Bug#45216: maybe it should be closed ?

2002-11-14 Thread Sven Luther
Hello Branden, i was looking at the list of bugs i filled searching for one in particular, and found this one. It is more than 3 days old, applies to a package version we don't ship anymore, and anyway, you don't build xfree86v3 for powerpc anymore. Maybe it should be closed, don't you think ? If

Bug#168601: default {x|g|k|w}dm: why not "disable" as a choice

2002-11-14 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Branden Robinson [Wed, Nov 13 2002, 12:59:42PM]: > > Even the fact XDM is not started during the installation is a > > potentialy dangerous surprise. > > What's "dangerous" about it? > > Having a sudden VT switch in the middle of your upgrade procedure is > also a surprise. Imagine

Bug#168601: default {x|g|k|w}dm: why not "disable" as a choice

2002-11-14 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Branden Robinson [Wed, Nov 13 2002, 06:24:22PM]: > > and also very bad news if you happen to have a getty on vt7, as you > > just lost the ability to use the machine locally. > > Now, cut out that talkin' sense, boy; ol' Bloch has already made up his > mind. Bla. Come down. Did you n

Bug#45216: maybe it should be closed ?

2002-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 04:53:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Branden, i was looking at the list of bugs i filled searching for one in > particular, and found this one. It is more than 3 days old, applies to a > package version we don't ship anymore, and anyway, you don't build > xfree86v3 for pow

Bug#169170: xserver-xfree86: sporadic system lockups running xscreensaver with ATI Radeon QD

2002-11-14 Thread jeff
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-3 Severity: normal When I come back and find the machine locked up the display is usually blank but a couple of times it has had nerverot from xscreensaver frozen on it. This has been going on since 4.2.x entered unstable (and hence my machine). The freque

Bug#168601: default {x|g|k|w}dm: why not "disable" as a choice

2002-11-14 Thread Warren Turkal
On Thursday 14 November 2002 02:20 pm, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > What's a login-manager? Maybe x-display-manager is a better choice of wording? Warren -- Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc. http://www.golum.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#45216: maybe it should be closed ?

2002-11-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:44:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 04:53:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Branden, i was looking at the list of bugs i filled searching for one in > > particular, and found this one. It is more than 3 days old, applies to a > > package vers

Bug#169019: (startx fails to start x from console). FIX

2002-11-14 Thread David Lawyer
I have found the cause of this problem and its solution. The problem is in the file /etc/Xsession (global Xsession file -- used by display managers and xinit (startx)) supplied by the xfree86-common package. So please forward it to the maintainer of that package. In the above file there is funct

Bug#168947: marked as done (Unable to open /dev/agpgart)

2002-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:59:53PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > It doesn't say 'No such file or directory' but 'No such device', meaning > the driver isn't available, i.e. the agpgart module isn't loaded or > isn't available. Ah, ENODEV, not ENOENT. Thanks for pointing that out. -- G. Branden

Bug#169019: startx fails to start x from console

2002-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 05:18:32PM -0800, David Lawyer wrote: > Package: xbase-clients > Version: 4.2.1-3 > > When I type startx at the console, it creates an X window with an x in > the center but it only lasts for about 1 second. I then get back to the > text interface with "waiting for X serve

urgent

2002-11-14 Thread mlaoverseas
dear sir, Please quote ASAP, Please include lead time.   Keyboard with Trackball- IBM # 01K1260 - 6 pcs   Regards,   Ronald/manila overseas inc. fax:  36-2-498-0288 tel:  63-2-400-7685 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#166234: xserver-xfree86: Removing patch 009_i810_xv_blue_bar_fix.diff fixes problem on i810e

2002-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:29:18PM -0600, Tim Pope wrote: > I'm having the same problem on a similar setup with an i810e. > Removing debian/patches/009_i810_xv_blue_bar_fix.diff and rebuilding > fixes it for me. This fails to address bug #131602, which the patch > was the original purpose of the p

Bug#169055: xserver-xfree86: [mga] XF86Config-4 now gives "out-of range" errors (worked with 4.1)

2002-11-14 Thread Faheem Mitha
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-3 Severity: important Hi Branden, I see that reportbug includes my XF86Config-4 and /var/log/XFree86.0.log by default, saving me the trouble. Impressive. Anyway, this config file used to work with 4.1, but not with 4.2. I only discovered this today. I'm tra

Bug#45216: maybe it should be closed ?

2002-11-14 Thread Sven Luther
Hello Branden, i was looking at the list of bugs i filled searching for one in particular, and found this one. It is more than 3 days old, applies to a package version we don't ship anymore, and anyway, you don't build xfree86v3 for powerpc anymore. Maybe it should be closed, don't you think ? If

Bug#168601: default {x|g|k|w}dm: why not "disable" as a choice

2002-11-14 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Branden Robinson [Wed, Nov 13 2002, 12:59:42PM]: > > Even the fact XDM is not started during the installation is a > > potentialy dangerous surprise. > > What's "dangerous" about it? > > Having a sudden VT switch in the middle of your upgrade procedure is > also a surprise. Imagine

Bug#168601: default {x|g|k|w}dm: why not "disable" as a choice

2002-11-14 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Branden Robinson [Wed, Nov 13 2002, 06:24:22PM]: > > and also very bad news if you happen to have a getty on vt7, as you > > just lost the ability to use the machine locally. > > Now, cut out that talkin' sense, boy; ol' Bloch has already made up his > mind. Bla. Come down. Did you n

Bug#45216: maybe it should be closed ?

2002-11-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 04:53:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Branden, i was looking at the list of bugs i filled searching for one in > particular, and found this one. It is more than 3 days old, applies to a > package version we don't ship anymore, and anyway, you don't build > xfree86v3 for pow