Bug#225408: Another hitch

2003-12-30 Thread David Schmitt
After removing the spurious ), another minor problem popped up. The next line should be changed to mirror its counterpart in the build target: --- debian/rules.orig 2003-12-30 10:21:13.0 +0100 +++ debian/rules2003-12-30 10:20:53.0 +0100 @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@

Processed: Re: Bug#103008: konqueror: Konqueror java applet embedding vs. window managers

2003-12-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Riku Voipio writes: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > package konqueror Ignoring bugs not assigned to: konqueror > tags 103008 -wontfix Bug#103008: Java applets are showed in diferent windows in Wmaker (using kwin works well) Tags

Bug#103008: konqueror: Konqueror java applet embedding vs. window managers

2003-12-30 Thread Dominique Devriese
Riku Voipio writes: package konqueror tags 103008 -wontfix clone 103008 -1 -2 retitle 103008 twm: twm should support the XEmbed spec retitle -1 wmaker: wmaker should support the XEmbed spec retitle -2 xfwm4: xfwm4 should support the XEmbed spec reassign 103008 twm reassign -1 wmaker reassign -2 xf

Bug#225520: Diff of NMU 1.0.2-3.1

2003-12-30 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Package: xcursor Severity: normal Tags: patch -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux zensunni 2.4.23-evms1.2.1 #1 SMP Sun Nov 30 16:56:51 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 -- Obsig: developing a new sig diff -r -u xcursor-1.0.

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xcursor 1.0.2-3.1

2003-12-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 225433 + fixed Bug#225433: xcursor: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on pkg-config again There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#225526: xserver-xfree86: [pciprobe] Newer 2.6 kernels on sparc have changed some file names.

2003-12-30 Thread Mike Mestnik) (The Archmage Forever
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-13 Severity: normal This other bug describes the changes made in 2.6: #225521 I can't seam to force X to work, nor can I change the proc fs. There dose not seam to be a workaround :( -- Package-specific info: # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 X server configuration

X Strike Force Xcursor SVN commit: rev 35 - trunk/debian

2003-12-30 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-12-30 11:47:06 -0500 (Tue, 30 Dec 2003) New Revision: 35 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog Log: Set release urgency to "medium". Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2003-

X Strike Force Xcursor SVN commit: rev 34 - trunk/debian

2003-12-30 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-12-30 11:46:08 -0500 (Tue, 30 Dec 2003) New Revision: 34 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/control Log: Restore build-dependency on pkg-config; AM_MAINTAINER_MODE doesn't prevent the ./configure script from running during a package build, and the ./conf

Bug#225435: xserver-xfree86: Incorrectly detected DPI info

2003-12-30 Thread Jerome L Quinn
What version is display size detection available? In that case, this bug should be a wishlist to document that the radeon driver doesn't currently support display size detection - or backport detection to whichever version of the X server that ends up in sarge. Jerry |-+--

X Strike Force Xcursor SVN commit: rev 36 - trunk/debian

2003-12-30 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-12-30 11:48:39 -0500 (Tue, 30 Dec 2003) New Revision: 36 Modified: trunk/debian/control Log: (cosmetic) Remove extraneous space from libxcursor-dev's short description. Ray Dassen says this is a lintian warning, but my copy of lintian (version 1.22.9) doesn't complain

Re: xfree planned for sarge

2003-12-30 Thread Fabrice Lorrain (home)
Hi all, No answer after 3 days, let's reword it. To my knowledge, the following Intel chipsets (830M/845G/852GM/855GM/865G) are unsupported in Xfree86-4.2.1 hence unsupported in the current sid packages. They are supported in Xfree-4.3 (cf. [1] or [2] ). From [1] "Does XFree86 4.2.0 or 4.2.1

xcursor_1.0.2-4_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2003-12-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xcursor/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-4_powerpc.deb libxcursor1-dbg_1.0.2-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xcursor/libxcursor1-dbg_1.0.2-4_powerpc.deb libxcursor1_1.0.2-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xcursor/libxcursor1_1.0.2-4_powerpc.deb xcursor

