tag 418889 pending
thanks
On Mon Jun 02 14:38, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I forgot to close this ITP bug in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau's changelog; so
> I have updated both packages. They are both at the same URL.
>
I have uploaded the packages. Next thing to do is install the packaging
in the XSF repo
Hi,
I am currently using Christopher Rogers (roaf) nouveau packages from his
Ubuntu PPA recompiled against sid.
I'm would definately like to see these in experimental - it would certainly
ween a large number of my friends from the non-free NVIDIA driver. More
importantly, I'm willing to help out
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 10:40,
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> FWIW, it would be useful for
> * Drivers like mach64 or xgi which haven't been merged into the
> kernel yet.
> * Testing TTM/DRI2 functionality with intel drive
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 21:42 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Pendant le temps de midi du mardi 13 mai 2008, vers 12:20, Michel
> Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> > I think it's fine for experimental, as long as the packager is aware
> >> > that it'll need quite some work to keep all
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du mardi 13 mai 2008, vers 12:20, Michel
Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> > I think it's fine for experimental, as long as the packager is aware
>> > that it'll need quite some work to keep all the bits together, not just
>> > the initial packaging.
>> > I don'
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 22:57 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers 17:29,
> Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > I think it's fine for experimental, as long as the packager is aware
> > that it'll need quite some work to keep a
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du lundi 12 mai 2008, vers 12:24, je
disais:
> On another topic, I am now able to compile mesa. That was not easy. ;-)
> So, I have a mesa-nouveau source package that builds the same binary
> packagesthan mesain unstable.I needtowo
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 mai
2008, vers 23:02, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> As I said in a previous message, libdrm changed ABI incompatibly between
> 2.3.0 and current master. That means you MUST NOT provide libdrm2.
I did not mess w
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du lundi 12 mai 2008, vers 01:51, Julien
Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> They did not assign a new library number yet. I won't take the risk to
>> try to guess if it will be libdrm3 or libdrm2.4. Moreover, nouveau/mesa
>> repository don't compile (it
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 23:42:23 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 mai
> 2008, vers 23:02, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > As I said in a previous message, libdrm changed ABI incompatibly between
> > 2.3.0 and curr
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 mai
2008, vers 23:02, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> As I said in a previous message, libdrm changed ABI incompatibly between
> 2.3.0 and current master. That means you MUST NOT provide libdrm2.
They did not assig
As I said in a previous message, libdrm changed ABI incompatibly between
2.3.0 and current master. That means you MUST NOT provide libdrm2.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers 17:29,
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> I think it's fine for experimental, as long as the packager is aware
> that it'll need quite some work to keep all the bits together, not just
> the initial packaging.
> I don't ex
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 17:20:56 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> To summarize, to push xserver-xorg-video-nouveau into experimental, we
> need:
> - libdrm git snapshot
drm. not just libdrm.
> - mesa git snapshot
>
> Moreover, libdrm git snapshot will generate a module source package that
> w
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers 16:42, je
disais:
>>> nouveau needs an up-to-date mesa (7.3.0) that we already have in
>>> Debian. It also needs an up-to-date libdrm (current git, 2.3.0 is not
>>> ok) that we don't have in Debian. Moreover, from libdrm, we
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers
15:55, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> nouveau needs an up-to-date mesa (7.3.0) that we already have in
>> Debian. It also needs an up-to-date libdrm (current git, 2.3.0 is not
>> ok) that we don't ha
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 15:44:08 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> nouveau needs an up-to-date mesa (7.3.0) that we already have in
> Debian. It also needs an up-to-date libdrm (current git, 2.3.0 is not
> ok) that we don't have in Debian. Moreover, from libdrm, we should build
> "nouveau-
Hi!
There is currently an ITP to package nouveau:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418889
However, Matthew seems to not have time yet to package nouveau. I would
like to help a bit.
nouveau needs an up-to-date mesa (7.3.0) that we already have in
Debian. It also needs
18 matches
Mail list logo
