On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:48:42PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> >
> > And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
>
> Actualy I agree with that.
>
> > which is even more reason to split
> > the Debian-specific bits into a different file f
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > - you're moving stuff into debian.cf that isn't actualy debian-specific.
>> > when i said "gnu-common.cf" i meant stuff common to GNUish systems
>> > (mostly related to Glibc and userland), but not debian-sp
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:48:42PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> >
> > And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
>
> Actualy I agree with that.
>
> > which is even more reason to split
> > the Debian-specific bits into a different file f
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > - you're moving stuff into debian.cf that isn't actualy debian-specific.
>> > when i said "gnu-common.cf" i meant stuff common to GNUish systems
>> > (mostly related to Glibc and userland), but not debian-sp
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:33:35PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
> >Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
>
> Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system?
no. the GNU system is not a set of C
Robert Millan wrote:
ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system? Glibc
requires GCC[1], which in turn requires (in most cases[2]) GNU binutils.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/softw
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:33:35PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
> >Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
>
> Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system?
no. the GNU system is not a set of C
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
Actualy I agree with that.
> which is even more reason to split
> the Debian-specific bits into a different file from the GNU-specific bits.
That's fine; then there are only Glibc-specific bit
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:33:02AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>
> I don't think so.
> site.def uses site local specific setting.
> Distribution common settings should not into this file.
ok.
> >> - you're moving stuff into debian.cf that isn't actualy debian-specific.
> >> when i said "
Robert Millan wrote:
ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system? Glibc
requires GCC[1], which in turn requires (in most cases[2]) GNU binutils.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/l
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
Actualy I agree with that.
> which is even more reason to split
> the Debian-specific bits into a different file from the GNU-specific bits.
That's fine; then there are only Glibc-specific bit
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:33:02AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>
> I don't think so.
> site.def uses site local specific setting.
> Distribution common settings should not into this file.
ok.
> >> - you're moving stuff into debian.cf that isn't actualy debian-specific.
> >> when i said "
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:44:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> after looking at your TODO, i have a pair of comments on your plan:
>
> - i think site.def is a more adequate place for debian-specific stuff
> see what the upstream docs say about site.def (INSTALL-X.org, section 3.5)
I disagree
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:44:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, pleas
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:44:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> after looking at your TODO, i have a pair of comments on your plan:
>
> - i think site.def is a more adequate place for debian-specific stuff
> see what the upstream docs say about site.def (INSTALL-X.org, section 3.5)
I disagree
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:44:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it
> >> into a gnu-common.cf file so that it can be shared with gnu-freebsd.cf
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, pleas
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related
>> > defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf).
>>
>> Thanks, Ishikawa-san. I'll fix this up tonight, if you haven't alrea
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it
>> into a gnu-common.cf file so that it can be shared with gnu-freebsd.cf
>> (see the header comments in patch #820)
I just wrote same idea into
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it
> >> into a gnu-common.cf file so that it can be shared with gnu-freebsd.cf
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:55:06AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Author: daniel
> >> Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003)
> >> New Revision: 183
>
> >> Added:
> >>branches/4.3.0/sid/
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related
>> > defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf).
>>
>> Thanks, Ishikawa-san. I'll fix this up tonight, if you haven't alrea
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it
>> into a gnu-common.cf file so that it can be shared with gnu-freebsd.cf
>> (see the header comments in patch #820)
I just wrote same idea into
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:55:06AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> >> Added:
> >>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff
>
> Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related
> defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf).
thanks!
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:55:06AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Author: daniel
> >> Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003)
> >> New Revision: 183
>
> >> Added:
> >>branches/4.3.0/sid/
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:55:06AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> >> Added:
> >>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff
>
> Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related
> defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf).
thanks!
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: daniel
>> Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003)
>> New Revision: 183
>> Added:
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patch
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: daniel
>> Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003)
>> New Revision: 183
>> Added:
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patch
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 183
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/821_gnu-freebsd_xdm.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/822_gnu-freebsd_xload.diff
branches/4.3.
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 183
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/821_gnu-freebsd_xdm.diff
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/822_gnu-freebsd_xload.diff
branches/4.3.
32 matches
Mail list logo
