On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:52:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to
> a few porters tonight.
You could just point 'em at a specific date in the nightly tarballs.
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/
For Jack Howarth, the above
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:52:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to
> a few porters tonight.
You could just point 'em at a specific date in the nightly tarballs.
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/
For Jack Howarth, the above
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:58:57PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > > does not.. :/
> >
> > That's not what I seem to recall from recent traff
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > > + #define HasLinux
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 04:58:57PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > > does not.. :/
> >
> > That's not what I seem to recall from recent traff
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:35:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > > + #define HasLinux
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > does not.. :/
>
> That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k.
But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours proba
Fabio, I subscribe to this list; please do not CC me on replies.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:51:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge
> > the change over to branches/4.3.0/s
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:56:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > afaik 2.4 doesn't boot on all the m68k (ex)vendors... amiga does... mac
> > does not.. :/
>
> That's not what I seem to recall from recent traffic on debian-68k.
But it's true, my Mac does not boot with 2.4.20, and yours proba
Fabio, I subscribe to this list; please do not CC me on replies.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:51:19PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'll handle this for the trunk. Daniel or ISHIKAWA-san, can you merge
> > the change over to branches/4.3.0/s
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > > + #define HasLinuxInput Y
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
>> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
>> > >
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > + #define HasLinuxInput YES
> > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@
>
> This seems out-of-date?
Hmm,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > > + #define HasLinuxInput Y
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>> > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
>> > > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
>> > >
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
>>
>> Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
>> that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing,
>> not
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:32:16PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> > + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> > + #define HasLinuxInput YES
> > @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@
>
> This seems out-of-date?
Hmm,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing,
not everything. The current xf
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
>>
>> Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
>> that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing,
>> not
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> > --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev
>> > 171)
>> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-
X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + /* m68k has no 2.4 kernel yet */
> + # ifndef Mc68020Architecture
> + #define HasLinuxInput YES
> @@ -701,7 +714,7 @@
This seems out-of-date?
--
James
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev
> 171)
> +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev
> 172)
> @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@
> keyboard away from me.
>
>
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-10 06:44:45 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 172
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff
Log:
always disable FontLibSharedFreeType
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:17PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I believe changelog is a changelog, not a bug closer ;)
Yeah. Branden and I discussed it a while back, and our conclusion was
that we should only use the changelog for major events/news/bug-closing,
not everything. The current xf
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> > --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev 171)
>> > +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog2003-06-10 11:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:45:02AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> --- branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-09 21:54:42 UTC (rev 171)
> +++ branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog 2003-06-10 11:44:45 UTC (rev 172)
> @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@
> keyboard away from me.
>
>* #
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-10 06:44:45 -0500 (Tue, 10 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 172
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff
Log:
always disable FontLibSharedFreeType
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/003_
27 matches
Mail list logo
