On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:56:09AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a
> > very rude thing to do to our users.
>
> ?? I did never read your messages as hostile. Yuo have been e
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:56:09AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a
> > very rude thing to do to our users.
>
> ?? I did never read your messages as hostile. Yuo have been e
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:56:09AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> >
> > I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a
> > very rude thing to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a
> very rude thing to do to our users.
?? I did never read
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:56:09AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> >
> > I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a
> > very rude thing to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a
> very rude thing to do to our users.
?? I did never read
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility
> > with upstream XFree86.
>
> Of course this is a very very good argument perfectly understandable.
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status.
> [...]
> > At this point in time I would suggest to proceed
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility
> > with upstream XFree86.
>
> Of course this is a very very good argument perfectly understandable.
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status.
> [...]
> > At this point in time I would suggest to proceed
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status.
[...]
> At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with inclusion and be
> ready to merge with 4.3.0, test and send upstream. More than rejecting the
>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status.
[...]
> At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with inclusion and be
> ready to merge with 4.3.0, test and send upstream. More than rejecting the
>
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > PS I was not able to search too much on INRIA and on the university of
> > Paris (as suggested) for the simple reason that 99% of the pages I found
> > are in french.
>
> Eh?
>
> Typing ``X11R6 IPv6 INRIA'' in Google gives the following English pa
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > PS I was not able to search too much on INRIA and on the university of
> > Paris (as suggested) for the simple reason that 99% of the pages I found
> > are in french.
>
> Eh?
>
> Typing ``X11R6 IPv6 INRIA'' in Google gives the following English pa
> PS I was not able to search too much on INRIA and on the university of
> Paris (as suggested) for the simple reason that 99% of the pages I found
> are in french.
Eh?
Typing ``X11R6 IPv6 INRIA'' in Google gives the following English page
as the third hit:
http://www.ipv6.org/impl/inria.html
> PS I was not able to search too much on INRIA and on the university of
> Paris (as suggested) for the simple reason that 99% of the pages I found
> are in french.
Eh?
Typing ``X11R6 IPv6 INRIA'' in Google gives the following English page
as the third hit:
http://www.ipv6.org/impl/inria.html
I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status.
x.org just claims that R6.7 will support it. I wasn't able to access their
cvs, possibly my fault) so im do not know their real status.
xfree86.org placed 4.3.0 in features freeze the 30th of Novemeber so
basically it means that
I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status.
x.org just claims that R6.7 will support it. I wasn't able to access their
cvs, possibly my fault) so im do not know their real status.
xfree86.org placed 4.3.0 in features freeze the 30th of Novemeber so
basically it means that
18 matches
Mail list logo
