Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 332548 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.5.7.3-3
Bug#332548: xserver-xorg: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1 breaks radeon dual-head
Bug#345509: xserver-xorg: 2nd monitor in xinerama setup gets no signal
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `xserver-xo
reassign 332548 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.5.7.3-3
forwarded 332548 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5447
stop
On 13.04.06 15:40:37, Stian Jordet wrote:
> tor, 13,.04.2006 kl. 02.40 +0200, skrev Andreas Pakulat:
> > On 21.03.06 17:40:51, Stian Jordet wrote:
> > > Just to inform everyon
tor, 13,.04.2006 kl. 02.40 +0200, skrev Andreas Pakulat:
> On 21.03.06 17:40:51, Stian Jordet wrote:
> > Just to inform everyone; by using latest ati-driver from cvs it works
> > perfect again ;)
>
> Hi Stian,
>
> I just fetched cvs head of driver/xf86-video-ati and used the debian
> diff.gz to b
On 21.03.06 17:40:51, Stian Jordet wrote:
> Just to inform everyone; by using latest ati-driver from cvs it works
> perfect again ;)
Hi Stian,
I just fetched cvs head of driver/xf86-video-ati and used the debian
diff.gz to build a debian package out of it. However I had no luck, the
problem still
On 21.03.06 17:40:51, Stian Jordet wrote:
> Just to inform everyone; by using latest ati-driver from cvs it works
> perfect again ;)
So if I use Xorg 7.0 from experimental and build the ati-driver from cvs
I should be fine again?
Maybe I'll try that next weekend and report here.
Andreas
--
Is
søn, 26,.02.2006 kl. 13.29 +0100, skrev Michel Dänzer:
> On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 23:25 +0100, Stian Jordet wrote:
> >
> > I don't have Debian on this computer, but I'd like to note that on
> > Ubuntu, I only need to downgrade xserver-xorg-core
>
> To what version?
I downgrade from 1:1.0.1-0ubuntu
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 23:25 +0100, Stian Jordet wrote:
>
> I don't have Debian on this computer, but I'd like to note that on
> Ubuntu, I only need to downgrade xserver-xorg-core
To what version?
> to get my dual-head/xinerama working again. It's _not_ the radeon driver
> that's the problem.
Hi,
I don't have Debian on this computer, but I'd like to note that on
Ubuntu, I only need to downgrade xserver-xorg-core to get my
dual-head/xinerama working again. It's _not_ the radeon driver that's
the problem.
Of course, the Debian bug might be a totally different problem, but I
doubt it.
h
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:56 -0500, Jim Paris wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:00 -0500, Paul Donohue wrote:
>
> > I suspect some of the problems are due to the autoconfage only having
> > been added relatively recently; it might be better to contain cvs -D to
> > the src
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:00 -0500, Paul Donohue wrote:
> > I grabbed the 12/20/05 version of the driver from cvs (I think this should
> > correspond to 6.9.0):
> > 'cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg co -D "2005-12-20"
> > driver/xf86-video-ati'
The buggy change
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:00 -0500, Paul Donohue wrote:
>
> I grabbed the 12/20/05 version of the driver from cvs (I think this should
> correspond to 6.9.0):
> 'cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/xorg co -D "2005-12-20"
> driver/xf86-video-ati'
> I installed the autoconf2.13 and libtool pa
> Older driver code should still work with the current server code.
> http://cvs.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/
> Note that in order to build this, you'll need xserver-xorg-dev from
> experimental or Ubuntu dapper, or to build xserver CVS yourself.
I've been having a horrible time try
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 10:18 -0500, Paul Donohue wrote:
> > > It sounds like switching to MergedFB mode or the fglrx drivers fixes
> > > the problem for everyone -
> > BTW, dual head is known not to work correctly with fglrx when direct
> > rendering is not enabled. That's not related to this bug.
> > It sounds like switching to MergedFB mode or the fglrx drivers fixes
> > the problem for everyone -
> BTW, dual head is known not to work correctly with fglrx when direct
> rendering is not enabled. That's not related to this bug.
When direct rendering is not enabled? Hmmm... I was under th
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 12:22 -0500, Paul Donohue wrote:
> There seem to be two separate (but possibly related) problems occuring with
> the radeon driver:
> For some people, upgrading from xorg 6.8.2 to xorg 6.8.99 or 6.9.0 causes the
> second display to go blank.
> For other people, the same upgr
Oops... Forgot the attachments...
Section "Files"
#FontPath "unix/:7100"# local font server
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled"
>It sounds like switching to MergedFB mode or the fglrx drivers fixes the
>problem for everyone - the bug only surfaces when trying to use the two card
>outputs independently (for example, by configuring two Device sections for the
>two outputs of the card, then using Xinerama). Unfortunately,
Hi,
I have noted that X believes that the second monitor is alive; the
desktop is sized as if both monitors were working. I can move the mouse
cursor to the secondary monitor (blinking "No signal") and I can also
move windows to the secondary monitor. It's tricky to move them back
into view, thoug
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 20:31 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >>
> >> MergedFB false doesn't send signal to secondary, [...]
