Bug#271542: xlibs: Can't get Meta and Alt to work correctly

2004-10-15 Thread Denis Barbier
Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 02:28:17PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 10:35:08AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > I should have mentioned that there is a 3rd way, which is to add an > > option to disable fake keys. [...] > I say: Go for it. Once this i

Bug#271542: xlibs: Can't get Meta and Alt to work correctly

2004-10-12 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 02:28:17PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 10:35:08AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > [...] > > The problem is that changes were made upstream in xlibs to improve support > > for multiple layouts. Some applications are confused and fail to handle > > the

Bug#271542: xlibs: Can't get Meta and Alt to work correctly

2004-09-19 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 10:35:08AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: [...] > The problem is that changes were made upstream in xlibs to improve support > for multiple layouts. Some applications are confused and fail to handle > the current keymaps. > So there are 2 solutions: > a. Fix xlibs. > b. Fi

Bug#271542: xlibs: Can't get Meta and Alt to work correctly

2004-09-19 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: [...] > When starting up X, the following behaviour happens: > > - Emacs does not recognise Meta as Meta, but recognises Alt as Meta, >which it shouldn't. Note that if I remember well, Emacs >automatically treats Alt as M

Bug#271542: xlibs: Can't get Meta and Alt to work correctly

2004-09-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Package: xlibs Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 Severity: normal In continuation of my message in bug 256706. As it has been declared fixed, but I still suffer keyboard problems, I suppose my problem is _not_ the one of this bug. Behaviour has changed since -6, but is still not correct. I have a Microsoft