.3.0-3 fails in xfree86-common.config Bug#235687: new versions of libx11-6 and libxt6 will not install (4.3.0-3) Bug#235705: xfree86-common.config dies with dash == /bin/sh Severity set to `important'.

Re: Question on X and new license...

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 17:49, Warren Turkal wrote: > Dominique Dumont wrote: > > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> (Fellow debian-x subscribers: I'd like your feedback on this message, as > >> once debian-legal has made its decision regarding the DFSG-freeness of > >> the X-O

Processed: severity of 235705 is important ..., reassign 235705 to xfree86, reassign 235687 to xfree86 ... ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 235705 important Bug#235705: xfree86-common.config dies with dash == /bin/sh Bug#235687: new versions of libx11-6 and libxt6 will not install (4.3.0-3) Bug#235702: upgrade

build of revision 1115 for i386

Hello! My build of xfree86 4.3.0-3 for i386 is available, built in a pbuilder chroot, at: deb http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/xfree86 ./ The changes are signed with my key, RSA/78446F26. Enjoy.. -- Joshua Kwan signature.asc Description: Digital signature