> >
> > I think that's expected, as MergedFB unifies all
> > s
#332548, #345509, and #345839 should probably merged.
Since I don't pretend to understand anything about X servers I hesitate
to do it myself though ;)
Oh, me too BTW... but as so many people before have sent in their
logs and confs I guess mine wont make any difference.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichte
Hallo Holger,
El dom, 08-01-2006 a las 14:57 +0100, Holger Pieta escribió:
> got the same problem (second screen a clone of the first screen),
> tinkered a bit, found the following solution.
> remarks: previously used the "Screen 1 RightOf Screen 0" setup
> now using the "Merg
Hi
I have currently the same issue using the radeon 7000.
It was working fine on Xorg 6.8.2 and now on 6.9.0 I get a black
screen on my 2nd monitor..
do you have a work around?
Thanks
Emmanuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>
>> MergedFB false doesn't send signal to secondary, [...]
>
> I think that's expected, as MergedFB unifies all
> single-device-multiple-outputs configurations including clone mode.
So we m
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:49 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I really don't think it is done on purpose: Why bother going
>> through all the mode validation on the secondary, and _SELECT_ a
>> mode(line) from the secondary if it i
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:58:36PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I read this too fast: What you report is exactly what this bug
>> report is about: 6.9.0-1 with MergedFB false doesn't send signal to
>> secondary, [...]
> I think that
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:49 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> I really don't think it is done on purpose: Why bother going through
> all the mode validation on the secondary, and _SELECT_ a mode(line)
> from the secondary if it is to turn off output to it? Look at the
> logs. The driver thinks
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 21:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> I read this too fast: What you report is exactly what this bug report
> is about: 6.9.0-1 with MergedFB false doesn't send signal to
> secondary, [...]
I think that's expected, as MergedFB unifies all
single-device-multiple-outputs
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:48:49PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:27:36PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
>> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Section "Device"
>>> Identifier "ATI Radeon 9200 SE Primary"
>>> Driver "ati"
>>>
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:27:36PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Section "Device"
>> Identifier "ATI Radeon 9200 SE Primary"
>> Driver "ati"
>> BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
>> #Option "CloneMode" "128
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "ATI Radeon 9200 SE Primary"
> Driver "ati"
> BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
> # Option "CloneMode" "1280x1024"
> # Option "CloneDisplay" "0"
> Screen
Hi,
El jue, 05-01-2006 a las 18:02 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane escribió:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1
> Followup-For: Bug #332548
>
> I tried using
>Option "IgnoreEDID" "true"
> doesn't help. I also tried putting
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
I have struck the exact same problem. Starting X.org 6.9.0 from unstable
with the good old dual-head setup that has worked since xfree86 4.3
(slightly modified on x.org transition) brings me a dual-head sized
desktop, but a black s
Option "IgnoreEDID" "true" doesn't seem to change anything. The monitor
still powers down. Just to clarify, X is operating in dual head mode,
since I can move the mouse off my laptop screen onto the dead one...it's
just that the external monitor is not powered on.
Attached is the diff (-u) and the
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 23:54 +1300, donn morrison wrote:
>
> Attached is a diff of my Xorg logs between the working and non-working
> versions.
Thanks (in the future, please use diff -u )
for better readability). The only thing that jumps out at me is that
only the new version complains about the
Michel,
Yes, the monitor supports it.
Here is the scenario:
It works fine under 6.8.2 (from Debian unstable). Upon upgrading to
6.8.99.900 (experimental) the configuration is broken. NB: No
configuration files are changed, therefore running "apt-get install
xserver-xorg/experimental" breaks my s
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 11:02 +1300, donn morrison wrote:
> Not specifying sync ranges in the monitor sections doesn't appear to
> help. The monitor displays a "no signal" message, not an "out of range"
> message. Anyway, here are the xorg.conf and Xorg log for the test
> without sync ranges for 6.8.
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:57 +1300, donn morrison wrote:
>
> An additional comment: From the log the external CRT appears to be
> detected, however, once X is started in dual-head mode the monitor
> reports no signal.
Try not specifying sync ranges in the monitor sections, they seem to
cause the
Note that my graphics adaptor is actually a Mobility 9000, not a 9200 as
I had originally stated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, reportbug attached the wrong Xorg log (I was testing on
display :1). Here is the correct log.
An additional comment: From the log the external CRT appears to be
detected, however, once X is started in dual-head mode the monitor
reports no signal.
_XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to o
39 matches
Mail list logo
