X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 750 - people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian

2003-11-04 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-11-04 00:44:03 -0500 (Tue, 04 Nov 2003) New Revision: 750 Modified: people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian/changelog people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian/control Log: Rewrite xlibs's short description. - debian/control Modified: peopl

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 751 - people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian

2003-11-04 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-11-04 01:09:47 -0500 (Tue, 04 Nov 2003) New Revision: 751 Modified: people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian/control Log: (cosmetic) Clarify libsm6's short description: the X session management protocol is not an extension to the X protocol. - debian/contr

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 752 - people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian

2003-11-04 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-11-04 01:13:08 -0500 (Tue, 04 Nov 2003) New Revision: 752 Modified: people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian/control Log: (cosmetic) Actually give libxext6 a short description. - debian/control Modified: people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debia

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > Why should the DDK be restricted to only some architectures? > > > > Because the SDK is 170Mo

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 753 - people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian

2003-11-04 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2003-11-04 02:03:36 -0500 (Tue, 04 Nov 2003) New Revision: 753 Added: people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian/libice6-dbg.install people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian/libice6-dbg.links people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian/lib

Bug#202096: xfs: plan for running as non-root user and better FPE handling

2003-11-04 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, Branden and I were talking the other day on IRC to get a consensus on some issue from this mini-plan. Ishikawa, I'll like specially if you could comment on this, if you don't like something we can keep discussing. username = xfontserver || xfntserv homedir = /var/run/$USERNAME logdir =

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:40, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I like to test my packages before uploa

New X fonts bug workaround?

2003-11-04 Thread Mike Schiraldi
Sorry for the spam, but i was wondering anyone has a workaround for bug 213286 / 214449 (X apps unable to find even the most basic fonts). It renders my system almost unusable. Is there anything i can do, even if it's short-term and hacky, to get emacs et al working again? An strace of xterm cras

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 753 - people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian

2003-11-04 Thread James Troup
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Split xlibs-dbg package into one package per shared library. What's the rationale behind this? I understand the rationale for -dev and lib packages but not -dbg. AFAICS soname bumps don't affect -dbg packages and any split to a s

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:40, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500,

Bug#216933: update; log

2003-11-04 Thread Joey Hess
I'm not sure why this bug is tagged moreinfo; I have responded to all requests for information. Since I reported the bug, I have begun keeping a log of each occurance, to try to work out what triggers it. I cannot see a pattern though. Here is my current log: 26 Oct fail: 5:10 pm action: had jus

Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-04 Thread Michel Dänzer
[ I followed up to the OpenGL related problem to bug #218823 ] On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 18:42, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:40, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrot

Re: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re: Driver SDK.)

2003-11-04 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:19:15AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Eh? I mean a single package for all drivers (of which the admin can > choose between last-released, current-cvs, ... flavours), in case that > wasn't clear. I don't really see that this buys us much advantage over the status quo. --

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 753 - people/branden/xlibs-and-xbase-clients-split/debian

2003-11-04 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:57:32PM +, James Troup wrote: > X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Split xlibs-dbg package into one package per shared library. > > What's the rationale behind this? I understand the rationale for -dev > and lib packages but not -

Bug#219039: Comments

2003-11-04 Thread Osvaldo Santana Neto
I try start xinit. XServer aparently works. The problem ocur only when i start with startx (i'm using gnome-2.4). Maybe the problem is in gnome? -- Osvaldo Santana Neto - aCiDBaSe [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ: 11287184 http://www.osantanabr.brturbo.com

Bug#219039: Sorry, this is a Brown Paper Bag Bug...

2003-11-04 Thread Osvaldo Santana Neto
Sorry, I've found the problem: My ~/.ICE* file permissions is read-only :/ -- Osvaldo Santana Neto - aCiDBaSe [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ: 11287184 http://www.osantanabr.brturbo.com

Bug#216933: update; log

2003-11-04 Thread Branden Robinson
tag 216933 - moreinfo tag 216933 + help thanks On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:35:39PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > I'm not sure why this bug is tagged moreinfo; I have responded to all > requests for information. Sorry, it's only tagged that way because I forgot to untag it. -- G. Branden Robinson

Processed: Re: Bug#216933: update; log

2003-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 216933 - moreinfo Bug#216933: xlibs: many clients get BadLength error from X_ChangeProperty request Tags were: moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo > tag 216933 + help Bug#216933: xlibs: many clients get BadLength error from X_ChangeProperty request T

Bug#219039: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: sis630 problem: drmAgpAcquire failed)

2003-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:18:11 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219039: Sorry, this is a Brown Paper Bag Bug... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

XFree86 4.4.0 release plans - maybe it's a time to start debian packaging ?

2003-11-04 Thread Mantas Kriaučiūnas
Hi, >From http://www.xfree86.org/releaseplans.html : The next full release of XFree86 will be 4.4.0. The schedule for this release is: *Feature freeze: 15 October 2003. *Code freeze: 28 November 2003. *Release date: 15 December 2003. New development snapshots of this release are available bimon