On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 06:07:53PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 10:19:09PM -, Paul Keenan wrote:
> > I get the dim grey/green console effect (framebuffer
> > console) and also some intermittent font corruption
> > problems in most X programs.
>
> I haven't seen any font
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 10:19:09PM -, Paul Keenan wrote:
> I get the dim grey/green console effect (framebuffer
> console) and also some intermittent font corruption
> problems in most X programs.
I haven't seen any font corruption, only severe dimming.
>
> I'm using ThinkPad 600X which has
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 06:07:53PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 10:19:09PM -, Paul Keenan wrote:
> > I get the dim grey/green console effect (framebuffer
> > console) and also some intermittent font corruption
> > problems in most X programs.
>
> I haven't seen any fon
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 10:19:09PM -, Paul Keenan wrote:
> I get the dim grey/green console effect (framebuffer
> console) and also some intermittent font corruption
> problems in most X programs.
I haven't seen any font corruption, only severe dimming.
>
> I'm using ThinkPad 600X which has
I get the dim grey/green console effect (framebuffer
console) and also some intermittent font corruption
problems in most X programs.
I'm using ThinkPad 600X which has the NeoMagic
MagicMedia256ZX [nm2360 chip] using the 'neomagic'
driver.
Both problems went away when I changed the colour depth
f
I get the dim grey/green console effect (framebuffer
console) and also some intermittent font corruption
problems in most X programs.
I'm using ThinkPad 600X which has the NeoMagic
MagicMedia256ZX [nm2360 chip] using the 'neomagic'
driver.
Both problems went away when I changed the colour depth
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:03:52PM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:44:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 10:19:28PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >
> > > - When I switch to a virtual console, it is quite dim. This goes away
> > > if I suspend and
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:03:52PM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:44:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 10:19:28PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >
> > > - When I switch to a virtual console, it is quite dim. This goes away
> > > if I suspend an
4.0.1e (and 4.0.1-2 by Branden) does work on my IBM ThinkPad235
with C&T 6. Thanks!
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on "Thu, 09 Nov 2000 06:57:34 +0900",
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4.0.1e has some updates on C&T driver, it does not use cfb now but uses fb.
>
> But I'm not sure if
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:44:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 10:19:28PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> > - When I switch to a virtual console, it is quite dim. This goes away
> > if I suspend and resume my machine, but it didn't happen before.
> > Any idea wh
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 10:19:28PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> 4.0.1e, as packaged in 4.0.1-2, works for me! It's a good thing, as
> 48 hours without X was almost more than I could take. :-)
I'm very glad to hear this.
> One interesting thing is that it seems I really do have a C&T69000,
>
* Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001108 19:24]:
> - What's a good way to test the speed of the X server? This is just
> out of curiosity.
Benchmarks aren't much of an indication of speed, but if you want one,
you can see if x11perf does a good job. :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; S
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 4.0.1e has some updates on C&T driver, it does not use cfb now but uses fb.
>
> But I'm not sure if this new version can solve this problem, the change
> from 4.0.1d to 4.0.1e may be just irrelevant.
4.0.1e, as packaged in 4.0.1-2, works for me! It's
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 11:44:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 10:19:28PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> > - When I switch to a virtual console, it is quite dim. This goes away
> > if I suspend and resume my machine, but it didn't happen before.
> > Any idea w
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 10:19:28PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> 4.0.1e, as packaged in 4.0.1-2, works for me! It's a good thing, as
> 48 hours without X was almost more than I could take. :-)
I'm very glad to hear this.
> One interesting thing is that it seems I really do have a C&T69000,
>
* Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001108 19:24]:
> - What's a good way to test the speed of the X server? This is just
> out of curiosity.
Benchmarks aren't much of an indication of speed, but if you want one,
you can see if x11perf does a good job. :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big;
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 4.0.1e has some updates on C&T driver, it does not use cfb now but uses fb.
>
> But I'm not sure if this new version can solve this problem, the change
> from 4.0.1d to 4.0.1e may be just irrelevant.
4.0.1e, as packaged in 4.0.1-2, works for me! It'
Hi.
on "Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:57:40 -0500",
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 01:11:41PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > What is 4.0.1e? Does it have relevant fixes for C&T chips?
>
> A new beta version of XFree86 from upstream.
Thanks Branden for providin
Hi.
on "Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:57:40 -0500",
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 01:11:41PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > What is 4.0.1e? Does it have relevant fixes for C&T chips?
>
> A new beta version of XFree86 from upstream.
Thanks Branden for providi
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 01:11:41PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> What is 4.0.1e? Does it have relevant fixes for C&T chips?
A new beta version of XFree86 from upstream.
Debian packages based on this new beta version should be installed into
woody today.
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe another C&T driver problem. Trying 4.0.1e, or rebuild with DEBUG
> defined of chips_drv.o and libvgahw.a from the source would be recommended
> in order to track the cause of this problem.
What is 4.0.1e? Does it have relevant fixes for C&T chip
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 01:11:41PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> What is 4.0.1e? Does it have relevant fixes for C&T chips?
A new beta version of XFree86 from upstream.
Debian packages based on this new beta version should be installed into
woody today.
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe another C&T driver problem. Trying 4.0.1e, or rebuild with DEBUG
> defined of chips_drv.o and libvgahw.a from the source would be recommended
> in order to track the cause of this problem.
What is 4.0.1e? Does it have relevant fixes for C&T chi
Hi.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 02:23:29 -0800,
on Re: Problems with xfree86 4.0.1d - Compac Armada 1500c (CT69000+DSTN),
Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW -- your XFree86.0.log said your kernel was
> 2.2.something-presomething. Are you sure you
Hi.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on Wed, 8 Nov 2000 02:23:29 -0800,
on Re: Problems with xfree86 4.0.1d - Compac Armada 1500c (CT69000+DSTN),
Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW -- your XFree86.0.log said your kernel was
> 2.2.something-presomething. Are you su
* boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001108 02:08]:
> when i try to run the new (xf86 4.0.1d) Xserver on my nootbook
> compac armada 1500c (DSTN) - woody - 2.4.0-test10 ...
> the system lockup ...
>
> /var/log/XFree86.0.log :
[...]
> (==) CHIPS(0): Write-combining range (0x4000,0x20)
a)
* boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001108 02:08]:
> when i try to run the new (xf86 4.0.1d) Xserver on my nootbook
> compac armada 1500c (DSTN) - woody - 2.4.0-test10 ...
> the system lockup ...
>
> /var/log/XFree86.0.log :
[...]
> (==) CHIPS(0): Write-combining range (0x4000,0x20)
a)
27 matches
Mail list logo
