On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:12:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 12:24:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Who split the mesa package without telling me? Has the ABI changed? > > (Thanks a lot for the answers, debian-x. :-P )
:( > I will have: > > xlibmesa3-gl Conflicts libgl1 > Provides libgl1 > Replaces xlibmesa3 > xlibmesa3-gl-dev Conflicts mesa-common-dev, libgl-dev > Provides libgl-dev > Replaces xlibmesa-dev > xlibmesa3-glu Conflicts libglu1 > Provides libglu1 > Replaces xlibmesa3 > xlibmesa3-glu-dev Conflicts libglu-dev > Provides libglu-dev > Replaces xlibmesa-dev > > Comments? I'm not sure how the C++ ABI change affects xlibmesa (though it may of course affect X in other ways) because I can link to it just fine tonight building everything else with g++3.2 -- but unless mesa is going to get put back together this seems the only sane option now. You cut it even finer than Ryan for saving me an instant rebuild, but in light of the above I've added libglu-dev to the build deps on the wx2.4 packages I'll be uploading in a couple of hours. I forced past the dep to build here with xlibmesa for i386, but I have no idea what the preferred libgl provider for other arches is. I presume for now the buildd's will fall back to mesa unless someone can and wants to kludge them to let xlibmesa-dev also satisfy: libgl-dev, libglu-dev. Thanks for the forward notice in any case Branden. Ron