Processing of xcursor_1.0.2-4_powerpc.changes

2003-12-30 Thread Archive Administrator
xcursor_1.0.2-4_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xcursor_1.0.2-4.dsc xcursor_1.0.2-4.diff.gz libxcursor1_1.0.2-4_powerpc.deb libxcursor1-dbg_1.0.2-4_powerpc.deb libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-4_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#225433: marked as done (xcursor: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on pkg-config again)

2003-12-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:50:20 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225433: fixed in xcursor 1.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

X Strike Force Xcursor SVN commit: rev 37 - tags

2003-12-30 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-12-30 14:34:09 -0500 (Tue, 30 Dec 2003) New Revision: 37 Added: tags/1.0.2-4/ Log: Tag 1.0.2-4 release. Copied: tags/1.0.2-4 (from rev 36, trunk)

Bug#225526: xserver-xfree86: [pciprobe] Newer 2.6 kernels on sparc, patch in CVS

2003-12-30 Thread Mike Mestnik
I was doing a web search and I got pointed to xfree86 CVS. http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/r128_driver.c Revision 1.58 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Fri Jan 25 21:55:56 2002 UTC (23 months ago) by tsi Branch: MAIN CVS Tags: dri-20020222-

xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.changes REJECTED

2003-12-30 Thread Debian Installer
=== If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

Bug#225450: (xrender: incomplete sentence in changelog) error details

2003-12-30 Thread Ross Boylan
Here are some of the errors I referred to in my original report: /bin/sh ../../../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -O

Re: xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.changes REJECTED

2003-12-30 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:08:41PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote: > [nothing of substance, annoyingly] Hi all, OK, so here's what happened: * Branden builds pre1v5 (source all powerpc), uploads and has it held in queue/new. * I build pre1v5 (i386) in my sid chroot, upload and have it held

Bug#225176: xserver-xfree86: 3D Rage Pro 215GP (rev 5c) (on Sun Ultra5) Black Screen.

2003-12-30 Thread Mike Mestnik
I did some poking around and I found some mail arcives that claim... 1. Only 1286x1024 is supported. Dosen't say what depth, but it must be <8,15,16,!(24|32) on a 4MB card. 2. You must "setenv monitor H" in the bios, didn't exist on my sparc. You would think that with all X dose to validate vide

cpp -traditional bug believed fixed in gcc-3.3 version 1:2.2.2ds1-0pre1

2003-12-30 Thread Nathanael Nerode
A version of gcc-3.3 with my bug fix for the /**/# bug affecting X Windows appears to be in 'unstable' as of today. :-) I suppose that this means for the next X upload you can replace X's dependency on cpp-3.2 with something else (I can't quite figure out what -- perhaps a conflict against cp

Bug#211765: Non-free Xfree86 stuff looks like it's all for OpenGL

2003-12-30 Thread Nathanael Nerode
This appears to be all for OpenGL support, right? It would be sad to lose OpenGL support in the X Server in 'main', but it wouldn't be catastrophic. Do we know who the copyright holders for all of these are, so that they can be contacted? Are they all SGI copyright (as it appears at first g

Re: xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5_i386.changes REJECTED

2003-12-30 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:34:26AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:08:41PM -0500, Debian Installer wrote: > > [nothing of substance, annoyingly] > > Hi all, > OK, so here's what happened: > * Branden builds pre1v5 (source all powerpc), uploads and has it held > in que

[PATCH 4.3.0] Xrender and Xft incorrect symlink in debian/rules

2003-12-30 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5 fail to build on alpha with this error, perhaps it is architecture independent problem. + gcc -o ./libXft.so.1.1~ -shared -Wl,-soname,libXft.so.1 xftcfg.o xftcolor.o xftcore.o xftdbg.o xftdpy.o xftdraw.o xftextent.o xftfont.o xftfs.o xftinit.o xftlist.o xftmatch.o xftmatr