Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is there common code inside sis_dri.so?
Yes, the common code is part of all the code. :)
OK. (I don't consider my question that stupid :) as common code could
reside in other - common - modules as well)
I assume as regards 4.3, you mean the inclusion of Mesa4, right? W
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is there common code inside sis_dri.so?
Yes, the common code is part of all the code. :)
OK. (I don't consider my question that stupid :) as common code could
reside in other - common - modules as well)
I assume as regards 4.3, you mean the inclusion of Mesa4, right? Wel
On Don, 2003-01-02 at 01:54, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> >>There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my
> >>comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.)
> >
> > I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client
> > side
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
while.
It is, I assume.
Assumptions tend to be flawed. :
On Don, 2003-01-02 at 01:54, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> >>There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my
> >>comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.)
> >
> > I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client
> > side
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
while.
It is, I assume.
Assumptions tend to be flawed. :)
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
> > definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
> > while.
>
> It is, I assume.
Assumptions tend to be flawed. :) Have there
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
> > definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
> > while.
>
> It is, I assume.
Assumptions tend to be flawed. :) Have there
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
while.
It is, I assume. Otherwise how should one explain why just exchanging
sis_dri.so makes it work? The logical consequence can only be t
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
while.
It is, I assume. Otherwise how should one explain why just exchanging
sis_dri.so makes it work? The logical consequence can only be th
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 16:13, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> I finally updated to 4.2.1 (-4) from 4.1.0.1 and found that DRI on the
> SiS chipsets does not work anymore.
>
> My box is running kernel 2.4.19 (with xfs patch, otherwise vanilla) and
> the latest XFree 4.2.1-4 packages from unstable.
>
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 16:13, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> I finally updated to 4.2.1 (-4) from 4.1.0.1 and found that DRI on the
> SiS chipsets does not work anymore.
>
> My box is running kernel 2.4.19 (with xfs patch, otherwise vanilla) and
> the latest XFree 4.2.1-4 packages from unstable.
>
I finally updated to 4.2.1 (-4) from 4.1.0.1 and found that DRI on the
SiS chipsets does not work anymore.
My box is running kernel 2.4.19 (with xfs patch, otherwise vanilla) and
the latest XFree 4.2.1-4 packages from unstable.
The (XFree) SiS driver enables DRI correctly, but glxgears says
I finally updated to 4.2.1 (-4) from 4.1.0.1 and found that DRI on the
SiS chipsets does not work anymore.
My box is running kernel 2.4.19 (with xfs patch, otherwise vanilla) and
the latest XFree 4.2.1-4 packages from unstable.
The (XFree) SiS driver enables DRI correctly, but glxgears says "D
14 matches
Mail list logo
