Hi.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:53:41 -0800,
on Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (bug) xserver-xfree86_4.0.1-5],
Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001119 05:00]:
> > Or you mean just the man page symlinking ? If so, excuse me for my
>
Hi.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:53:41 -0800,
on Re: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: (bug) xserver-xfree86_4.0.1-5],
Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001119 05:00]:
> > Or you mean just the man page symlinking ? If so, excuse me for my
* Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001119 05:00]:
> Or you mean just the man page symlinking ? If so, excuse me for my confusion.
Yes, man page symlinks. :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really
impressed down here, I can tell you.''
* Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001119 05:00]:
> Or you mean just the man page symlinking ? If so, excuse me for my confusion.
Yes, man page symlinks. :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really
impressed down here, I can tell you.''
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hi.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:03:29 -0800,
on Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (bug) xserver-xfree86_4.0.1-5],
Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
I don't
Hi.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:03:29 -0800,
on Re: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: (bug) xserver-xfree86_4.0.1-5],
Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
I don
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 02:14:04PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Hmm. No, there really isn't a good way of dealing with this.
I've made a debconf note that will attempt to club people over the head.
--
G. Branden Robinson | When I die I want to go peacefully in
Debian GNU/Linux
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001118 12:44]:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:03:29AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> > I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
>
> Can't do this because people can and may have, for
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:03:29AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
Can't do this because people can and may have, for instance, xserver-svga
and xserver-xfree86 installed simultaneous
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 02:14:04PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Hmm. No, there really isn't a good way of dealing with this.
I've made a debconf note that will attempt to club people over the head.
--
G. Branden Robinson | When I die I want to go peacefully in
Debian GNU/Linux
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001118 12:44]:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:03:29AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> > [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> > I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
>
> Can't do this because people can and may have, for
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:03:29AM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
> [Branden, could you make XF86Config-4 a symlink to XF86Config? That way,
> I can refer to XF86Config-4(5) directly. :]
Can't do this because people can and may have, for instance, xserver-svga
and xserver-xfree86 installed simultaneou
Yoriyosi,
Please do not email Branden directly. Email debian-user if you think the
problem is common, or debian-x if you think the problem is unique to the
Debian packaging of X. In this case, I believe it is unique to the
debian packaging of X, so debian-x would be the correct address to
email.
Yoriyosi,
Please do not email Branden directly. Email debian-user if you think the
problem is common, or debian-x if you think the problem is unique to the
Debian packaging of X. In this case, I believe it is unique to the
debian packaging of X, so debian-x would be the correct address to
email.
14 matches
Mail list logo
