Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-06-21 Thread Stewart Stremler
begin quoting Brice Goglin as of Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 08:09:47PM +0200: > Hi Stewart, > > Did you have a chance to try upgrading you system to Debian Etch with > its 2.6.18 kernel? Did it help getting Xorg to work on your ATI board? Sorry, I recently lost access to that machine. I will not be re

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-06-21 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi Stewart, Did you have a chance to try upgrading you system to Debian Etch with its 2.6.18 kernel? Did it help getting Xorg to work on your ATI board? Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#367947: [Fwd: Re: Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade]

2007-03-06 Thread Brice Goglin
(Forwarding a followup from Stewart, after fixing a typo in the URL) FYI, I ran across: http://www-gatago.com/linux/debian/ports/sparc/33510445.html ...and from my machine... Running "lspci". Script started on Mon Mar 5 18:28:36 2007 u10> lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Comp

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-02-19 Thread Stewart Stremler
begin quoting Brice Goglin as of Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:07:26AM +0100: > Brice Goglin wrote: > >>> Let's see what you get with the ATI driver, the other warnings might be > >>> related to the VGA driver. Try without DRI first. > >>> > >>> > >> Okay. I now get a new and different behav

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-02-19 Thread Brice Goglin
Brice Goglin wrote: >>> Let's see what you get with the ATI driver, the other warnings might be >>> related to the VGA driver. Try without DRI first. >>> >>> >> Okay. I now get a new and different behavior: an all black screen. I >> commented out the 1600x1280 resolutions ('cuz it's an

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-01-26 Thread Brice Goglin
Stewart Stremler wrote: >>> It changes, in that it but it's not better. It complains about the >>> DRI module not being loaded instead of complaining about screen 0 >>> not being DRI capable. >>> >> Right, AIGLX won't be enabled, but it is not important. >> The possibly bad warnings that rem

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-01-25 Thread Stewart Stremler
begin quoting Brice Goglin as of Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 02:12:07AM +0100: > Stewart Stremler wrote: > > Not that I am aware of. (Then again, it's been quite some time since > > I last fought with this machine.) There's an xserver-xorg-video-ati > > package > > installed. > > Since you have an ATI b

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-01-24 Thread Brice Goglin
Stewart Stremler wrote: > Not that I am aware of. (Then again, it's been quite some time since > I last fought with this machine.) There's an xserver-xorg-video-ati > package > installed. Since you have an ATI board and this ATI driver package, why do you use the VGA driver? :) Section "Device"

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-01-24 Thread Stewart Stremler
begin quoting Brice Goglin as of Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:17:00PM +0100: > Stewart Stremler wrote: > > Still, no joy, although now it seems to be complaining about libGLcore, > > > > glcore should not be loaded explicitly nowadays. You should remove "load > glcore" from xorg.conf. The server wi

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-01-24 Thread Brice Goglin
Stewart Stremler wrote: > Still, no joy, although now it seems to be complaining about libGLcore, > glcore should not be loaded explicitly nowadays. You should remove "load glcore" from xorg.conf. The server will load it when it needs it. The _gl_dispatch error looks strange to me. It looks li

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-01-18 Thread Brice Goglin
Stewart Stremler wrote: > begin quoting Brice Goglin as of Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:34:09AM +0100: > >> Hi, >> >> Last year, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding X not working >> anymore on a Ultra 10 machine after dist-upgrade to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1. >> Did you reproduce this proble

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-01-17 Thread Stewart Stremler
begin quoting Brice Goglin as of Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:34:09AM +0100: > Hi, > > Last year, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding X not working > anymore on a Ultra 10 machine after dist-upgrade to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1. > Did you reproduce this problem recently? If not, I will close th

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2007-01-17 Thread Brice Goglin
Hi, Last year, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding X not working anymore on a Ultra 10 machine after dist-upgrade to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1. Did you reproduce this problem recently? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Thanks, Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2006-05-18 Thread Stremler
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 I recently did an apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade, and when all was said and done, X no longer worked. I still get the speckled screen and the X pointer for just a second, and then it quits with a signal 11. The startx output, config