On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:54:48AM +, Edward Betts wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:42:33AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:33:14PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
> > > Out of curiosity, I would appreciate if someone could summup the current
> > > state o
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:42:33AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:33:14PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, I would appreciate if someone could summup the current
> > state of xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5 packages and what does prevent them to
> > en
Branden Robinson a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:33:14PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
Out of curiosity, I would appreciate if someone could summup the current
state of xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5 packages and what does prevent them to
enter sid (appart from left over from the compromisi
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:33:14PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
> Out of curiosity, I would appreciate if someone could summup the current
> state of xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v5 packages and what does prevent them to
> enter sid (appart from left over from the compromision).
http://necrotic.de
Hi all,
No answer after 3 days, let's reword it.
To my knowledge, the following Intel chipsets
(830M/845G/852GM/855GM/865G) are unsupported in Xfree86-4.2.1 hence
unsupported in the current sid packages.
They are supported in Xfree-4.3 (cf. [1] or [2] ).
From [1] "Does XFree86 4.2.0 or 4.2.1
Hi again,
Can someone from the X task force clarify what are the plans for X in
sarge ?
My reading of this list-achives +
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xsf/XFree86/NEWS.xhtml let me think there
is a trend to get X-4.3 in sid pretty soon.
Is it aimed at sarge too ?
@+,
Fab
6 matches
Mail list logo
