- Forwarded message from Oliver Elphick -
From: "Oliver Elphick"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: There is a website that crashes X 4.0
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:06:02 +
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-War
I'm not even sure what he's talking about. Most North Americans know
nothing of deadkeys. I'm certainly among them. (I know what they are, but
none of the specifics he seems to expect.)
- Forwarded message from Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTE
- Forwarded message from Giuliano Grandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Giuliano Grandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: X 4.0.1-6: problems
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:28:48 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On top of that, if he wants harsh, he should read posts by Theo de Raadt
or D.J. Bernstein (sp?) some time. Someone even drew a rough picture of
Theo clubbing someone for not reading manpages. >:-> Hehehe.
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001121 22:41]:
> I'm not even sure what he's talkin
Giuliano, I posted much the same question as your #1 yesterday, and
someone had posted a response to my question shortly after I asked.
Check the debian-x archives for their response. :)
Regarding xf86cfg, this is to be expected. It is not nearly ready to be
called a production tool. You can use d
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is correct, it goes like this:
Looks like I'd got it right then. I really recommend the DRI user
guide at sourceforge
http://dri.sourceforge.net/DRIuserguide.html
it gives, I think, a nice overview.
> * 3dfx DRM kernel module
A
This is probably the problem with 2.4 and no font server running. If
you check the log output, I bet the last message is probing the mouse.
Try commenting out the font server from XF86Config-4, or
alternatively (which I haven't tested), run a local font server before
you start X.
-kzm
--
If I
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Marc Martinez wrote:
|a much simpler test than working out proper grep semantics is the following:
|
|[ -c /dev/.devfsd ]
|
|Marc
That one works nicely for me and I don't use devfsd. :-)
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailt
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:33:49PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
> all that is needed to get X4.0 built on m68k. If my machine hadn't crashed
> three times in a row during the install target, I might have tested them
I had this problem after did a
# apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrad
today. Backspace does not work anymore.
I had the similar situation with the guy who
had this problem too, i.e. I still use the xserver-common-v3
and XF86_SVGA because my video card savage 3D is not supported
by XFree86 4.0.1 y
Like others, I ran into the xserver-xfree86 problems of the last few days.
When I upgraded from 4.0.1-5 to 4.0.1-6 yesterday morning, I had the same
problems that have been mentioned on this list. This morning, I upgraded to
4.0.1-7. While I am not having problems starting X (I created the sy
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I've just upgraded to XFree86 4.0.1 (thanks for the packages,
> Branden!) and have encountered a bug in video mode detection with the
> Mach64 drivers.
> Consider this XF86Config fragment:
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "ViewSonic E771"
> Hor
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 12:11:34PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> > I've just upgraded to XFree86 4.0.1 (thanks for the packages,
> > Branden!) and have encountered a bug in video mode detection with the
> > Mach64 drivers.
...
> > (--) ATI(0): V
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > > I've just upgraded to XFree86 4.0.1 (thanks for the packages,
> > > Branden!) and have encountered a bug in video mode detection with the
> > > Mach64 drivers.
> > > (--) ATI(0): Virtual size is 1152x864 (pitch 1152)
> > > (**) ATI(0): Default mode
Thank you very much for providing these. I'm very glad to see m68k
rejoining the bleeding-edge-XFree86 fold.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:33:49PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
> all that is needed to get X4.0 built on
- Forwarded message from Rodolfo García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Rodolfo García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error in XKB
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:56:59 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:
It may be that only XF4 supports this version of the i810 chipset...
- Forwarded message from Kirk Ismay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Kirk Ismay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Intel i815 & Debian 2.2
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:32:55 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Marc Martinez wrote:
|a much simpler test than working out proper grep semantics is the following:
|
|[ -c /dev/.devfsd ]
|
|Marc
That one works nicely for me and I don't use devfsd. :-)
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mail
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:33:49PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
> all that is needed to get X4.0 built on m68k. If my machine hadn't crashed
> three times in a row during the install target, I might have tested them
I had this problem after did a
# apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrad
today. Backspace does not work anymore.
I had the similar situation with the guy who
had this problem too, i.e. I still use the xserver-common-v3
and XF86_SVGA because my video card savage 3D is not supported
by XFree86 4.0.1
Like others, I ran into the xserver-xfree86 problems of the last few days. When I
upgraded from 4.0.1-5 to 4.0.1-6 yesterday morning, I had the same problems that have
been mentioned on this list. This morning, I upgraded to 4.0.1-7. While I am not
having problems starting X (I created the s
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I've just upgraded to XFree86 4.0.1 (thanks for the packages,
> Branden!) and have encountered a bug in video mode detection with the
> Mach64 drivers.
> Consider this XF86Config fragment:
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "ViewSonic E771"
> Ho
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 12:11:34PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> > I've just upgraded to XFree86 4.0.1 (thanks for the packages,
> > Branden!) and have encountered a bug in video mode detection with the
> > Mach64 drivers.
...
> > (--) ATI(0):
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > > I've just upgraded to XFree86 4.0.1 (thanks for the packages,
> > > Branden!) and have encountered a bug in video mode detection with the
> > > Mach64 drivers.
> > > (--) ATI(0): Virtual size is 1152x864 (pitch 1152)
> > > (**) ATI(0): Default mode
Thank you very much for providing these. I'm very glad to see m68k
rejoining the bleeding-edge-XFree86 fold.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 10:33:49PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> can you please add these patches for your next version. It seems they are
> all that is needed to get X4.0 built o
- Forwarded message from Rodolfo García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Rodolfo García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error in XKB
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:56:59 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To
It may be that only XF4 supports this version of the i810 chipset...
- Forwarded message from Kirk Ismay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Kirk Ismay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Intel i815 & Debian 2.2
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:32:55 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27 matches
Mail list logo
