Re: Bug#329035: marked as done (MANIFESTs are missing r300_dri.so)

2005-09-19 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le lundi 19 septembre 2005 à 13:33 -0400, Michel Dänzer a écrit : > On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 09:47 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > I would like to have DRI enabled, > > You'll need xserver-xorg from experimental and the DRM from DRI CVS or > possibly a 2.6.14-rc(-git or -mm?) kernel. Ah ok, I thou

Re: Bug#329035: marked as done (MANIFESTs are missing r300_dri.so)

2005-09-19 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 09:47 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 02:18, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > > r300_dri.so is missing from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri, because it's not > > > in the MANIFEST.i386. > > > > No, it's because the r300 driver doesn't get built yet in t

Re: Bug#329035: marked as done (MANIFESTs are missing r300_dri.so)

2005-09-19 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 09:47, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > You can get it in sid, in the libgl1-mesa-dri package. > > Oh, cool ! Can someone tell me how to to use it ? Here is what I have in > my logs: > > (==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xc000,0x800) > (WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering

Re: Bug#329035: marked as done (MANIFESTs are missing r300_dri.so)

2005-09-19 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 02:18, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > r300_dri.so is missing from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri, because it's not > > in the MANIFEST.i386. > > No, it's because the r300 driver doesn't get built yet in the X.Org tree > due to its experimental nature. > > > This is the o

Bug#329035: marked as done (MANIFESTs are missing r300_dri.so)

2005-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:11:29 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329035: MANIFESTs are missing r300_dri.so has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it