Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-21 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:16:02AM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 02:01, Daniel Stone escribió: > > Bear in mind that one of the things that will bite us in the arse is > > people who use the AC_PATH_XTRA autoconf macro to look for X, which > > searches for Xt

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-21 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 02:01, Daniel Stone escribió: > Bear in mind that one of the things that will bite us in the arse is > people who use the AC_PATH_XTRA autoconf macro to look for X, which > searches for Xt headers, so your Build-Depends is everything from X you > use, plus libxt-dev.

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-21 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:19:07PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > If you want to start grepping through the whole archive and finding all the > packages that build-dep on xlibs-dev, and then start sending patches to > every one, feel free. I'm not prepared to even think about doing that > myself unt

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-21 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:00:47PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El Martes, 19 de Julio de 2005 14:20, David Nusinow escribió: > > These xlibmesa packages are gone and I haven't decided what to do about > > xlibs-* yet. Transitioning the whole archive off them will take an enormous > > amou

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-20 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El Miércoles, 20 de Julio de 2005 03:53, Daniel Stone escribió: [...] > Since it used to build fine on SPARC (-2 got as far as MANIFEST before > it bombed), the consensus was that this was a SPARC porter problem. Mmmm...true, Daniel. Thanks for pointing it. There weren't functional change

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-19 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:00:47PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El Martes, 19 de Julio de 2005 14:20, David Nusinow escribió: > > Because the first priority is to get the thing to build on all arches. > > These stupid MANIFEST changes are something you only really have to do > > once, but

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-19 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El Martes, 19 de Julio de 2005 14:20, David Nusinow escribió: > Because the first priority is to get the thing to build on all arches. > These stupid MANIFEST changes are something you only really have to do > once, but they need to be done to unblock a lot of things. :-) All right, all ri

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-19 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:58:57AM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El Lunes, 18 de Julio de 2005 21:50, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin > escribió: > [...] > > -xorg-x11 6.8.2-2 (unstable) > > +xorg-x11 6.8.2-5 (unstable) > > Why -5? :-) Because the first priority is to get the t

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-19 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El Lunes, 18 de Julio de 2005 21:50, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin escribió: [...] > -xorg-x11 6.8.2-2 (unstable) > +xorg-x11 6.8.2-5 (unstable) Why -5? :-) > -* Drop the Debian woody->sarge transitional packages: > - + xlibmesa3 > - + xlibmesa3-dbg > - + xlibmesa-dev > - + xli

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r372 - trunk/debian

2005-07-18 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2005-07-18 14:50:00 -0500 (Mon, 18 Jul 2005) New Revision: 372 Modified: trunk/debian/TODO Log: Update TODO list with already completed items Modified: trunk/debian/TODO === --- trunk/debian/TODO 2005-07-1