Someone please tell him not to mail bugs to me privately, and also that
this bug has already been filed 3 times?
- Forwarded message from Yoriyosi Hattori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Yoriyosi Hattori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (bug) xserver-xfree86_4.0.1-5
Date: Sa
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 01:46:44AM +0100, Matthijs Melchior wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is a little patch to `dexter', that makes two enhancements.
>
> Add `-s' to enable selecting another X server even if the current one
> is recognized [used for generating `XF86Config-4' in an older environment].
My inbox has literally exploded with bugs since I released 4.0.1. Perhaps
100 or more have been filed.
The bugs are coming in faster than I can do triage on them.
I am literally overwhelmed.
I would appreciate it if those on this list could do what they can as
described on the X Strike Force pa
Someone please direct this person to the Debian X FAQ (or quote it for
him), which has a very long section on troubleshooting this very issue.
You don't know how proud it makes me to see those FAQ's I write go unread,
year after year...
- Forwarded message from Andrew MacKinnon <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:26:14PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, all. I finally succeeded in compiling K6-optimized X binaries for
> XF4.0.1.
Are these optimizations also benificial for the K7 (Athlon) line of
CPU's?
<>
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 04:38:24PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> I was grepping debian-bugs-dist for X bugs and I was wondering if you
> were willing to set the maintainer of the X packages to something like
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have the bugs copied over here. This is a lot
> more rel
Since he was nice to me in the first sentence, please be nice to him. :)
I think he probably just needs a URL to Raphael Bossek's packages. Anyone
know it?
- Forwarded message from Stefano Peluchetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Stefano Peluchetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
i can't configure xfree4 for Voodoo3
the glide 2 and glide 3 librairies are installed on my woody.
There is the log.
Encolpe
--
Celui qui est capable de marcher derri鋨e une musique militaire
n'a pas besoin d'un cerveau: une mo螔le 廧ini鋨e lui suffit.
Albert Einstein
<>
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:01:24AM +0100, Jelmer Feenstra wrote:
> Well actually my problems were even worse. I had X constantly crashing
> every once in a while, it would just fly back into textmode. I solved
> this by downgrading the packages, perhaps updated woody packages fix
> this as well.
Yoriyosi,
Please do not email Branden directly. Email debian-user if you think the
problem is common, or debian-x if you think the problem is unique to the
Debian packaging of X. In this case, I believe it is unique to the
debian packaging of X, so debian-x would be the correct address to
email.
Tony, you are the lucky recipient of the navidad virus. Figure out how
to remove it.
[Check the debian-x archives if this email makes no sense to you. You
sent an email to debian-x containing the text here, and navidad.exe, the
latest winblows virus going around. :]
* ?K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [
It appears that someone on this list has just been infected by the
Navidad virus.
Do not open attachments named navidad.exe. Details can be found here.
http://www.norton.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.navidad.html
All the best,
Hajime Saito
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 05:24:37PM +0900, Hajime Saito wrote:
>
> It appears that someone on this list has just been infected by the
> Navidad virus.
> Do not open attachments named navidad.exe. Details can be found here.
Okay, who's the closet Windows user? ;)
--
Joshua Shagam
I have been told that -march=k6 may not be beneficial for athlons. But
some compilers may be able to use -march=k7. See previous emails on this
subject. Thanks.
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
Hi there,
if brandens packages are recent then you should get 32bpp and dri to
work together. It works here but I do use a cvs snapshot from
dri.sourceforge.net.
> > Hi Brande
> >
> > Great work you have made with your new xserver package - however
> > I would like to know why have you removed MG
> It's strange, because a guy from the list, with the same hardware than me
> (Dell Latitude CPi, Neomagic MagicGraph) says that he has been running
> pre-4.0.1 debs in 1024x768 perfectly well.
