IM> I've seen XFree86 4.02 X server to crash when WINE have calculated
IM> font metrics for TTF fonts.
(This should be fixed in 4.0.3; it was a bug introduced in the 4.0.2
version of the TrueType backend. More fixes for 4.1.0.)
Using a font server in this case would not have saved you; instead o
IM> I've seen XFree86 4.02 X server to crash when WINE have calculated
IM> font metrics for TTF fonts.
(This should be fixed in 4.0.3; it was a bug introduced in the 4.0.2
version of the TrueType backend. More fixes for 4.1.0.)
Using a font server in this case would not have saved you; instead
On 18 Apr 2001 19:26:26 +0400, Ilya Martynov said:
>
> MD> Sorry for the OT post, but I am allergic to misinformation. ;)
>
> MD> ashridah wrote:
>
> >> i don't particularly like xfs. don't know why. seems a little useless to
> >> have a server for one box.
> >> perhaps for diskless Xte
On 18 Apr 2001 19:26:26 +0400, Ilya Martynov said:
>
> MD> Sorry for the OT post, but I am allergic to misinformation. ;)
>
> MD> ashridah wrote:
>
> >> i don't particularly like xfs. don't know why. seems a little useless to
> >> have a server for one box.
> >> perhaps for diskless Xt
MD> Sorry for the OT post, but I am allergic to misinformation. ;)
MD> ashridah wrote:
>> i don't particularly like xfs. don't know why. seems a little useless to
>> have a server for one box.
>> perhaps for diskless Xterminals, maybe. nevertheless.
MD> A font server makes a lot of sense even o
Sorry for the OT post, but I am allergic to misinformation. ;)
ashridah wrote:
> i don't particularly like xfs. don't know why. seems a little useless to
> have a server for one box.
> perhaps for diskless Xterminals, maybe. nevertheless.
A font server makes a lot of sense even on a single mach
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:37:50 +0200, Gert Langrock said:
> Hello,
>
> on sunday I did a apt-get upgrade on unstable and after
> this X was unable to start. It showed an error message
> saying that it was unable to load the default font
> "fixed". What is wrong and in which package? I also
>
MD> Sorry for the OT post, but I am allergic to misinformation. ;)
MD> ashridah wrote:
>> i don't particularly like xfs. don't know why. seems a little useless to
>> have a server for one box.
>> perhaps for diskless Xterminals, maybe. nevertheless.
MD> A font server makes a lot of sense even
Sorry for the OT post, but I am allergic to misinformation. ;)
ashridah wrote:
> i don't particularly like xfs. don't know why. seems a little useless to
> have a server for one box.
> perhaps for diskless Xterminals, maybe. nevertheless.
A font server makes a lot of sense even on a single mac
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:37:50 +0200, Gert Langrock said:
> Hello,
>
> on sunday I did a apt-get upgrade on unstable and after
> this X was unable to start. It showed an error message
> saying that it was unable to load the default font
> "fixed". What is wrong and in which package? I also
>
Hello,
on sunday I did a apt-get upgrade on unstable and after
this X was unable to start. It showed an error message
saying that it was unable to load the default font
"fixed". What is wrong and in which package? I also
use xfs although I am not shure whether the Xserver uses
it or not?
It would
Hello,
on sunday I did a apt-get upgrade on unstable and after
this X was unable to start. It showed an error message
saying that it was unable to load the default font
"fixed". What is wrong and in which package? I also
use xfs although I am not shure whether the Xserver uses
it or not?
It woul
12 matches
Mail list logo
