On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 02:05:23AM -0800, Ron wrote:
> I'm not sure how the C++ ABI change affects xlibmesa (though it may of
> course affect X in other ways) because I can link to it just fine
> tonight building everything else with g++3.2 -- but unless mesa is
> going to get put back together thi
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:48:12AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:16:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:06:38AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > > PS: What does the 3
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 02:05:23AM -0800, Ron wrote:
> I'm not sure how the C++ ABI change affects xlibmesa (though it may of
> course affect X in other ways) because I can link to it just fine
> tonight building everything else with g++3.2 -- but unless mesa is
> going to get put back together thi
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:48:12AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:16:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:06:38AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > > PS: What does the 3
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:16:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:06:38AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
> >
> > It's the soname; the major ver
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:06:38AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
>
> It's the soname; the major version of the number after .so. It's been
> bumped to 4 in 4.3.
And to 5 in 5.0.
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> I like that, may I suggest splitting out the DRI modules into something
> like xlibmesa3-dri-modules while we're at it? Or does mesag3 support GLX
> indirect rendering as well, and DRI is the whole point of xlibmesa3-gl?
As far as I
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:14:45PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Mit, 2003-01-08 at 22:06, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
> >
> > It's the soname; the major version of the numb
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
It's the soname; the major version of the number after .so. It's been
bumped to 4 in 4.3.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trin
On Mit, 2003-01-08 at 22:06, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
>
> It's the soname; the major version of the number after .so. It's been
> bumped to 4 in 4.3.
That's 1 for libGL.so.1.2, do
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:16:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:06:38AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
> >
> > It's the soname; the major ver
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> I like that, may I suggest splitting out the DRI modules into something
> like xlibmesa3-dri-modules while we're at it? Or does mesag3 support GLX
> indirect rendering as well, and DRI is the whole point of xlibmesa3-gl?
As far as I
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:06:38AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
>
> It's the soname; the major version of the number after .so. It's been
> bumped to 4 in 4.3.
And to 5 in 5.0.
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:14:45PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Mit, 2003-01-08 at 22:06, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > > PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
> >
> > It's the soname; the major version of the numb
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
It's the soname; the major version of the number after .so. It's been
bumped to 4 in 4.3.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trin
On Mit, 2003-01-08 at 22:06, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:20:16PM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> > PS: What does the 3 in xlibmesa3 stand for anyway?
>
> It's the soname; the major version of the number after .so. It's been
> bumped to 4 in 4.3.
That's 1 for libGL.so.1.2, do
On Mit, 2003-01-08 at 09:12, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I will have:
>
> xlibmesa3-gl Conflicts libgl1
> Provides libgl1
> Replaces xlibmesa3
> xlibmesa3-gl-dev Conflicts mesa-common-dev, libgl-dev
> Provides libgl-dev
>
On Mit, 2003-01-08 at 09:12, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I will have:
>
> xlibmesa3-gl Conflicts libgl1
> Provides libgl1
> Replaces xlibmesa3
> xlibmesa3-gl-dev Conflicts mesa-common-dev, libgl-dev
> Provides libgl-dev
>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:12:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 12:24:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Who split the mesa package without telling me? Has the ABI changed?
>
> (Thanks a lot for the answers, debian-x. :-P )
:(
> I will have:
>
> xlibmesa3-gl
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:12:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 12:24:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Who split the mesa package without telling me? Has the ABI changed?
>
> (Thanks a lot for the answers, debian-x. :-P )
:(
> I will have:
>
> xlibmesa3-gl
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 12:24:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Who split the mesa package without telling me? Has the ABI changed?
(Thanks a lot for the answers, debian-x. :-P )
Answer: Marcelo Magallon.
> > It also needs to conflict with mesa-common-dev (else it fails to install
> > when
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 12:24:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Who split the mesa package without telling me? Has the ABI changed?
(Thanks a lot for the answers, debian-x. :-P )
Answer: Marcelo Magallon.
> > It also needs to conflict with mesa-common-dev (else it fails to install
> > when
[This message also going to the debian-x mailing list.]
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 12:43:16AM -0800, Ron wrote:
> Recent changes to the mesa package aren't reflected in xlibmesa yet.
That's correct. XFree86 keeps its own copy of Mesa and resyncs with
Mesa upstream on its own schedule.
> Packages w
[This message also going to the debian-x mailing list.]
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 12:43:16AM -0800, Ron wrote:
> Recent changes to the mesa package aren't reflected in xlibmesa yet.
That's correct. XFree86 keeps its own copy of Mesa and resyncs with
Mesa upstream on its own schedule.
> Packages w
Package: xlibmesa-dev
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: important
Howdy,
Recent changes to the mesa package aren't reflected in xlibmesa yet.
Packages which used to build-dep on libgl-dev may now need to also add
libglu-dev. xlibmesa should provide this now too (or it will probably
get passed over as a
Package: xlibmesa-dev
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: important
Howdy,
Recent changes to the mesa package aren't reflected in xlibmesa yet.
Packages which used to build-dep on libgl-dev may now need to also add
libglu-dev. xlibmesa should provide this now too (or it will probably
get passed over as a
26 matches
Mail list logo