FWIW, I've got a Compaq Presario 1236 with a NeoMagic chipset running
just fine in its 800x600 mode w
Can someone at least temporarily filter [EMAIL PROTECTED] off the
debian-x list? he is apparently running a windows email client that has
been infected with the navidad virus and is flooding the list with
copies of old mails with virus attachments.
randolph
--
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You should ask listmaster@ for such a request!
It's installed. Since there were only a couple of such mails I
thought that he had his problem fixed already.
Randolph Chung wrote:
> Can someone at least temporarily filter [EMAIL PROTECTED] off the
> debian-x list? he is apparently running a windo
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:03:29AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
Can't do this because people can and may have, for instance, xserver-svga
and xserver-xfree86 installed simultaneous
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001118 12:44]:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:03:29AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> > I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
>
> Can't do this because people can and may have, for
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 02:14:04PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Hmm. No, there really isn't a good way of dealing with this.
I've made a debconf note that will attempt to club people over the head.
--
G. Branden Robinson | When I die I want to go peacefully in
Debian GNU/Linux
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 03:36:17PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >From what I recall, dri didn't make any difference. I've a feeling that it
> may have been dbe that reduced the corruption when removed, but I'll check
> that when I'm back with the machine this evening.
Right. Removing DRI makes
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 02:20:23AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 03:36:17PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > >From what I recall, dri didn't make any difference. I've a feeling
> > >that it
> > may have been dbe that reduced the corruption when removed, but I'll
> > ch
It appears that someone on this list has just been infected by the
Navidad virus.
Do not open attachments named navidad.exe. Details can be found here.
http://www.norton.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.navidad.html
All the best,
Hajime Saito
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 05:24:37PM +0900, Hajime Saito wrote:
>
> It appears that someone on this list has just been infected by the
> Navidad virus.
> Do not open attachments named navidad.exe. Details can be found here.
Okay, who's the closet Windows user? ;)
--
Joshua Shagam
I have been told that -march=k6 may not be beneficial for athlons. But
some compilers may be able to use -march=k7. See previous emails on this
subject. Thanks.
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
Hi there,
if brandens packages are recent then you should get 32bpp and dri to
work together. It works here but I do use a cvs snapshot from
dri.sourceforge.net.
> > Hi Brande
> >
> > Great work you have made with your new xserver package - however
> > I would like to know why have you removed M
> It's strange, because a guy from the list, with the same hardware than me
> (Dell Latitude CPi, Neomagic MagicGraph) says that he has been running
> pre-4.0.1 debs in 1024x768 perfectly well.
FWIW, I've got a Compaq Presario 1236 with a NeoMagic chipset running
just fine in its 800x600 mode
Can someone at least temporarily filter [EMAIL PROTECTED] off the
debian-x list? he is apparently running a windows email client that has
been infected with the navidad virus and is flooding the list with
copies of old mails with virus attachments.
randolph
--
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should ask listmaster@ for such a request!
It's installed. Since there were only a couple of such mails I
thought that he had his problem fixed already.
Randolph Chung wrote:
> Can someone at least temporarily filter [EMAIL PROTECTED] off the
> debian-x list? he is apparently running a wind
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:03:29AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
Can't do this because people can and may have, for instance, xserver-svga
and xserver-xfree86 installed simultaneou
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001118 12:44]:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:03:29AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> > I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
>
> Can't do this because people can and may have, for
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 02:14:04PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Hmm. No, there really isn't a good way of dealing with this.
I've made a debconf note that will attempt to club people over the head.
--
G. Branden Robinson | When I die I want to go peacefully in
Debian GNU/Linux
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 03:36:17PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >From what I recall, dri didn't make any difference. I've a feeling that it
> may have been dbe that reduced the corruption when removed, but I'll check
> that when I'm back with the machine this evening.
Right. Removing DRI make
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 02:20:23AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 03:36:17PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > >From what I recall, dri didn't make any difference. I've a feeling
> > >that it
> > may have been dbe that reduced the corruption when removed, but I'll
> > c
35 matches
Mail list logo
