OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 mai 2008, vers 23:02, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> As I said in a previous message, libdrm changed ABI incompatibly between
> 2.3.0 and current master. That means you MUST NOT provide libdrm2.
I did not mess with library soname, instead I just make a package
libdrm2n instead and I have modified shlibs to reflect the change. This
means that I still ship libdrm.2.3.0 (I replace and conflict) but
packages that build using this libdrm will depends on libdrm2n (>>
2.3.0). Is it ok?
On another topic, I am now able to compile mesa. That was not easy. ;-)
So, I have a mesa-nouveau source package that builds the same binary
packages than mesa in unstable. I need to work on
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau now. And test the whole thing.
I discovered that xserver-xorg-core is a reverse depends of libdrm2 and
therefore, I need to recompile it. I suppose that (if the packages hit
experimental one day) I will need to upload a binary only package.
--
# Okay, what on Earth is this one supposed to be used for?
2.4.0 linux/drivers/char/cp437.uni
pgp0FmuaYAJqE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
