Hi,
I've rebuilt and checked xfree86_4.0.1-0phase2v18 on my machine.
It does not have "#define HasZlib YES" line in host.def, so build
and use libz.a included in source (xc/lib/zlib)
I think that to use libz.so included in zlib1g-dev is better.
Patch bellow:
diff -urN xfree86-4.0.1.OLD/debian/MANIFEST.i386 xfree86-4.0.1/debian/MANIFEST.i386
--- xfree86-4.0.1.OLD/debian/MANIFEST.i386 Thu Oct 19 16:11:42 2000
+++ xfree86-4.0.1/debian/MANIFEST.i386 Thu Oct 19 16:25:59 2000
@@ -2651,7 +2651,6 @@
usr/X11R6/lib/libxkbfile.a
usr/X11R6/lib/libxkbui.a
usr/X11R6/lib/libxrx.so.6.3
-usr/X11R6/lib/libz.a
usr/X11R6/lib/modules/codeconv/libARABIC.a
usr/X11R6/lib/modules/codeconv/libARMSCII8.a
usr/X11R6/lib/modules/codeconv/libBIG5.a
diff -urN xfree86-4.0.1.OLD/debian/patches/100_debian_host.def.diff
xfree86-4.0.1/debian/patches/100_debian_host.def.diff
--- xfree86-4.0.1.OLD/debian/patches/100_debian_host.def.diff Thu Oct 19 16:11:40
2000
+++ xfree86-4.0.1/debian/patches/100_debian_host.def.diff Thu Oct 19 16:25:41
+2000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
--- /dev/null Wed Jun 7 10:48:23 2000
+++ xc/config/cf/host.def Thu Jul 6 19:05:20 2000
-@@ -0,0 +1,707 @@
+@@ -0,0 +1,708 @@
+XCOMM $XFree86: xc/config/cf/xf86site.def,v 3.162 2000/05/31 07:14:52 eich Exp $
+/******************************************************************************/
+/*
@@ -708,3 +708,4 @@
+#define SharedLibFont NO
+#define SharedLibXft NO
+#define SharedLibXrender NO
++#define HasZlib YES
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]