Your message dated Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:04:46 +0800
with message-id <87zlcdvc0h@jidanni.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#526169: even xdm login screen becomes unreadable
rectangular chunks
has caused the Debian Bug report #526169,
regarding can't even read the login screen
to be mar
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> OK, I see you have a new version. Well, before doing
> # dpkg -i xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3a2.6.1-1_i386.deb
> dpkg: warning: downgrading xserver-xorg-video-intel from 2:2.7.99.901-1 to
> 2:2.6.1-1.
> # aptitude hold xserver-xorg-video-intel
> here on
> # una
>Ho ho ho, still a disaster, and even in experimental, there is no such a
>high numbered kernel yet. Alas, must do
># dpkg -i xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3a2.6.1-1_i386.deb
># aptitude forbid-version xserver-xorg-video-intel
Can you please tell me where could I find
xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3a2.6
Well, they never did put it into their Packages file, though it is on
disk.
This tells me I will be stepping into deeper water than my education
level is appropriate for. I might even end up locking myself out of my
system.
P.S.,
W: GPG error: http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net sid Release: Th
OK, I managed to put
deb http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel sid main
in sources.list, and even though I see the "30" stuff in
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/
however only the "29" stuff is yet in
/var/lib/apt/lists/kernel-archive.buildserv
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
>> Does this still happen with intel 2.7.99.1-2 and kernel 2.6.30-rc8 or so?
>>
> Ho ho ho, still a disaster, and even in experimental, there is no such a
> high numbered kernel yet.
What about 2.6.30-rc7 if rc8 isn't available on
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.n
> Does this still happen with intel 2.7.99.1-2 and kernel 2.6.30-rc8 or so?
Ho ho ho, still a disaster, and even in experimental, there is no such a
high numbered kernel yet. Alas, must do
# dpkg -i xserver-xorg-video-intel_2%3a2.6.1-1_i386.deb
# aptitude forbid-version xserver-xorg-video-intel
Used
$ apt-cache policy $@
linux-image-2.6.29-2-686:
Installed: 2.6.29-5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Does this still happen with intel 2.7.99.1-2 and kernel 2.6.30-rc8 or so?
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I installed a kernel with the patch referred to in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526169#41 and the tiling
persists. However I managed to solve the problem by setting the Tiling
option to false as mentioned in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21246#c10
Currently my
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.7.99.1-1
Severity: normal
On my Lenovo T61 notebook I have black screen after run new intel video
driver, sometimes with pieces of cursor at various place of screen.
There are error messages in log, probably appeared after VT swith try
(without visi
This is a horrible bug that I see on my 855GM (Thinkpad X40), forcing
me to use 2.6.26 instead.
It might be a good idea for the kernel team to see this because they
might be able to cherry pick the patch?
--
Regards,
Sheridan Hutchinson
sheri...@shezza.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
This is not a bug in xorg intel driver itself but in kernel KMS code.
See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21246 for more details and
link to linux git comming with patch.
Installing 2.6.30-rc4 fix this issue.
Maybe this bug(s) should be reassigned to debian linux kernel package? Patc
I'm experiencing the same behavior with version 2:2.7.0-1, but X is only
broken with kernel 2.6.29-1-686. I get a correct display with kernel
2.6.26-2-686.
I attach X logs for both kernels.
Xorg.2.6.26.bz2
Description: Binary data
Xorg.2.6.29.bz2
Description: Binary data
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:52:53 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> We need your full X log, as usual... Make sure you're using 2.6.29 or
> even 2.6.30-rc since recent intel drivers like recent kernels (2.7.99.1
> enforces UXA which requires GEM anyway).
>
UXA has supposedly been fixed to work without
Brice Goglin writes:
> We need your full X log, as usual... Make sure you're using 2.6.29
Roger. Here you go my man. .old is the unhappy new run.
Don't worry about 'dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so failed'. I
purged that package momentarily but it didn't make any difference.
Xorg.0.log.bz2
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> found 526169 2:2.7.99.1-1
> severity 526169 grave
> retitle 526169 can't even read the login screen
> thanks
> 2:2.7.99.1-1 is a little better. At least the Debian logo is readable
> on the xdm login screen, but still not any other words.
>
We need your full X log,
found 526169 2:2.7.99.1-1
severity 526169 grave
retitle 526169 can't even read the login screen
thanks
2:2.7.99.1-1 is a little better. At least the Debian logo is readable
on the xdm login screen, but still not any other words.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
18 matches
Mail list logo
