On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Zack Weinberg wrote:

> > > I've just upgraded to XFree86 4.0.1 (thanks for the packages,
> > > Branden!) and have encountered a bug in video mode detection with the
> > > Mach64 drivers.

> > > (--) ATI(0): Virtual size is 1152x864 (pitch 1152)
> > > (**) ATI(0): Default mode "1024x768": 94.5 MHz, 68.7 kHz, 85.0 Hz
> > > (**) ATI(0): Default mode "1152x864": 108.0 MHz, 67.5 kHz, 75.0 Hz
> > > (--) ATI(0): Display dimensions: (32, 24) cm
> > > (--) ATI(0): DPI set to (91, 91)

> > > But in that mode the right hand two-thirds of the screen is mangled.
> > > It appears as if the image has been duplicated, shifted right about a
> > > hundred pixels, distorted, and overlaid on the original.  With massive
> > > flicker.  xvidtune cannot help.

> > > If I reduce the depth to 16, then both 3.3.6 and 4.0.1 accept 1152x864
> > > and display it correctly.

> > What about -depth 24 -fbbpp 24?  If that works fine, then fbbpp 32 (the
> > default) at 108MHz is simply asking too much out of your video memory.

> Yes, -fbbpp 24 displays correctly.  Is it feasible to make the driver
> detect this automatically?

Not entirely.  I have no reliable means of detecting the video memory
width.

Marc.

+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|  Marc Aurele La France           |  work:   1-780-492-9310           |
|  Computing and Network Services  |  fax:    1-780-492-1729           |
|  352 General Services Building   |  email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]          |
|  University of Alberta           +-----------------------------------+
|  Edmonton, Alberta               |                                   |
|  T6G 2H1                         |     Standard disclaimers apply    |
|  CANADA                          |                                   |
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
XFree86 Core Team member.  ATI driver and X server internals.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to