Re: xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v18 use static libz

2000-10-19 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 04:42:23PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > I've rebuilt and checked xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v18 on my machine. > It does not have "#define HasZlib YES" line in host.def, so build > and use libz.a included in source (xc/lib/zlib) > > I think that to use libz.so included i

Re: xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v18 use static libz

2000-10-19 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 04:42:23PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > I've rebuilt and checked xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v18 on my machine. > It does not have "#define HasZlib YES" line in host.def, so build > and use libz.a included in source (xc/lib/zlib) > > I think that to use libz.so included

xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v18 use static libz

2000-10-19 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
Hi, I've rebuilt and checked xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v18 on my machine. It does not have "#define HasZlib YES" line in host.def, so build and use libz.a included in source (xc/lib/zlib) I think that to use libz.so included in zlib1g-dev is better. Patch bellow: diff -urN xfree86-4.0.1.OLD/de

xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v18 use static libz

2000-10-19 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
Hi, I've rebuilt and checked xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v18 on my machine. It does not have "#define HasZlib YES" line in host.def, so build and use libz.a included in source (xc/lib/zlib) I think that to use libz.so included in zlib1g-dev is better. Patch bellow: diff -urN xfree86-4.0.1.OLD/d