hi,
okay, this is the last post that will go to each of the BR's mentioned above.
Future posts should go to debian-x only, along with any individuals who wish
to be CC'd (myself included, since i'm not subscribed to debian-x).
anyway, i've updated the wiki documentation for the current stat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> i thought this was about the new packages, well, i think i got
> confused.. sorry.
I was thinking about the _new_ packages too, just to make our work
easier before handing it over to the pkg-xorg team (and perhaps even
after i
sean finney wrote:
> personally, i would rather any and all effort be spent on making the new
> packages rather than maintaining the old ones...
i thought this was about the new packages, well, i think i got
confused.. sorry.
> anyway, I'll try to set aside some time tonight to do the
> documen
On Thursday 01 November 2007 05:41:29 pm Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > (s/svn/git/)
> >
> > however, collab thing would be very nice.
>
> OK, may I create a git repository (or a directory, if git.d.o has been
> set up the same way as svn.d.o) based on the packages found a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Baumann wrote:
>
> (s/svn/git/)
>
> however, collab thing would be very nice.
>
OK, may I create a git repository (or a directory, if git.d.o has been
set up the same way as svn.d.o) based on the packages found at[0] then?
Any objections?
C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey there
sean finney wrote:
> i was thinking that we could remove the tag when the non-cdbs using packages
> were uploaded. but if you want to remove it in your next version, thats
> totally fine. we should just come up with some kind of way to d
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
> How about setting up a collab-maint SVN repository for this pre pkg-xorg
> package? Then we could all work on the same code base while it doesn't
> change hands.
(s/svn/git/)
however, collab thing would be very nice.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstr
hi emilio,
On Thursday 01 November 2007 03:36:14 am Emilio Scalise wrote:
> Why the version number still includes ~emiscabpo? I've added that to
> differentiate packages from my repository to the official debian ones.
> But now they would become official debian packages, this release tag
> could b
That's great. In the next days I'll watch these diffs and I'll tell you
what should be changed according to me.
Why the version number still includes ~emiscabpo? I've added that to
differentiate packages from my repository to the official debian ones.
But now they would become official debian
hi emilio et al,
As previously discussed, i've uploaded modified versions of the packages
emilio has made available. The modifications have included mostly lintian
related fixes and other packaging fixes, which should be fixed in the next
version of your packages.
attached to this mail are a
10 matches
Mail list logo
