Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:11:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329035: MANIFESTs are missing r300_dri.so
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 23:52:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 16:52:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailfarm.berkeley.edu (calmail-fe2.berkeley.edu) [128.32.61.106]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EH8xA-0005gT-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:52:12 -0700
Received: from [169.229.99.128] (account [EMAIL PROTECTED] HELO
localhost.localdomain)
by calmail-fe2.berkeley.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.6)
with ESMTP-TLS id 141144483; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:51:38 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D814243729; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MANIFESTs are missing r300_dri.so
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:02:31 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xorg-x11
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
r300_dri.so is missing from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri, because it's not
in the MANIFEST.i386.
This is the only file I waited a long time for experimental for :(
Thanks
Josh
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329035-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 00:11:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 17:11:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from darkcity.gna.ch [195.226.6.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EH9GI-0008Ry-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:11:58 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1AB133CE4;
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 02:11:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket)
id client-XXxxKQqy; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 02:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix, from userid 65534)
id 81D8F133CE3; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 02:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost
(CPE001124084852-CM014500006147.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [65.48.154.37])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F57133CB6;
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 02:11:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from daenzer by localhost with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EH9Fq-0006nQ-Do; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:11:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Bug#329035: MANIFESTs are missing r300_dri.so
From: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Organization: Debian
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:11:29 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gna.ch
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 21:02 -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Package: xorg-x11
> Severity: normal
> Tags: experimental
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> r300_dri.so is missing from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri, because it's not
> in the MANIFEST.i386.
No, it's because the r300 driver doesn't get built yet in the X.Org tree
due to its experimental nature.
> This is the only file I waited a long time for experimental for :(
You can get it in sid, in the libgl1-mesa-dri package.
Closing this (non-)bug.
--=20
Earthling Michel D=C3=A4nzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI develop=
er
Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=3Ddaenzer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
