On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:16:02AM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 02:01, Daniel Stone escribió:
> > Bear in mind that one of the things that will bite us in the arse is
> > people who use the AC_PATH_XTRA autoconf macro to look for X, which
> > searches for Xt
El Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 02:01, Daniel Stone escribió:
> Bear in mind that one of the things that will bite us in the arse is
> people who use the AC_PATH_XTRA autoconf macro to look for X, which
> searches for Xt headers, so your Build-Depends is everything from X you
> use, plus libxt-dev.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:19:07PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> If you want to start grepping through the whole archive and finding all the
> packages that build-dep on xlibs-dev, and then start sending patches to
> every one, feel free. I'm not prepared to even think about doing that
> myself unt
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:00:47PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Martes, 19 de Julio de 2005 14:20, David Nusinow escribió:
> > These xlibmesa packages are gone and I haven't decided what to do about
> > xlibs-* yet. Transitioning the whole archive off them will take an enormous
> > amou
El Miércoles, 20 de Julio de 2005 03:53, Daniel Stone escribió:
[...]
> Since it used to build fine on SPARC (-2 got as far as MANIFEST before
> it bombed), the consensus was that this was a SPARC porter problem.
Mmmm...true, Daniel. Thanks for pointing it. There weren't functional
change
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:00:47PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Martes, 19 de Julio de 2005 14:20, David Nusinow escribió:
> > Because the first priority is to get the thing to build on all arches.
> > These stupid MANIFEST changes are something you only really have to do
> > once, but
El Martes, 19 de Julio de 2005 14:20, David Nusinow escribió:
> Because the first priority is to get the thing to build on all arches.
> These stupid MANIFEST changes are something you only really have to do
> once, but they need to be done to unblock a lot of things.
:-) All right, all ri
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:58:57AM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Lunes, 18 de Julio de 2005 21:50, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
> escribió:
> [...]
> > -xorg-x11 6.8.2-2 (unstable)
> > +xorg-x11 6.8.2-5 (unstable)
>
> Why -5? :-)
Because the first priority is to get the t
El Lunes, 18 de Julio de 2005 21:50, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
escribió:
[...]
> -xorg-x11 6.8.2-2 (unstable)
> +xorg-x11 6.8.2-5 (unstable)
Why -5? :-)
> -* Drop the Debian woody->sarge transitional packages:
> - + xlibmesa3
> - + xlibmesa3-dbg
> - + xlibmesa-dev
> - + xli
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-07-18 14:50:00 -0500 (Mon, 18 Jul 2005)
New Revision: 372
Modified:
trunk/debian/TODO
Log:
Update TODO list with already completed items
Modified: trunk/debian/TODO
===
--- trunk/debian/TODO 2005-07-1
10 matches
Mail list logo