On Don, 2003-01-02 at 01:54, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > >>There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my > >>comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.) > > > > I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client > > side DRI code and the drivers was changed in a way that renders the SiS > > driver non-working. > > Is there common code inside sis_dri.so?
Yes, the common code is part of all the code. :) > >>I assume as regards 4.3, you mean the inclusion of Mesa4, right? Well, > >>no one of the DRI folks seems to care about the SiS driver, so this is > >>hopeless anyway. > > > > > > It's not the job of the DRI folks to maintain a driver for hardware they > > don't have. > > That's exactly what I have been doing for a year now. Implementing > support for hardware I don't have.... (SiS 315, 550, 650, 740, etc) I don't know of any DRI developers having any SiS hardware, and I think this is even harder to do for 3D than it is for 2D. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
