On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 10:17:17AM +0200, Steinar Bang wrote:
> Are read-edid and mdetect useful for configuring XFree86 4.1.0?
> Doesn't "XFree86 -configure" do a better job?
You tell me.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=77120&repeatmerged=yes
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
Branden Robinson writes:
> 1) I personally don't care, since I remap the funny keys on the bottom
> row to suit my own strange tastes anyway;
> 2) I don't want to subject my users to shock and horror.
> 3) I don't want to deviate gratuitously from upstream practice.
> I'd appreciate input from th
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 10:17:17AM +0200, Steinar Bang wrote:
>> Are read-edid and mdetect useful for configuring XFree86 4.1.0?
>> Doesn't "XFree86 -configure" do a better job?
> You tell me.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=77120
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[debian-x, please CC me as I am not subscribed]
Hi folks,
I need to connect my laptop (Latitude C610) to a not-so-modern beamer,
which supports displaying the 1024x768 screen of the desktop machine
sitting next to it. However, when I tell it to display my screen, it
simply says:
Not available.
"Charl P. Botha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had a look at your X output and all seems fine. How many FPS does
> glxgears yield? You have to run it for at least 5 seconds before it outputs
> something to stdout.
glxgears, in its default small size is about 500 fps, expanding the
window to f
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 19:09, martin f krafft wrote:
> [debian-x, please CC me as I am not subscribed]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to connect my laptop (Latitude C610) to a not-so-modern beamer,
> which supports displaying the 1024x768 screen of the desktop machine
> sitting next to it. However, when
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> The alternative to the compose mechanism -- using the input method
> mechanism -- is just too nasty to consider. End of offtopic.)
Is that the same as the 'altgr' key?
> I can personally confirm that the non-Greek compose fi
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:39, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> "Charl P. Botha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I had a look at your X output and all seems fine. How many FPS does
> > glxgears yield? You have to run it for at least 5 seconds before it outputs
> > something to stdout.
>
> glxgears, in its
In your message of: 24 Jul 2002 23:22:23 +0200, you write:
>The size of the latter's window doesn't seem to impact the framerate here,
>so that sounds like software rendering.
Xscreensaver's gears does about 50 fps at its default size, 25 fps in
a maximized window, and 5 fps in full screen saved m
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 00:17, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> In your message of: 24 Jul 2002 23:22:23 +0200, you write:
> >The size of the latter's window doesn't seem to impact the framerate here,
> >so that sounds like software rendering.
>
> Xscreensaver's gears does about 50 fps at its default size, 25 f
In your message of: 25 Jul 2002 00:31:18 +0200, you write:
>Around 45 fps in both cases here.
It must be limited to about 50, because that is what I get on my
Mobility r128 laptop and on the old system with the mga card.
>There seems to be a bug in the current DRI code which prevents direct
>rend
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 01:02, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> In your message of: 25 Jul 2002 00:31:18 +0200, you write:
> >Around 45 fps in both cases here.
>
> It must be limited to about 50, because that is what I get on my
> Mobility r128 laptop and on the old system with the mga card.
Yes, it has a 0.02
> [debian-x, please CC me as I am not subscribed]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to connect my laptop (Latitude C610) to a not-so-modern beamer,
> which supports displaying the 1024x768 screen of the desktop machine
...
> martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
> \ echo mailto
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 10:17:17AM +0200, Steinar Bang wrote:
> Are read-edid and mdetect useful for configuring XFree86 4.1.0?
> Doesn't "XFree86 -configure" do a better job?
You tell me.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=77120&repeatmerged=yes
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Branden Robinson writes:
> 1) I personally don't care, since I remap the funny keys on the bottom
> row to suit my own strange tastes anyway;
> 2) I don't want to subject my users to shock and horror.
> 3) I don't want to deviate gratuitously from upstream practice.
> I'd appreciate input from t
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 10:17:17AM +0200, Steinar Bang wrote:
>> Are read-edid and mdetect useful for configuring XFree86 4.1.0?
>> Doesn't "XFree86 -configure" do a better job?
> You tell me.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7712
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
"Charl P. Botha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had a look at your X output and all seems fine. How many FPS does
> glxgears yield? You have to run it for at least 5 seconds before it outputs
> something to stdout.
glxgears, in its default small size is about 500 fps, expanding the
window to
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> The alternative to the compose mechanism -- using the input method
> mechanism -- is just too nasty to consider. End of offtopic.)
Is that the same as the 'altgr' key?
> I can personally confirm that the non-Greek compose f
[debian-x, please CC me as I am not subscribed]
Hi folks,
I need to connect my laptop (Latitude C610) to a not-so-modern beamer,
which supports displaying the 1024x768 screen of the desktop machine
sitting next to it. However, when I tell it to display my screen, it
simply says:
Not available
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 19:09, martin f krafft wrote:
> [debian-x, please CC me as I am not subscribed]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to connect my laptop (Latitude C610) to a not-so-modern beamer,
> which supports displaying the 1024x768 screen of the desktop machine
> sitting next to it. However, whe
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:39, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> "Charl P. Botha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I had a look at your X output and all seems fine. How many FPS does
> > glxgears yield? You have to run it for at least 5 seconds before it outputs
> > something to stdout.
>
> glxgears, in it
In your message of: 24 Jul 2002 23:22:23 +0200, you write:
>The size of the latter's window doesn't seem to impact the framerate here,
>so that sounds like software rendering.
Xscreensaver's gears does about 50 fps at its default size, 25 fps in
a maximized window, and 5 fps in full screen saved
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 00:17, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> In your message of: 24 Jul 2002 23:22:23 +0200, you write:
> >The size of the latter's window doesn't seem to impact the framerate here,
> >so that sounds like software rendering.
>
> Xscreensaver's gears does about 50 fps at its default size, 25
In your message of: 25 Jul 2002 00:31:18 +0200, you write:
>Around 45 fps in both cases here.
It must be limited to about 50, because that is what I get on my
Mobility r128 laptop and on the old system with the mga card.
>There seems to be a bug in the current DRI code which prevents direct
>ren
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 01:02, Jeff Lessem wrote:
> In your message of: 25 Jul 2002 00:31:18 +0200, you write:
> >Around 45 fps in both cases here.
>
> It must be limited to about 50, because that is what I get on my
> Mobility r128 laptop and on the old system with the mga card.
Yes, it has a 0.0
> [debian-x, please CC me as I am not subscribed]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to connect my laptop (Latitude C610) to a not-so-modern beamer,
> which supports displaying the 1024x768 screen of the desktop machine
...
> martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
> \ echo mailt
> Yeah, I thought it would be some strange bug, or an interaction with
> the AMD 760 AGP bridge, or something like that. I was just hoping
> to hear about some special REALLY_GO_FAST=t type thing that I didn't
> know to set.
I had exactly the same problem with a Radeon VE. It worked just fine
i
29 matches
Mail list logo
